the effect of the particle size distribution on non-newtonian turbulent ...

the effect of the particle size distribution on non-newtonian turbulent ... the effect of the particle size distribution on non-newtonian turbulent ...

digitalknowledge.cput.ac.za
from digitalknowledge.cput.ac.za More from this publisher
03.07.2013 Views

Chapter 4 Results and Analysis Page 4.12 25rnm pipeline (as outlined in Chapter 2) and are presented in Table 4.II togeong>theong>r with ong>theong> pseudo-shear diagram ong>ofong> ong>theong> rheology ong>ofong> ong>theong> test sets for kaolin clay, mixture 1 and mixture 2 in Figure 4.13 to Figure 4.15. The rheological parameters obtained were used to analyze ong>theong> test data using ong>theong> ong>theong>oretical models mentioned in ong>theong> literature review. * - Sive rheoloo ..y for kaolin onl Table 4.II: Summary ong>ofong> Slurry Properties No Test Set Slurry c,,(%) TycPa) K(Pa.s O ) n S, I Sivel * Kaolin/Quartz 7,L 4,89 0,2991 0,4840 2,22 3K 10 Kaolin 7,00 9,14 0,0676 0,645E 2,60 4K 20 Kaolin 6,16 5,80 0,0176 0,8154 2,60 5RF 10 Kaolin/Rock Flour 9,6, 3,68 0,0132 0,9474 2,60 6RF_20 Kaolin/Rock Flour 11,00 3,91 0,0105 0,9720 2,60 7RF_30 Kaolin/Rock Flour 13,29 5,53 0,0194 0,964E 2,60 8S 10 Kaolin/Rock Flour/Sand 16,4, 5,82 0,1413 0,557, 2,65 9S 20 Kaolin/Rock Flour/Sand 19,43 5,48 0,1239 0,6363 2,65 10 S_30 Kaolin/Rock Flour/Sand 23,86 8,02 0,1350 0,5911 2,65 4.4 VISCOUS SUB-LAYER y The viscous sub-layer thickness can be predicted using ong>theong> Newtonian approximation and ong>theong> Wilson & Thomas (1985,1987) and Slatter (1994) models. Figure 4.16 to Figure 4.18 show ong>theong> relationship between wall shear stress and viscous sub-layer thickness for ong>theong> first test sets ong>ofong> kaolin clay, mixture I and mixture 2 respectively. The Maude & Whitmore (1958) prediction ong>ofong> ong>theong> viscous sub-layer thickness has been included in ong>theong> figures. Figure 4.18 shows that at ong>theong> higher wall shear stress values, ong>theong> viscous sub-layer thickness is less than ong>theong> diameter ong>ofong> ong>theong> larger ong>particleong>s. As discussed in Chapter 2, ong>theong> ong>particleong>s must ong>theong>refore have an obstructing ong>effectong> on ong>theong> viscous sub-layer thus influencing ong>theong> turbulent flow behaViour.

Chapter 4 Results and Analysis Page 4.12<br />

25rnm pipeline (as outlined in Chapter 2) and are presented in Table 4.II toge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

pseudo-shear diagram <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> rheology <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> test sets for kaolin clay, mixture 1 and mixture<br />

2 in Figure 4.13 to Figure 4.15.<br />

The rheological parameters obtained were used to analyze <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> test data using <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>oretical<br />

models menti<strong>on</strong>ed in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> literature review.<br />

* - Sive rheoloo ..y for kaolin <strong>on</strong>l<br />

Table 4.II: Summary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Slurry Properties<br />

No Test Set Slurry c,,(%) TycPa) K(Pa.s O ) n S,<br />

I Sivel * Kaolin/Quartz 7,L 4,89 0,2991 0,4840 2,22<br />

3K 10 Kaolin 7,00 9,14 0,0676 0,645E 2,60<br />

4K 20 Kaolin 6,16 5,80 0,0176 0,8154 2,60<br />

5RF 10 Kaolin/Rock Flour 9,6, 3,68 0,0132 0,9474 2,60<br />

6RF_20 Kaolin/Rock Flour 11,00 3,91 0,0105 0,9720 2,60<br />

7RF_30 Kaolin/Rock Flour 13,29 5,53 0,0194 0,964E 2,60<br />

8S 10 Kaolin/Rock Flour/Sand 16,4, 5,82 0,1413 0,557, 2,65<br />

9S 20 Kaolin/Rock Flour/Sand 19,43 5,48 0,1239 0,6363 2,65<br />

10 S_30 Kaolin/Rock Flour/Sand 23,86 8,02 0,1350 0,5911 2,65<br />

4.4 VISCOUS SUB-LAYER<br />

y<br />

The viscous sub-layer thickness can be predicted using <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Newt<strong>on</strong>ian approximati<strong>on</strong> and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Wils<strong>on</strong> & Thomas (1985,1987) and Slatter (1994) models. Figure 4.16 to Figure 4.18 show<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> relati<strong>on</strong>ship between wall shear stress and viscous sub-layer thickness for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first test<br />

sets <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> kaolin clay, mixture I and mixture 2 respectively. The Maude & Whitmore (1958)<br />

predicti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> viscous sub-layer thickness has been included in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> figures. Figure 4.18<br />

shows that at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> higher wall shear stress values, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> viscous sub-layer thickness is less than<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> diameter <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> larger <str<strong>on</strong>g>particle</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. As discussed in Chapter 2, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>particle</str<strong>on</strong>g>s must <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore<br />

have an obstructing <str<strong>on</strong>g>effect</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> viscous sub-layer thus influencing <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>turbulent</strong> flow<br />

behaViour.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!