the effect of the particle size distribution on non-newtonian turbulent ...
the effect of the particle size distribution on non-newtonian turbulent ... the effect of the particle size distribution on non-newtonian turbulent ...
Chapter 4 Results and Analysis Page 4.12 25rnm pipeline (as outlined in Chapter 2) and are presented in Table 4.II toge
- Page 54: Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.
- Page 58 and 59: Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.
- Page 61 and 62: Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.
- Page 66 and 67: Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.
- Page 68 and 69: Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 2 Literature Review 2 o Q2
- Page 73 and 74: Chapter 2 Literature Review Page 2.
- Page 75: 3.1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 3 EXPERIME
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 3 Experimental Work Page 3.
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 3 Experimental Work Page 3.
- Page 83: Chapter 3 Experimental Work Page 3.
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 3 Experimental Work Table 3
- Page 90: Chapter 3 Experimental Work Page 3.
- Page 93: Chapter 3 Experimental Work Page 3.
- Page 98 and 99: Chapter 3 Experimental Work Page 3.
- Page 101: Chapter 4 Results and Analysis Page
- Page 124: Chapter 4 Results and Analysis Page
- Page 127 and 128: CHAPTERS
- Page 129: Chapter 5 Discussion Page 5.2 Fur<s
- Page 132 and 133: Chapter 5 Table 5.1. Discussion Pag
- Page 136 and 137: Chapter 5 Discussion Page 5.9 5.7 T
- Page 140 and 141: Chapter 5 Discussion Page 5.13 5.7
- Page 142: CHAPTER 6
- Page 147 and 148: REFERENCES
- Page 150: References Page R.3 HANKS R W (1963
Chapter 4 Results and Analysis Page 4.12<br />
25rnm pipeline (as outlined in Chapter 2) and are presented in Table 4.II toge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
pseudo-shear diagram <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> rheology <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> test sets for kaolin clay, mixture 1 and mixture<br />
2 in Figure 4.13 to Figure 4.15.<br />
The rheological parameters obtained were used to analyze <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> test data using <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>oretical<br />
models menti<strong>on</strong>ed in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> literature review.<br />
* - Sive rheoloo ..y for kaolin <strong>on</strong>l<br />
Table 4.II: Summary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Slurry Properties<br />
No Test Set Slurry c,,(%) TycPa) K(Pa.s O ) n S,<br />
I Sivel * Kaolin/Quartz 7,L 4,89 0,2991 0,4840 2,22<br />
3K 10 Kaolin 7,00 9,14 0,0676 0,645E 2,60<br />
4K 20 Kaolin 6,16 5,80 0,0176 0,8154 2,60<br />
5RF 10 Kaolin/Rock Flour 9,6, 3,68 0,0132 0,9474 2,60<br />
6RF_20 Kaolin/Rock Flour 11,00 3,91 0,0105 0,9720 2,60<br />
7RF_30 Kaolin/Rock Flour 13,29 5,53 0,0194 0,964E 2,60<br />
8S 10 Kaolin/Rock Flour/Sand 16,4, 5,82 0,1413 0,557, 2,65<br />
9S 20 Kaolin/Rock Flour/Sand 19,43 5,48 0,1239 0,6363 2,65<br />
10 S_30 Kaolin/Rock Flour/Sand 23,86 8,02 0,1350 0,5911 2,65<br />
4.4 VISCOUS SUB-LAYER<br />
y<br />
The viscous sub-layer thickness can be predicted using <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Newt<strong>on</strong>ian approximati<strong>on</strong> and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Wils<strong>on</strong> & Thomas (1985,1987) and Slatter (1994) models. Figure 4.16 to Figure 4.18 show<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> relati<strong>on</strong>ship between wall shear stress and viscous sub-layer thickness for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first test<br />
sets <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> kaolin clay, mixture I and mixture 2 respectively. The Maude & Whitmore (1958)<br />
predicti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> viscous sub-layer thickness has been included in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> figures. Figure 4.18<br />
shows that at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> higher wall shear stress values, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> viscous sub-layer thickness is less than<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> diameter <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> larger <str<strong>on</strong>g>particle</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. As discussed in Chapter 2, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>particle</str<strong>on</strong>g>s must <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore<br />
have an obstructing <str<strong>on</strong>g>effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> viscous sub-layer thus influencing <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>turbulent</strong> flow<br />
behaViour.