Commentary on Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians
Commentary on Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians
Commentary on Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Comm <strong>on</strong> Phil, Col, Thes<br />
the other by pious zeal, as being desirous to maintain al<strong>on</strong>g with him the defense of the gospel. The<br />
former, he says, do not preach Christ purely, because it was not a right zeal. 68 For the term does<br />
not apply to doctrine, because it is possible that the man who teaches most purely, may, nevertheless,<br />
not be of a sincere mind. 69 Now, that this impurity was in the mind, <strong>and</strong> did not shew itself in<br />
doctrine, may be inferred from the c<strong>on</strong>text. Paul assuredly would have felt no pleasure in seeing<br />
the gospel corrupted; yet he declares that he rejoices in the preaching of those pers<strong>on</strong>s, while it was<br />
not simple or sincere.<br />
It is asked, however, how such preaching could be injurious to him? I answer, that many<br />
occasi<strong>on</strong>s are unknown to us, inasmuch as we are not acquainted with the circumstances of the<br />
times. It is asked farther, “Since the gospel cannot be preached but by those that underst<strong>and</strong> it, what<br />
motive induced those pers<strong>on</strong>s to persecute the doctrine of which they approved?” I answer, that<br />
ambiti<strong>on</strong> is blind, nay, it is a furious beast. Hence it is not to be w<strong>on</strong>dered if false brethren snatch<br />
a weap<strong>on</strong> from the gospel for harassing good <strong>and</strong> pious pastors. 70 Paul, assuredly, says nothing<br />
here 71 of which I have not myself had experience. For there are living at this very day those who<br />
have preached the gospel with no other design, than that they might gratify the rage of the wicked<br />
by persecuting pious pastors. As to Paul’s enemies, it is of importance to observe, if they were<br />
Jews, how mad their hatred was, so as even to forget <strong>on</strong> what account they hated him. For while<br />
they made it their aim to destroy him, they exerted themselves to promote the gospel, <strong>on</strong> account<br />
of which they were hostile to him; but they imagined, no doubt, that the cause of Christ would st<strong>and</strong><br />
or fall 72 in the pers<strong>on</strong> of <strong>on</strong>e individual. If, however, there were envious pers<strong>on</strong>s, 73 who were thus<br />
hurried away by ambiti<strong>on</strong>, we ought to acknowledge the w<strong>on</strong>derful goodness of God, who,<br />
notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing, gave such a prosperous issue to their depraved affecti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
17 That for the defense. Those who truly loved Christ reck<strong>on</strong>ed that it would be a disgrace to<br />
them if they did not associate themselves with Paul as his compani<strong>on</strong>s, when maintaining the cause<br />
of the gospel; <strong>and</strong> we must act in such a manner, as to give a helping h<strong>and</strong>, as far as possible, to<br />
the servants of Christ when in difficulty. 74 Observe, again, this expressi<strong>on</strong> — for the defense of the<br />
gospel For since Christ c<strong>on</strong>fers up<strong>on</strong> us so great an h<strong>on</strong>or, what excuse shall we have, if we shall<br />
be traitors to his cause, 75 or what may we expect, if we betray it by our silence, but that he shall in<br />
return desert our cause, who is our sole Advocate, or Patr<strong>on</strong>, with the Father? 76 (1 John 2:1.)<br />
68 “Pource que leur zele n’estoit pas pur;” — “Because their zeal was not pure.”<br />
69 “Il se pent bien faire, que celuy qui enseignera vne doctrine pure et saine, aura toutesfois vne mauvaise affecti<strong>on</strong>;” — “It<br />
may quite well happen, that the man who teaches pure <strong>and</strong> sound doctrine, will have, nevertheless, an evil dispositi<strong>on</strong>.”<br />
70 “Certes le sainct Apostre ne dit rien yci;” — “Certainly the holy Apostle says nothing here.”<br />
71 “Il ne se faut esbahir si les faux-freres prenent occasi<strong>on</strong> de l’evangile, et s’ils s’en forgent des bast<strong>on</strong>s pour tormenter les<br />
b<strong>on</strong>s et fideles pasteurs;” — “It ought not to appear surprising, if false brethren take occasi<strong>on</strong> from the gospel, <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trive<br />
weap<strong>on</strong>s for themselves for torturing good <strong>and</strong> faithful pastors.”<br />
72 “Mais voyla: il leur sembloit que la doctrine c<strong>on</strong>sistoit ou tomboit bas;” — “But mark! it seemed to them that doctrine stood<br />
or fell.”<br />
73 “Que si c’estoit d’autres que Juifs, ascauoir quelques enuieux de Sainct Paul;” — “But if there were other than Jews —<br />
some that were envious of St. Paul.”<br />
74 “Estans en quelque necessite;” — “When they are in any emergency.”<br />
75 “Praevaricatores ” The term is employed by classical writers in the sense of betraying the cause of <strong>on</strong>e’s client, <strong>and</strong> by<br />
neglect or collusi<strong>on</strong> assisting his opp<strong>on</strong>ent. See Quinct. 9:2. — Ed.<br />
76 “Si nous nous entend<strong>on</strong>s auec la partie aduerse d’iceluy;” — “If we should c<strong>on</strong>nect ourselves with the party opposed to<br />
him.”<br />
21<br />
John Calvin