03.07.2013 Views

Primordial Black Holes and Cosmological Phase Transitions Report ...

Primordial Black Holes and Cosmological Phase Transitions Report ...

Primordial Black Holes and Cosmological Phase Transitions Report ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PBHs <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cosmological</strong> <strong>Phase</strong> <strong>Transitions</strong> 171<br />

2004). Here, we consider a running–tilt power–law spectrum n(k) in the form<br />

(see Sobrinho & Augusto, 2007)<br />

n(k) =n0 + n1<br />

2<br />

k<br />

ln +<br />

kc<br />

n2<br />

<br />

ln<br />

6<br />

k<br />

2 +<br />

kc<br />

n3<br />

<br />

ln<br />

24<br />

k<br />

3 kc<br />

(283)<br />

which is an expansion of equation (278) up to i = 4.<br />

The simplest models of inflation suggest that the coefficients ni scale as powers<br />

ɛi of some slow–roll parameter ɛ ≈ 0.1. This means that the expansion (283)<br />

can be expected to be accurate to 10% for about 16 e–foldings around the pivot<br />

scale (e.g. Düchting, 2004). This implies sensitivity down to horizon masses of<br />

∼ 10M⊙. For scales probing the QCD epoch, the accuracy of expression (283)<br />

is reduced to 20−30% <strong>and</strong> in the case of the EW epoch the case is by far worse.<br />

In that cases we will regard expression (283) as a phenomenological one.<br />

If one wants to have a significant number of PBHs produced at some epoch,<br />

then one needs to have a spectrum with more power on that particular epoch.<br />

In practice this is done introducing some fine–tunning into the spectrum (e.g.<br />

Sobrinho & Augusto, 2007). In our case, this fine–tunning is done by guessing<br />

which set of values for n2 <strong>and</strong> n3 would lead to interesting results in terms of<br />

PBH production.<br />

Given a location k+ (or, in terms of time t+) to the maximum of n(k) it<br />

turns out that the corresponding value of n3 is given by equation (Sobrinho &<br />

Augusto, 2007).<br />

<br />

4 3n1 +2n2ln n3 = −<br />

k+<br />

<br />

kc<br />

<br />

(284)<br />

3<br />

ln k+<br />

kc<br />

2<br />

where kc is a pivot scale. Inserting this expression of n3 into the expression of<br />

n(k) (Sobrinho & Augusto, 2007, equation 150) with k = k+ <strong>and</strong> n(k+) =nmax<br />

we obtain for n2 the expression<br />

<br />

6 3n0 − 3nmax + n1 ln<br />

n2 = −<br />

k+<br />

<br />

kc<br />

2 . (285)<br />

ln k+<br />

kc<br />

On Sobrinho & Augusto (2007, Table 7) we have already presented the values of<br />

n2 <strong>and</strong> n3 for different locations of the maximum k+ <strong>and</strong> for different values of<br />

nmax. We have also presented the corresponding graphics with the curves n(k)<br />

(Figures 69 to 74 from Sobrinho & Augusto, 2007). However, those values were<br />

determined without taking into account the influence of a positive cosmological<br />

constant Λ (cf. Section 1.5), which might be used when one converts an instant<br />

of time tk to the corresponding wavenumber k by means of equation (203).<br />

On Table 39 we present, as an example, the values for n2 <strong>and</strong> n3 for the case<br />

nmax =1.4. Notice that these set of values are model independent in the case<br />

of phase transitions. On Figure 91 we show the curves n2(t+) <strong>and</strong> n3(t+) for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!