the effect of the particle size distribution on non-newtonian turbulent ...
the effect of the particle size distribution on non-newtonian turbulent ... the effect of the particle size distribution on non-newtonian turbulent ...
Appendix B Conference Paper 2.4.6.3 Representative Particle Size The wall roughness and
Appendix B Conference Paper IfRe, < 3,32
- Page 200: Appendix A Detailed Pipe Test Resul
- Page 204: Appendix A Detailed Pipe Test Resul
- Page 210: Appendix A Detailed Pipe Test Resul
- Page 214: Appendix A Detailed Pipe Test Resul
- Page 220: Appendix A Detailed Pipe Test Resul
- Page 224: Appendix A Detailed Pipe Test Resul
- Page 230: Appendix A Detailed Pipe Test Resul
- Page 234: Appendix A Detailed Pipe Test Resul
- Page 238 and 239: APPENDIXB
- Page 240 and 241: Appendix B Conference Paper ABSTRAC
- Page 242: Appendix B Conference Paper where T
- Page 248 and 249: Appendix B Conference Paper B.IO A
- Page 254: Appendix B Conference Paper 4.3.3 K
- Page 258 and 259: Appendix B Conference Paper s solid
- Page 260: Appendix B Conference Paper B.22 SL
Appendix B C<strong>on</strong>ference Paper<br />
IfRe, < 3,32 <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n smooth wall <strong>turbulent</strong> flow exists and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mean velocity is given by<br />
:.Y.- = 2,5 In [-!.] + 2,5 In Re + 1,75 .<br />
V. dss • '<br />
If Re,. > 3,32 <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n fully developed rough wall <strong>turbulent</strong> flow exists and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mean<br />
velocity is given by<br />
Y.- [-!.] = 2,5 In +<br />
V. dss<br />
4,75 ,<br />
and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fricti<strong>on</strong> factor is c<strong>on</strong>stant.<br />
This correlati<strong>on</strong> produces a transiti<strong>on</strong> from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> smooth to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> rough flow c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> which<br />
is abrupt.<br />
Tests c<strong>on</strong>ducted by Slatter (1994) c<strong>on</strong>firmed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> model to be more accurate than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Torrance (1963) model and Wils<strong>on</strong> & Thomas (1985, 1987) model, when evaluated<br />
against experimental data.<br />
2.4.7 Data from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Literature<br />
Experimental data obtained by Sive (1988) was used in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> various<br />
models under c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>. The tests c<strong>on</strong>ducted by Sive (1988) were d<strong>on</strong>e using a<br />
mixture <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> kaolin clay and a relatively coarse quartz sand, which resulted in a<br />
heterogeneous, settling slurry. The purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> using this data was to see if <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> coarse,<br />
settling <str<strong>on</strong>g>particle</str<strong>on</strong>g>s c<strong>on</strong>tributed to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>turbulent</strong> flow headloss, as proposed by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Slatter<br />
model.<br />
3. EXPERIMENTAL WORK<br />
The test facility at ucr which was used had four different pipe diameters namely<br />
25mm, 80mm, 150mm and 200mm nominal bore and slurries were tested at mean<br />
velocities ranging from 0, Imls to 8m/s. Slurries tested included kaolin clay and mixture<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> kaolin clay and fine sand at varying ratios.<br />
(10)<br />
(11)<br />
(12)<br />
B.9