03.07.2013 Views

Choosing the Right Client Computing Platform For Public Sector - Intel

Choosing the Right Client Computing Platform For Public Sector - Intel

Choosing the Right Client Computing Platform For Public Sector - Intel

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

* O<strong>the</strong>r names and brands may be<br />

claimed as <strong>the</strong> property of o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />

Note: Performance tests and ratings<br />

are measured using specific computer<br />

systems and/or components and<br />

reflect <strong>the</strong> approximate performance<br />

of <strong>Intel</strong> products as measured by<br />

those tests. Any difference in system<br />

hardware or software design or<br />

configuration may affect actual<br />

performance. Buyers should consult<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r sources of information to<br />

evaluate <strong>the</strong> performance of systems<br />

or components <strong>the</strong>y are considering<br />

purchasing. <strong>For</strong> more information<br />

on performance tests and on <strong>the</strong><br />

performance of <strong>Intel</strong> products, visit<br />

http://www.intel.com/performance.<br />

intel’s Previous generation Products Supersede<br />

Phenom* in Power and Performance<br />

According to several independent studies, <strong>Intel</strong>’s previous generation products have outperformed Phenom* both in terms of power and<br />

performance. Here is what several reviewers had to say about <strong>the</strong> comparison:<br />

• “The fastest triple-core CPU is on par with <strong>Intel</strong>'s dual-core E4700.” - AnandTech*, 23 April 2008 LINK<br />

• “The three cores simply aren't quick enough, individually, to make this triple-core product look appealing.”<br />

- Tech Report*, 23 April 2008 LINK<br />

• “Today, we're having to conclude that AMD*'s tri-core Phenom* X3 8750 is no match for <strong>Intel</strong>'s Core 2 Quad Q6600, and<br />

barely a threat to <strong>Intel</strong>'s Core 2 Duo E8200.” - Hexus.net*, 23 April 2008 LINK<br />

• "... from <strong>the</strong> economical standpoint new Phenom* X3 family still fails to compete with <strong>Intel</strong> processors."<br />

- X-bit Labs*, 22 April 2008 LINK<br />

Figure 12. SYSmark* 2007 – Overall comparison Figure 13. Load System Power Consumption<br />

SYSmark* 2007 – Overall<br />

Score in SYSmarks (Higher is Better)<br />

<strong>Intel</strong>® Core 2 Duo E8400 (3.00GHz)<br />

<strong>Intel</strong>® Core 2 Duo E6850 (3.00GHz)<br />

<strong>Intel</strong>® Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.40GHz)<br />

<strong>Intel</strong>® Core 2 Duo E7200 (2.53GHz)<br />

AMD* Phenom* X4 9750 (2.4GHz)<br />

<strong>Intel</strong>® Core 2 Duo E6550 (2.33GHz)<br />

<strong>Intel</strong>® Core 2 Duo E4700 (2.60GHz)<br />

AMD* Phenom* X3 8750 (2.4GHz)<br />

AMD* Athlon* X2 6000+ (3.0GHz)<br />

AMD* Phenom* X3 8650 (2.3GHz)<br />

AMD* Athlon* X2 5600+ (2.8GHz)<br />

AMD* Phenom* X3 8450 (2.1GHz)<br />

132<br />

126<br />

126<br />

122<br />

122<br />

117<br />

117<br />

111<br />

111<br />

149<br />

143<br />

161<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180<br />

diSPElling COmmOn CliEnt COmPuting miSCOnCEPtiOnS<br />

Load System Power Consumption (WMV Encoding)<br />

Total System Power Consumption in Watts (Lower is Better)<br />

<strong>Intel</strong>® Core 2 Duo E7200 (2.53GHz)<br />

<strong>Intel</strong>® Core 2 Duo E4700 (2.60GHz)<br />

<strong>Intel</strong>® Core 2 Duo E6550 (2.33GHz)<br />

<strong>Intel</strong>® Core 2 Duo E8400 (3.00GHz)<br />

<strong>Intel</strong>® Core 2 Duo E6850 (3.00GHz)<br />

<strong>Intel</strong>® Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.40GHz)<br />

AMD* Phenom* X3 8750 (2.4GHz)<br />

AMD* Athlon* X2 6000+ (3.0GHz)<br />

AMD* Phenom* X4 9750 (2.4GHz)<br />

86<br />

101<br />

102<br />

104<br />

118<br />

125<br />

148<br />

166<br />

209<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250<br />

Source for graphs: http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3293&p=1<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!