Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

selforganizedseminar.files.wordpress.com
from selforganizedseminar.files.wordpress.com More from this publisher
02.07.2013 Views

s p o n t a n e i t y London. For several years, Twyford Down was a war zone and a radical cause célèbre. Ironically, antiroad mobilizations and RTS activism grew in the face of Tory legislation explicitly engineered to stamp it out: the 1994 Criminal Justice Act (CJA), which tried to outlaw any public gathering or street “disorder” involving twenty or more people. In simple terms, anything that didn’t figure on then prime minister John Major’s “democratic” agenda, like genuine free speech and collective protest, could henceforth be rendered illegal. (The CJA still persists in Blair’s Britain.) After its inception, the CJA duly fanned the flames of its “other,” being increasingly imposed on increasing numbers of public gatherings condemning the CJA. RTS/London emerged within this adversarial atmosphere, staging its first “street party” at busy Camden High Street in north London in 1997. The following year, just down the street, it sealed off an even busier artery adjacent to King’s Cross Station: dancers motioned to drumbeats, and hoards of different sorts of people hung out and reclaimed for pedestrians a big stretch of Britain’s capital. By that time, the RTS concept had a distinctive West Coast drawl, touching down in Berkeley, where RTS/Bay Area liberated Telegraph Avenue for a while. Then, responding to Giuliani street cleanup vendettas, RTS/New York came of age in the Big Apple, begetting “great feasts of public space.” Suddenly, protest became imaginative and fun again, veritable be-ins and “carnivals of freaks,” contesting zero tolerance policing, privatization, and sanitization of city life and appealing instead for real human rights, for real public space. Central to RTS’s modus operandi is play and festival, as it is for a lot of the antiglobalization movement. Such prankster politics enacts lampoon, pulls tongues and raises the finger, and voices satire at a rather sober and stern enemy. Turning people on has often meant turning them off party-political smokescreens. They know the revolution will never be televised. Meanwhile, protagonists have recognized a common fate and 57

H e n r i L e F e b v r e common foe as they’ve explored a common opportunity. Lefebvre never saw any of these battles and ransackings, but one wonders what he would have made of them. This time around the hairstyles and fashions of the protesters are different, and they speak in a different tongue and jostle a new-fangled enemy. But they remain Lefebvrian at heart: spontaneous yet smart, politically savvy as well as theoretically astute, Rabelaisian revelers reconstructed. 5

s p o n t a n e i t y<br />

London. For several years, Twyford Down was a war zone and a<br />

radical cause célèbre. Ironically, antiroad mobilizations and RTS<br />

activism grew in the face of Tory legislation explicitly engineered<br />

to stamp it out: the 1994 Criminal Justice Act (CJA), which tried to<br />

outlaw any public gathering or street “disorder” involving twenty<br />

or more people. In simple terms, anything that didn’t figure on<br />

then prime minister John Major’s “democratic” agenda, like genuine<br />

free speech and collective protest, could henceforth be rendered<br />

illegal. (The CJA still persists in Blair’s Britain.) After its<br />

inception, the CJA duly fanned the flames of its “other,” being<br />

increasingly imposed on increasing numbers of public gatherings<br />

condemning the CJA.<br />

RTS/London emerged within this adversarial atmosphere,<br />

staging its first “street party” at busy Camden High Street in north<br />

London in 1997. The following year, just down the street, it sealed<br />

off an even busier artery adjacent to King’s Cross Station: dancers<br />

motioned to drumbeats, and hoards of different sorts of people<br />

hung out and reclaimed for pedestrians a big stretch of Britain’s<br />

capital. By that time, the RTS concept had a distinctive West Coast<br />

drawl, touching down in Berkeley, where RTS/Bay Area liberated<br />

Telegraph Avenue for a while. Then, responding to Giuliani street<br />

cleanup vendettas, RTS/New York came of age in the Big Apple,<br />

begetting “great feasts of public space.” Suddenly, protest became<br />

imaginative and fun again, veritable be-ins and “carnivals of<br />

freaks,” contesting zero tolerance policing, privatization, and sanitization<br />

of city life and appealing instead for real human rights,<br />

for real public space. Central to RTS’s modus operandi is play and<br />

festival, as it is for a lot of the antiglobalization movement.<br />

Such prankster politics enacts lampoon, pulls tongues and<br />

raises the finger, and voices satire at a rather sober and stern enemy.<br />

Turning people on has often meant turning them off party-political<br />

smokescreens. They know the revolution will never be televised.<br />

Meanwhile, protagonists have recognized a common fate and<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!