02.07.2013 Views

Commentary on Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians

Commentary on Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians

Commentary on Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Comm <strong>on</strong> Phil, Col, Thes<br />

that Paul was descended from the seed of Jacob from the most ancient date, so that he could reck<strong>on</strong><br />

up gr<strong>and</strong>fathers <strong>and</strong> great-gr<strong>and</strong>fathers, <strong>and</strong> could even go still farther back.<br />

According to the law, a Pharisee Having spoken of the nobility of his descent, he now proceeds<br />

to speak of special endowments of pers<strong>on</strong>s, as they are called. It is very generally known, that the<br />

sect of the Pharisees was celebrated above the others for the renown in which it was held for sanctity<br />

<strong>and</strong> for doctrine. He states, that he bel<strong>on</strong>ged to that sect. The comm<strong>on</strong> opini<strong>on</strong> is, that the Pharisees<br />

were so called from a term signifying separati<strong>on</strong> 176 ; but I approve rather of what I learned at <strong>on</strong>e<br />

time from Capito, a man of sacred memory 177 , that it was because they boasted that they were<br />

endowed with the gift of interpreting Scripture, for (parash,) am<strong>on</strong>g the Hebrews, c<strong>on</strong>veys the<br />

idea of interpretati<strong>on</strong>. 178 While others declared themselves to be literals 179 , they preferred to be<br />

regarded as Pharisees 180 , as being in possessi<strong>on</strong> of the interpretati<strong>on</strong>s of the ancients. And assuredly<br />

it is manifest that, under the pretext of antiquity, they corrupted the whole of Scripture by their<br />

inventi<strong>on</strong>s; but as they, at the same time, retained some sound interpretati<strong>on</strong>s, h<strong>and</strong>ed down by the<br />

ancients, they were held in the highest esteem.<br />

But what is meant by the clause, according to the law? For unquesti<strong>on</strong>ably nothing is more<br />

opposed to the law of God than sects, for in it is communicated the truth of God, which is the b<strong>on</strong>d<br />

of unity. Besides this, Josephus tells us in the 13th book of his Antiquities, that all the sects took<br />

their rise during the high priesthood of J<strong>on</strong>athan. Paul employs the term law, not in its strict sense,<br />

to denote the doctrine of religi<strong>on</strong>, however much corrupted it was at that time, as Christianity is at<br />

this day in the Papacy. As, however, there were many that were in the rank of teachers, who were<br />

less skillful, <strong>and</strong> exercised 181 he makes menti<strong>on</strong> also of his zeal. It was, indeed, a very heinous sin<br />

<strong>on</strong> the part of Paul to persecute the Church, but as he had to dispute with unprincipled pers<strong>on</strong>s,<br />

who, by mixing up Christ with Moses, pretended zeal for the law, he menti<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>on</strong> the other h<strong>and</strong>,<br />

that he was so keen a zealot of the law, that <strong>on</strong> that ground he persecuted the Church<br />

6. As to the righteousness which is in the law There can be no doubt he means by this the entire<br />

righteousness of the law, for it were too meagre a sense to underst<strong>and</strong> it exclusively of the<br />

cerem<strong>on</strong>ies. The meaning, therefore, is more general — that he cultivated an integrity of life, such<br />

as might be required <strong>on</strong> the part of a man that was devoted to the law. To this, again, it is objected,<br />

that the righteousness of the law is perfect in the sight of God. For the sum of it is — that men be<br />

fully devoted to God, <strong>and</strong> what bey<strong>on</strong>d this can be desired for the attainment of perfecti<strong>on</strong>? I answer,<br />

that Paul speaks here of that righteousness which would satisfy the comm<strong>on</strong> opini<strong>on</strong> of mankind.<br />

For he separates the law from Christ. Now, what is the law without Christ but a dead letter? To<br />

make the matter plainer, I observe, that there are two righteousnesses of the law. The <strong>on</strong>e is spiritual<br />

— perfect love to God, <strong>and</strong> our neighbors: it is c<strong>on</strong>tained in doctrine, <strong>and</strong> had never an existence<br />

in the life of any man. The other is literal — such as appears in the view of men, while, in the mean<br />

time, hypocrisy reigns in the heart, <strong>and</strong> there is in the sight of God nothing but iniquity. Thus, the<br />

176 “Que les Pharisiens <strong>on</strong>t este ainsi nommez, pource qu’ils estoyent separez d’auec les autres, comme estans saincts;” —<br />

“That the Pharisees were so called, because they were separated from others, as being holy.”<br />

177 See Calvin On the Corinthians, vol. 2, p. 82.<br />

178 The reader will find the etymology of the term Pharisees, discussed at c<strong>on</strong>siderable length in the Harm<strong>on</strong>y, vol. 1, p. 281,<br />

n. 4. — Ed.<br />

179 The meaning is, that in interpreting Scripture, they did not go bey<strong>on</strong>d the bare letter.— Ed.<br />

180 See Harm<strong>on</strong>y, vol. 1, pp. 281, 282, <strong>and</strong> vol. 3, p. 74.<br />

181 “Exercez en l’Ecriture;” — “Exercised in Scripture.”<br />

55<br />

John Calvin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!