06.07.2013 Views

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mechanisms and Inheritance of Resistance to Insect Pests 127<br />

Number of eggs laid female –1<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

ICPL 98001 T 21 ICPL 87 ICPL 332<br />

No-choice Multi-choice<br />

FIGURE 5.2 Oviposition preference by the Helicoverpa armigera females on pigeonpea under no-choice and<br />

multichoice conditions.<br />

and frego-bract are nonpreferred by the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) for<br />

egg laying than the genotypes with normal leaves (Wu, Cai, and Zhang, 1997). Oviposition<br />

nonpreference is also a component of resistance to H. armigera in chickpea (Cowgill and<br />

Lateef, 1996) and pigeonpea (Figure 5.2) (H.C. Sharma et al., 2001; Kumari, Sharma, and Reddy,<br />

2005), and to Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) in tomato (Cosenza and Green, 1979). Both antixenosis<br />

and antibiotic types of resistance have been observed against the pea weevil, Bruchus<br />

pisorum L. (Clement et al., 1994). Nonpreference for feeding and nutritional antibiosis are<br />

major components of resistance in soybean to Epilachna varivestis Mulsant (Kogan, 1982).<br />

Antibiosis<br />

Antibiosis is expressed in terms of larval mortality, decreased larval and pupal weights,<br />

prolonged larval and pupal development, and reduced fecundity. Antibiosis effects are<br />

also expressed in terms of sex ratio and proportion of insects entering diapause. The antibiotic<br />

type of resistance prolongs the generation time, and can reduce the insect population<br />

within a few generations through a cumulative effect on insect survival and development<br />

(Coaker, 1959; Knipling, 1979; Jayaraj, 1982; H.C. Sharma, 1993). Both chemical and morphological<br />

factors mediate antibiosis (Panda and Khush, 1995; H.C. Sharma and Nwanze,<br />

1997; Smith, 2005). Lethal effects may be acute, often affecting young larvae, while chronic<br />

effects lead to mortality of older larvae, pupae, and adults (H.C. Sharma, Vidyasagar, and<br />

Subramanian, 1993; H.C. Sharma and Nwanze, 1997; H.C. Sharma et al., 2001; Smith, 2005;<br />

Stevenson et al., 2005). Individuals surviving the direct effects of antibiosis may have<br />

reduced body weight, a prolonged period of development, and reduced fecundity.<br />

Antibiosis may also include subchronic effects, such as slow growth rates, poor utilization<br />

of food, and reduced fecundity (Reese and Beck, 1976).<br />

Antibiosis is an important component of resistance to H. armigera in cotton. Cotton genotypes<br />

Suvin (Gossypium barbandense L.) and MCU 9 (G. hirsutum L.) are more suitable than<br />

TKHe 44 (G. arboreum L.) for the growth and development of H. armigera (Nanthagopal and<br />

Uthamasamy, 1989). Net reproductive rate, intrinsic rate of increase, and fecundity have<br />

been found to be relatively lower on cotton genotypes LK 861 and LPS 141 as compared to<br />

MCU 5 (Rao and Prasad, 1996). There is a large variation in larval survival, larval and<br />

pupal weights, egg viability, and longevity of H. armigera adults when reared on different<br />

chickpea genotypes (Srivastava and Srivastava, 1990). Life table analysis suggested that<br />

there is considerable variation in net reproductive rate (142.1 to 268.6), mean generation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!