Download PDF - Gear Technology magazine
Download PDF - Gear Technology magazine
Download PDF - Gear Technology magazine
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
_-----------O&.A------------<br />
Bedllner 'Charts<br />
and <strong>Gear</strong> Inspection<br />
Q&A is your interactive gear forum.<br />
Send us your gear design, manufactur-<br />
ing, inspection or other fiefated ques-<br />
tions, and we '/I put them before our<br />
panel of experts. Questions may be<br />
mailed to <strong>Gear</strong> <strong>Technology</strong>, P.O. Box<br />
.1426,Elk Grove Village, Ii 60009,USA,<br />
faxed to {847} 43Ni61S or sent e/ectTon-<br />
ically to people@geartechnology.com.<br />
An expanded version of ll&A is also<br />
available at www.geartechnology.com.<br />
Hundreds of questions have already<br />
been posted and answered. Visitors are'<br />
welcome to post their own answers.<br />
Doub!e R,nk Gill· TUllng<br />
/<br />
Smgl. "'.nk G.ar Tonini!<br />
Me-aslJre-s V'iinltionl in e.nter Distance MiUIJ:t1i' Rbtlltu)rllIl Motion.<br />
Fig•.11 - Types lit com,I'0sita gear iinspectioll' ..<br />
u<br />
.. I<br />
IV V)\ .. :V. v<br />
I .. , I 1\<br />
J:<br />
II<br />
I<br />
,..... - T<br />
..,. iii, '\<br />
... J .\. ""<br />
,<br />
J ,<br />
.,u<br />
V 'V<br />
"'" - ..v v<br />
-• , • • . ., • ,. • • .. " ..<br />
Tootl1·Numb ..<br />
IFig.2 -Stri,p thin ,otdoubl. ·Uank compolil.·test.<br />
2.4 GEAR TECHNOLOGY<br />
Robed E. Sm'ith<br />
is the principal in R.E. Smilh &<br />
Co., gear consultants of<br />
Roehester; NY. and one of <strong>Gear</strong><br />
<strong>Technology</strong>'s technical editors.<br />
HI! ha oller 50 years of experitinct!<br />
in gllaring and is Ihl! author<br />
of numerous {JtIpersandanlcles.<br />
He: is also very active in AGMA<br />
standards development.<br />
Question submitted by<br />
Ramiro C. Salinas<br />
Co.rpus Christi Army Depot<br />
Corpus Christi, TX<br />
Q:What are redliner charts.and who<br />
still does redliner charts?<br />
Answer submitted by:<br />
Robert E. Smith<br />
R.E. Smith & Co.<br />
A: For marty years, the terms "red<br />
liner" and "red line charts" have been<br />
used by the Fellows Corporation in rela-<br />
lion to the:ir line of double flallk com-<br />
posite testers, For example, they made<br />
Ille No.4 Fellows Fim~-Pllch Red Liner<br />
and the No. 12RL Red Liner. Double<br />
flank composite gear inspeetion is<br />
shown chematically in Figure I. These<br />
instruments were in such common use<br />
thai. the term "red liner" became synonymous,<br />
w.ith double flank composite<br />
inspection,<br />
The tenn "red line charts" apparently<br />
came from the facl that early recorders<br />
used pens that wrote with red ink. These<br />
were a constant maintenance problem,<br />
diue to dogging and spatter. Later<br />
recorder u ed thermal writing pens and<br />
paper, thermal array printers. or even<br />
printer attached to PC computers.<br />
Double flank composite testers are made<br />
by many different. companies and can use<br />
a variety of writing methods that do not<br />
produce a "red line" on the chart.<br />
To compound the confusion even<br />
more, the 'term "compo ite' inspection<br />
has been taken to mean double flank<br />
composite inspection beeau e it was in<br />
such common use. As can be een in<br />
Figure I, there is another type of composite<br />
inspect jon, called single flank<br />
composite, tilat can be used. Today, both<br />
type appear in gear quality standards<br />
such as AGMA and ISO.<br />
Double and single Hartle composite<br />
testing results in charts such as thai<br />
shown in Figure 2. However, they mean<br />
completely different things, As Figure I<br />
bows, double flank composite test<br />
measure center distance variation as the<br />
gears mil Ihrougb light mesh. Single<br />
flank composite testing, however, mea-<br />
sures rotational motion variation, as the<br />
gears roll thrilugh mesh at standard cen-<br />
ter distance. with backlash.<br />
One can see that the continued use of<br />
the term "red liine chart." is not a very<br />
good idea. The terms "double flank com-<br />
posite chart" or "single flank composite<br />
chart" would be more accurate and prevem<br />
confusion as to what the data mean .<br />
The 0000