the effect of the particle size distribution on non-newtonian turbulent ...
the effect of the particle size distribution on non-newtonian turbulent ... the effect of the particle size distribution on non-newtonian turbulent ...
Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.26 _1 =-410g [ k]. If 3,7 D 2.10.4 Partially Developed Rough Wall Turbulence (2.48) The transitional flow between smooth and rough pipes as shown in Figure 2.10 was investigated by Colebrook and White (Colebrook, 1939). The following empirical equation was proposed: If 1 [ k = -4 log 3,7 D 2.10.5 Moody Diagram + 1,26] Re If (2.49) Moody (1944) was
- Page 1 and 2: THE EFFECT OF THE PARTICLE SIZE DIS
- Page 3 and 4: Preamble DECLARATION Page iii I, Ga
- Page 5 and 6: Preamble ACKNOWLEDGEMENrS Page v I
- Page 7: Preamble Page vii CHAPTER 1: INTROD
- Page 10 and 11: Preamble 3.8 Experimental Procedure
- Page 12 and 13: Preamble Page xii LIST OF FIGURES P
- Page 14: Preamble Page xiv 4.5 Optimum repre
- Page 17 and 18: Preamble NOMENCLATURE Svrnbol Descr
- Page 19 and 20: Preamble T shear stress Pa T y yiel
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter I For example: Introduction
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 1 Introduction Page 1.5 1.3
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER 2
- Page 33: Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.
- Page 36: Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.
- Page 39: Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.
- Page 46 and 47: Chapter 2 Literature Review Viscous
- Page 48 and 49: Chapter 2 Literature Review • ..P
- Page 56: Chapter 2 2.11.1 Literature Review
- Page 59: Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.
- Page 62 and 63: Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.
- Page 64: Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.
- Page 69: Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.
- Page 72 and 73: Chapter 2 2.14.2 Literature Review
- Page 74 and 75: CHAPTER 3
- Page 77: Chapter 3 Experimental Work Figure
- Page 80 and 81: Chapter 3 Experimental Work Page 3.
- Page 82 and 83: Chapter 3 Experimental Work Figure
- Page 85: Chapter 3 Experimental Work Page 3.
- Page 88: Chapter 3 Experimental Work Page 3.
- Page 92 and 93: Chapter 3 Experimental Work Page 3.
- Page 96: Chapter 3 Experimental Work Page 3.
- Page 99: CHAPTER 4
Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.26<br />
_1 =-410g [ k].<br />
If 3,7 D<br />
2.10.4 Partially Developed Rough Wall Turbulence<br />
(2.48)<br />
The transiti<strong>on</strong>al flow between smooth and rough pipes as shown in Figure 2.10 was<br />
investigated by Colebrook and White (Colebrook, 1939). The following empirical equati<strong>on</strong><br />
was proposed:<br />
If 1 [ k<br />
= -4 log 3,7 D<br />
2.10.5 Moody Diagram<br />
+ 1,26]<br />
Re If<br />
(2.49)<br />
Moody (1944) was <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first to present a composite diagram <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> regi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> interest for<br />
Newt<strong>on</strong>ian flow in pipes. The chart, termed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Moody diagram, as shown in Figure 2.10,<br />
represents <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Re and kiD <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fricti<strong>on</strong> factor and includes:<br />
2.11<br />
•<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> straight line laminar fricti<strong>on</strong> factor curve<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> smooth pipe <strong>turbulent</strong> fricti<strong>on</strong> factor curve<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> various fully rough <strong>turbulent</strong> fricti<strong>on</strong> factor curves<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> transiti<strong>on</strong> fricti<strong>on</strong> factors<br />
NON-NEWTONIAN TURBULENT FLOW MODELS<br />
Data obtained by Slatter (1994) was analyzed and compared using his new model with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Torrance (1963) and Wils<strong>on</strong> & Thomas (1985, 1987) models, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>oretical models which have<br />
a str<strong>on</strong>ger analytical background. It was decided to use <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se two models for analysis and<br />
comparis<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> data for this <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>sis seeing that this is a c<strong>on</strong>tinuati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> work c<strong>on</strong>ducted by<br />
Slatter (1994). It was, however, also decided to incorporate into <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> models <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Dodge & Metzner (1959) and Kemblowski & Kolodziejski (1973), models having a more and<br />
empirical approach.