06.07.2013 Views

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Host Plant Resistance to Insects: Potential and Limitations 99<br />

chickpea in combination with natural enemies (e.g., Campoletis chlorideae Uchida) can exercise<br />

considerable effect on population dynamics of the pod borer, H. armigera. If we assume<br />

that there are 10 female moths per hectare in the beginning of the season, each H. armigera<br />

female lays an average of 500 eggs, and there are three generations in a cropping season,<br />

the larval parasite, C. chlorideae results in 20% H. armigera mortality in each generation<br />

(Romeis and Shanower, 1996), and the H. armigera larval mortality is 15% in ICCC 37, 35%<br />

in ICCV 2, and 40% in ICC 506; then there would be 98,260,000 moths in an area planted<br />

with ICCC 37, 43,940,000 moths in the area planted to ICCV 2, and 34,560,000 moths in<br />

the area planted to the resistant cultivar, ICC 506. As compared to the resistant check,<br />

ICC 506, there would be 2.84 and 1.27 times more moths in the areas planted with ICCC 37<br />

and ICCV 2, respectively. There would be 5.55 times more insects in an area planted with a<br />

susceptible cultivar alone as compared to the areas having a resistant cultivar in combination<br />

with the parasitoid, C. chlorideae. The ratio between H. armigera moth populations<br />

(across cultivars) in areas with different cultivars plus control with the natural enemies as<br />

compared to those with the cultivars alone would be 0.51. Thus, natural enemies in combination<br />

with plant resistance can have a dramatic effect on the population dynamics of<br />

insect pests.<br />

Tritrophic Interactions<br />

Biological control processes involve the tritrophic interactions between the plants, the<br />

target pests, and the natural enemies. These interactions are not limited to the impact of<br />

plant chemicals on the target insect and the effect of insect fi tness on natural enemies, but<br />

also include the direct effects of plants on the natural enemies. The physical or chemical<br />

characteristics of the host plant that infl uence the activity and abundance of natural enemies<br />

involve:<br />

Physical interactions<br />

• Physical protection to herbivores from natural enemies.<br />

• Effect of morphological characteristics of the plants on the activity of natural<br />

enemies.<br />

• Effect of plant phenology on the searching ability of natural enemies.<br />

Chemical interactions<br />

• Effects on fi tness of the insect host.<br />

• Effects on the fi tness of the natural enemies.<br />

• Effects on the acceptability of the insect host to the natural enemies.<br />

• Effects on the ratio between insects and the natural enemies.<br />

• Plant chemicals acting as kairomones or allomones to the natural enemies.<br />

It is very likely that plants have evolved mechanisms to attract the natural enemies to<br />

reduce the extent of insect damage, for example, the female parasitoid wasp, Campoletis<br />

sonorensis (Cam.) responds to the volatiles of cotton plant over a short distance, while<br />

searching for its prey, H. virescens. It is easier for the wasp to fi nd the host habitat fi rst<br />

and then the prey within the vicinity of the host plant. Tobacco, cotton, and maize plants

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!