03.07.2013 Views

Primordial Black Holes and Cosmological Phase Transitions Report ...

Primordial Black Holes and Cosmological Phase Transitions Report ...

Primordial Black Holes and Cosmological Phase Transitions Report ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PBHs <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cosmological</strong> <strong>Phase</strong> <strong>Transitions</strong> 176<br />

In Sections 11.1 to 11.5 we made use of a few abreviations concerning different<br />

contributions to β(tk). We list these abreviations in Table 41. For example,<br />

RBE, represents a case for which there are non–negligible contributions from<br />

radiation (R), from the QCD Bag Model (B), <strong>and</strong> from the EW Bag Model<br />

(E) but with negligible contributions from the electron–positron annihilation as<br />

well as from the QCD Lattice Fit <strong>and</strong> from the QCD Crossover (if one chooses<br />

one of these models instead of the Bag Model).<br />

We might have also situations with one or more contributions exceeding the<br />

observational limits (these are labeled with an ∗). For exeample, RB ∗ LCE ∗ ,<br />

represents a case for which we have, besides the contribution from radiation R,<br />

contributions from the QCD Lattice Fit (L) or from the QCD Crossover (C).<br />

The QCD Bag Model is excluded due to observational constraints (B ∗ ). The<br />

same happens for the EW Bag Model (E ∗ ). The contribution from the electron–<br />

positron annihilation epoch is negligible in this case.<br />

11.1 Radiation–dominated universe<br />

In this section we determine the fraction of the universe going into PBHs at<br />

different epochs for a radiation–dominated universe with a running–tilt power<br />

spectrum (Section 10). We consider, for t+, all orders of magnitude between<br />

10 −23 s (end of inflation) <strong>and</strong> 10 8 s. We are interested in a blue spectrum, i.e,<br />

a spectrum for which n>1. In fact, if we want to have interesting values for<br />

β, then we should have, at least, n 1.22. As an upper limit we consider<br />

n ≈ 2.0. This corresponds to a cut–off at tk ∼ 10 5 s (see Figure 93) which<br />

excludes PBHs with masses larger than ∼ 10 10 M⊙ (which is equivalent to the<br />

mass of the present day largest Supermassive <strong>Black</strong> Hole (SMBH) c<strong>and</strong>idates;<br />

e.g. Natarajan & Treister, 2008).<br />

Each pair of the form (t+, nmax) determines a different location <strong>and</strong> a different<br />

value for the maximum value of β(tk). In general one of three things might<br />

occur:<br />

(1) β(tk) exceeds the observational constraints ⇒ the pair (t+, nmax) must<br />

be rejected.<br />

(2) β(tk) is negligible (< 10 −100 ) for all values of tk, in which case we take<br />

β(tk) = 0.<br />

(3) β(tk) is always bellow the observational constraints <strong>and</strong>, at least during<br />

some epoch, above 10 −100 ; these are the cases of interest to us.<br />

Let us consider, as an example, the case n =1.30. If t+ = 10 −17 s, then<br />

β(tk) exceeds the observational constraints as it is clear from Figure 94. On the<br />

other h<strong>and</strong>, if t+ = 10 −16 s we obtain a valid curve for β(tk) (see Figure 95)<br />

with βmax ∼ 10 −17 . As one moves t+ to later epochs the value of βmax becomes<br />

smaller (see Figure 95) until, for t+ = 10 −10 s, we reach βmax ∼ 10 −133 (see<br />

Figure 96). Thus, we consider that, in the case of n =1.30, there is a window

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!