02.07.2013 Views

Commentary on Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians

Commentary on Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians

Commentary on Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Comm <strong>on</strong> Phil, Col, Thes<br />

the other by pious zeal, as being desirous to maintain al<strong>on</strong>g with him the defense of the gospel. The<br />

former, he says, do not preach Christ purely, because it was not a right zeal. 68 For the term does<br />

not apply to doctrine, because it is possible that the man who teaches most purely, may, nevertheless,<br />

not be of a sincere mind. 69 Now, that this impurity was in the mind, <strong>and</strong> did not shew itself in<br />

doctrine, may be inferred from the c<strong>on</strong>text. Paul assuredly would have felt no pleasure in seeing<br />

the gospel corrupted; yet he declares that he rejoices in the preaching of those pers<strong>on</strong>s, while it was<br />

not simple or sincere.<br />

It is asked, however, how such preaching could be injurious to him? I answer, that many<br />

occasi<strong>on</strong>s are unknown to us, inasmuch as we are not acquainted with the circumstances of the<br />

times. It is asked farther, “Since the gospel cannot be preached but by those that underst<strong>and</strong> it, what<br />

motive induced those pers<strong>on</strong>s to persecute the doctrine of which they approved?” I answer, that<br />

ambiti<strong>on</strong> is blind, nay, it is a furious beast. Hence it is not to be w<strong>on</strong>dered if false brethren snatch<br />

a weap<strong>on</strong> from the gospel for harassing good <strong>and</strong> pious pastors. 70 Paul, assuredly, says nothing<br />

here 71 of which I have not myself had experience. For there are living at this very day those who<br />

have preached the gospel with no other design, than that they might gratify the rage of the wicked<br />

by persecuting pious pastors. As to Paul’s enemies, it is of importance to observe, if they were<br />

Jews, how mad their hatred was, so as even to forget <strong>on</strong> what account they hated him. For while<br />

they made it their aim to destroy him, they exerted themselves to promote the gospel, <strong>on</strong> account<br />

of which they were hostile to him; but they imagined, no doubt, that the cause of Christ would st<strong>and</strong><br />

or fall 72 in the pers<strong>on</strong> of <strong>on</strong>e individual. If, however, there were envious pers<strong>on</strong>s, 73 who were thus<br />

hurried away by ambiti<strong>on</strong>, we ought to acknowledge the w<strong>on</strong>derful goodness of God, who,<br />

notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing, gave such a prosperous issue to their depraved affecti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

17 That for the defense. Those who truly loved Christ reck<strong>on</strong>ed that it would be a disgrace to<br />

them if they did not associate themselves with Paul as his compani<strong>on</strong>s, when maintaining the cause<br />

of the gospel; <strong>and</strong> we must act in such a manner, as to give a helping h<strong>and</strong>, as far as possible, to<br />

the servants of Christ when in difficulty. 74 Observe, again, this expressi<strong>on</strong> — for the defense of the<br />

gospel For since Christ c<strong>on</strong>fers up<strong>on</strong> us so great an h<strong>on</strong>or, what excuse shall we have, if we shall<br />

be traitors to his cause, 75 or what may we expect, if we betray it by our silence, but that he shall in<br />

return desert our cause, who is our sole Advocate, or Patr<strong>on</strong>, with the Father? 76 (1 John 2:1.)<br />

68 “Pource que leur zele n’estoit pas pur;” — “Because their zeal was not pure.”<br />

69 “Il se pent bien faire, que celuy qui enseignera vne doctrine pure et saine, aura toutesfois vne mauvaise affecti<strong>on</strong>;” — “It<br />

may quite well happen, that the man who teaches pure <strong>and</strong> sound doctrine, will have, nevertheless, an evil dispositi<strong>on</strong>.”<br />

70 “Certes le sainct Apostre ne dit rien yci;” — “Certainly the holy Apostle says nothing here.”<br />

71 “Il ne se faut esbahir si les faux-freres prenent occasi<strong>on</strong> de l’evangile, et s’ils s’en forgent des bast<strong>on</strong>s pour tormenter les<br />

b<strong>on</strong>s et fideles pasteurs;” — “It ought not to appear surprising, if false brethren take occasi<strong>on</strong> from the gospel, <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trive<br />

weap<strong>on</strong>s for themselves for torturing good <strong>and</strong> faithful pastors.”<br />

72 “Mais voyla: il leur sembloit que la doctrine c<strong>on</strong>sistoit ou tomboit bas;” — “But mark! it seemed to them that doctrine stood<br />

or fell.”<br />

73 “Que si c’estoit d’autres que Juifs, ascauoir quelques enuieux de Sainct Paul;” — “But if there were other than Jews —<br />

some that were envious of St. Paul.”<br />

74 “Estans en quelque necessite;” — “When they are in any emergency.”<br />

75 “Praevaricatores ” The term is employed by classical writers in the sense of betraying the cause of <strong>on</strong>e’s client, <strong>and</strong> by<br />

neglect or collusi<strong>on</strong> assisting his opp<strong>on</strong>ent. See Quinct. 9:2. — Ed.<br />

76 “Si nous nous entend<strong>on</strong>s auec la partie aduerse d’iceluy;” — “If we should c<strong>on</strong>nect ourselves with the party opposed to<br />

him.”<br />

21<br />

John Calvin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!