02.07.2013 Views

Commentary on Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians

Commentary on Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians

Commentary on Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Comm <strong>on</strong> Phil, Col, Thes<br />

which are spurious, <strong>and</strong> were c<strong>on</strong>trived by ignorant m<strong>on</strong>ks 215 , they are not deserving of much<br />

credit am<strong>on</strong>g readers of sound judgment 216<br />

Let us, therefore, inquire as to the thing itself, without taking any false impressi<strong>on</strong> from the<br />

opini<strong>on</strong>s of men. When Paul wrote the First Epistle to the Corinthians, he was, as he menti<strong>on</strong>s, at<br />

that time unmarried.<br />

“To the unmarried,” says he, “<strong>and</strong> widows, I say it is good that they should c<strong>on</strong>tinue even as I<br />

am” (1 Corinthians 7:8.)<br />

He wrote that Epistle at Ephesus 217 when he was prepared to leave it. Not l<strong>on</strong>g after, he proceeded<br />

to Jerusalem, where he was put in pris<strong>on</strong>, <strong>and</strong> sent to Rome. Every <strong>on</strong>e must perceive how unsuitable<br />

a period of time it would have been for marrying a wife, spent by him partly in journeying, <strong>and</strong><br />

partly in pris<strong>on</strong>. In additi<strong>on</strong> to this, he was even at that time prepared to endure impris<strong>on</strong>ment <strong>and</strong><br />

persecuti<strong>on</strong>s, as he himself testifies, according to Luke. (Acts 21:13.) I am, at the same time, well<br />

aware what objecti<strong>on</strong> is usually brought forward in oppositi<strong>on</strong> to this — that Paul, though married,<br />

refrained from c<strong>on</strong>jugal intercourse. The words, however, c<strong>on</strong>vey another meaning, for he is desirous<br />

that unmarried pers<strong>on</strong>s may have it in their power to remain in the same c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> with himself.<br />

Now, what is that c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> but celibacy? As to their bringing forward that passage —<br />

Is it not lawful for me to lead about a wife (I Corinthians 9:5,)<br />

for the purpose of proving he had a wife, it is too silly to require any refutati<strong>on</strong> 218 . But granting<br />

that Paul was married, how came his wife to be at Philippi — a city which we do not read of his<br />

entering <strong>on</strong> more than two occasi<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> in which it is probable he never remained so much as<br />

two whole m<strong>on</strong>ths? In fine, nothing is more unlikely than that he speaks here of his wife; <strong>and</strong> to<br />

me it does not seem probable that he speaks of any female. I leave it, however, to the judgment of<br />

my readers. The word which Paul makes use of here (συλλάμβανεσθαι) means, to take hold of a<br />

thing <strong>and</strong> embrace it al<strong>on</strong>g with another pers<strong>on</strong>, with the view of giving help 219<br />

Whose names are in the book of life The book of life is the roll of the righteous, who are<br />

predestinated to life, as in the writings of Moses. (Exodus 32:32.) God has this roll beside himself<br />

in safekeeping. Hence the book is nothing else than His eternal counsel, fixed in His own breast.<br />

In place of this term, Ezekiel employs this expressi<strong>on</strong> — the writing of the house of Israel. With<br />

the same view it is said in<br />

Let them be blotted out of the book of the living, <strong>and</strong> let them not be written am<strong>on</strong>g the righteous;<br />

(Psalm 69:28)<br />

that is, let them not be numbered am<strong>on</strong>g the elect of God, whom he receives within the limits<br />

of his Church <strong>and</strong> kingdom 220 .<br />

Should any <strong>on</strong>e allege, that Paul therefore acts rashly in usurping to himself the right of<br />

pr<strong>on</strong>ouncing as to the secrets of God, I answer, that we may in some measure form a judgment<br />

from the token by which God manifests his electi<strong>on</strong>, but <strong>on</strong>ly in so far as our capacity admits. In<br />

215 “Et adioustez a s<strong>on</strong> histoire;” — “And added to his history.”<br />

216 “Ils ne meritent point enuers les lecteurs de b<strong>on</strong> iugement, qu’<strong>on</strong> y adiouste gr<strong>and</strong>e foy;” — “They do not deserve, as to<br />

readers of good judgment, that much credit should be attached to them.”<br />

217 See Calvin <strong>on</strong> the Corinthians, vol. 2, pp. 70, 72, 78.<br />

218 See Calvin <strong>on</strong> the Corinthians, vol. 1, p. 234, 235, 292.<br />

219 It is defined by Wahl, in his Clavis N. T. Philologica, as follows. Una manaum admoveo, i.e. opitulor,opem fero, iuvo; (I<br />

lend a helping h<strong>and</strong>; that is, I assist, I bring assistance, I aid.) — Ed.<br />

220 See Calvin <strong>on</strong> the Psalms, vol. 3, pp. 73, 74.<br />

69<br />

John Calvin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!