06.07.2013 Views

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

Contents - Faperta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Host Plant Resistance to Insects: Potential and Limitations 95<br />

varieties have been deployed for the control of a number of insect pests worldwide (Painter,<br />

1951; Maxwell and Jennings, 1980; Smith, 1989, 2005; Sharma and Ortiz, 2002). Several<br />

insect pests have been kept under check through the use of insect-resistant cultivars. The<br />

major examples include:<br />

• Grapevine rootstocks from the United States, resistant to phylloxera, Phylloxera<br />

vitifoliae (Fitch.) (Painter, 1951; Adkisson and Dyck, 1980).<br />

• Cotton cultivars Krishna, Mahalaxmi, Khandwa 2, and MCU 5, resistant to leafhopper,<br />

A. biguttula biguttula (Sundramurthy and Chitra, 1992).<br />

• Northern Spy rootstocks of apple, resistant to wooly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum<br />

(Hausm.) (Martin, 1973).<br />

• Wheat varieties Pawnee, Poso 42, and Benhur, resistant to Hessian fl y, M. destructor<br />

(Maxwell, Jenkins, and Parrot, 1972).<br />

• Rice varieties IR 36, Kakatiya, Surekha, and Rajendradhan, resistant to gall midge,<br />

O. oryzae (Kalode, 1987).<br />

• Alfalfa varieties Lahontan, Sonora, and Sirsa 9, resistant to spotted alfalfa aphid,<br />

T. maculata (Howe and Smith, 1957; Hunt et al., 1966).<br />

• Sorghum varieties Maldandi, Swati, ICSV 705, ICSV 700, CISV 708, IS 18551, and<br />

SFCR 151, resistant to sorghum shoot fl y, A. soccata (Figure 4.6); DJ 6514, TAM 2577,<br />

AF 28, ICSV 745 (Figure 4.7) and ICSV 88032, resistant to sorghum midge, S. sorghicola<br />

(Figure 4.8) (Agrawal, Sharma, and Leuschner, 1987; Sharma et al., 1994a,<br />

1994b, 2005g; Sharma, 2001; Agrawal et al., 2005); and CSM 388 and Malisor 84-7,<br />

resistant to head bug, Eurystylus oldi (Pop.) (Sharma, 1993; Sharma, Lopez, and<br />

Vidyasagar, 1994; Sharma et al., 2005g).<br />

• Pigeonpea varieties ICPL 332 and ICPL 88039, resistant to H. armigera.<br />

• Chickpea varieties ICC 506 and ICCV 10, resistant to H. armigera (Sharma et al.,<br />

2005b).<br />

The benefi ts of HPR depend on the pattern of insect invasion, for example, many insects,<br />

such as aphids, whitefl ies, and mites, invade the crop in low numbers, and their abundance<br />

increases over several generations before reaching the economic threshold levels.<br />

Deadhearts (%)<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

ICSV 705<br />

ICSV 700<br />

ICSV 708<br />

PS 30710<br />

IS 18551<br />

SFCR 151<br />

SFCR 125<br />

ICSV 91011<br />

CS 3541<br />

MR 750<br />

ICSV 745<br />

FIGURE 4.6 Expression of resistance to sorghum shoot fl y, Atherigona soccata in sorghum.<br />

Swarna

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!