03.07.2013 Views

Primordial Black Holes and Cosmological Phase Transitions Report ...

Primordial Black Holes and Cosmological Phase Transitions Report ...

Primordial Black Holes and Cosmological Phase Transitions Report ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PBHs <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cosmological</strong> <strong>Phase</strong> <strong>Transitions</strong> 195<br />

log 10Βtk<br />

0<br />

-20<br />

-40<br />

-60<br />

-80<br />

n1.36, log 10t1s9<br />

-14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4<br />

log10 tk<br />

<br />

1 s <br />

Figure 107: The fraction of the universe going into PBHs in a universe with<br />

a running–tilt power spectrum when n+ =1.36 <strong>and</strong> t+ = 10 −9 s. The curves<br />

represent the contribution from the EW phase transition (red), from the QCD<br />

phase transition (blue, Bag Model) <strong>and</strong> from radiation (black). The maroon<br />

line represents the observational constraints, which are violated here by the<br />

EW phase transition contribution.<br />

then this case becomes valid, with a possible contribution also from the QCD<br />

transition (Bag Model).<br />

There are a few cases for which the contribution from radiation is negligible<br />

(i.e., cases shown in cyan on Table 42) but with an appreciable contribution<br />

from the EW phase transition. These cases are labeled on Table 47 with ‘E’,<br />

‘BE’ <strong>and</strong> ‘BLE’. In Figures 108a <strong>and</strong> 108b we present, as examples, the cases<br />

t+ = 10 −10 s <strong>and</strong> n+ =1.28, <strong>and</strong> t+ = 10 −9 s <strong>and</strong> n+ =1.32, with, respectively,<br />

βmax ∼ 10 −60 <strong>and</strong> βmax ∼ 10 −23 .<br />

There are also a lot of cases for which we have a contribution from the<br />

EW phase transition as well as from radiation (cf. Table 47, labeled ‘RE’). In<br />

Figures 108c <strong>and</strong> 108d, we show as examples of this, the cases t+ = 10 −13 s<br />

<strong>and</strong> n+ =1.32, <strong>and</strong> t+ = 10 −12 s <strong>and</strong> n+ =1.34. Notice that in both cases the<br />

two contributions are quite comparable (in terms of βmax). In the first case we<br />

have βmax ∼ 10 −24 from radiation <strong>and</strong> βmax ∼ 10 −28 from the EW transition,<br />

<strong>and</strong> in the second case we have βmax ∼ 10 −18 from radiation <strong>and</strong> βmax ∼ 10 −12<br />

from the EW transition.<br />

In Figures 108e <strong>and</strong> 108f we present two mores cases with contributions<br />

from radiation <strong>and</strong> from the EW phase transition. Notice that in these cases<br />

the contribution from the EW phase transition is a lot more relevant than<br />

the contribution from radiation. For example, in the case t+ = 10 −10 s <strong>and</strong><br />

n+ = 1.32, represented in Figure 108f, we have that the contribution from<br />

radiation gives βmax ∼ 10 −71 <strong>and</strong> the contribution from the EW transition

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!