the effect of the particle size distribution on non-newtonian turbulent ...

the effect of the particle size distribution on non-newtonian turbulent ... the effect of the particle size distribution on non-newtonian turbulent ...

digitalknowledge.cput.ac.za
from digitalknowledge.cput.ac.za More from this publisher
03.07.2013 Views

Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.26 _1 =-410g [ k]. If 3,7 D 2.10.4 Partially Developed Rough Wall Turbulence (2.48) The transitional flow between smooth and rough pipes as shown in Figure 2.10 was investigated by Colebrook and White (Colebrook, 1939). The following empirical equation was proposed: If 1 [ k = -4 log 3,7 D 2.10.5 Moody Diagram + 1,26] Re If (2.49) Moody (1944) was ong>theong> first to present a composite diagram ong>ofong> all ong>theong> regions ong>ofong> interest for Newtonian flow in pipes. The chart, termed ong>theong> Moody diagram, as shown in Figure 2.10, represents ong>theong> ong>effectong> ong>ofong> Re and kiD on ong>theong> friction factor and includes: 2.11 • ong>theong> straight line laminar friction factor curve ong>theong> smooth pipe turbulent friction factor curve ong>theong> various fully rough turbulent friction factor curves ong>theong> transition friction factors NON-NEWTONIAN TURBULENT FLOW MODELS Data obtained by Slatter (1994) was analyzed and compared using his new model with ong>theong> Torrance (1963) and Wilson & Thomas (1985, 1987) models, ong>theong>oretical models which have a stronger analytical background. It was decided to use ong>theong>se two models for analysis and comparison ong>ofong> data for this ong>theong>sis seeing that this is a continuation ong>ofong> work conducted by Slatter (1994). It was, however, also decided to incorporate into ong>theong> analysis ong>theong> models ong>ofong> Dodge & Metzner (1959) and Kemblowski & Kolodziejski (1973), models having a more and empirical approach.

Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.26<br />

_1 =-410g [ k].<br />

If 3,7 D<br />

2.10.4 Partially Developed Rough Wall Turbulence<br />

(2.48)<br />

The transiti<strong>on</strong>al flow between smooth and rough pipes as shown in Figure 2.10 was<br />

investigated by Colebrook and White (Colebrook, 1939). The following empirical equati<strong>on</strong><br />

was proposed:<br />

If 1 [ k<br />

= -4 log 3,7 D<br />

2.10.5 Moody Diagram<br />

+ 1,26]<br />

Re If<br />

(2.49)<br />

Moody (1944) was <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first to present a composite diagram <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> regi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> interest for<br />

Newt<strong>on</strong>ian flow in pipes. The chart, termed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Moody diagram, as shown in Figure 2.10,<br />

represents <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Re and kiD <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fricti<strong>on</strong> factor and includes:<br />

2.11<br />

•<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> straight line laminar fricti<strong>on</strong> factor curve<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> smooth pipe <strong>turbulent</strong> fricti<strong>on</strong> factor curve<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> various fully rough <strong>turbulent</strong> fricti<strong>on</strong> factor curves<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> transiti<strong>on</strong> fricti<strong>on</strong> factors<br />

NON-NEWTONIAN TURBULENT FLOW MODELS<br />

Data obtained by Slatter (1994) was analyzed and compared using his new model with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Torrance (1963) and Wils<strong>on</strong> & Thomas (1985, 1987) models, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>oretical models which have<br />

a str<strong>on</strong>ger analytical background. It was decided to use <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se two models for analysis and<br />

comparis<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> data for this <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>sis seeing that this is a c<strong>on</strong>tinuati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> work c<strong>on</strong>ducted by<br />

Slatter (1994). It was, however, also decided to incorporate into <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> models <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Dodge & Metzner (1959) and Kemblowski & Kolodziejski (1973), models having a more and<br />

empirical approach.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!