Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
s p o n t a n e i t y London. For several years, Twyford Down was a war zone and a radical cause célèbre. Ironically, antiroad mobilizations and RTS activism grew in the face of Tory legislation explicitly engineered to stamp it out: the 1994 Criminal Justice Act (CJA), which tried to outlaw any public gathering or street “disorder” involving twenty or more people. In simple terms, anything that didn’t figure on then prime minister John Major’s “democratic” agenda, like genuine free speech and collective protest, could henceforth be rendered illegal. (The CJA still persists in Blair’s Britain.) After its inception, the CJA duly fanned the flames of its “other,” being increasingly imposed on increasing numbers of public gatherings condemning the CJA. RTS/London emerged within this adversarial atmosphere, staging its first “street party” at busy Camden High Street in north London in 1997. The following year, just down the street, it sealed off an even busier artery adjacent to King’s Cross Station: dancers motioned to drumbeats, and hoards of different sorts of people hung out and reclaimed for pedestrians a big stretch of Britain’s capital. By that time, the RTS concept had a distinctive West Coast drawl, touching down in Berkeley, where RTS/Bay Area liberated Telegraph Avenue for a while. Then, responding to Giuliani street cleanup vendettas, RTS/New York came of age in the Big Apple, begetting “great feasts of public space.” Suddenly, protest became imaginative and fun again, veritable be-ins and “carnivals of freaks,” contesting zero tolerance policing, privatization, and sanitization of city life and appealing instead for real human rights, for real public space. Central to RTS’s modus operandi is play and festival, as it is for a lot of the antiglobalization movement. Such prankster politics enacts lampoon, pulls tongues and raises the finger, and voices satire at a rather sober and stern enemy. Turning people on has often meant turning them off party-political smokescreens. They know the revolution will never be televised. Meanwhile, protagonists have recognized a common fate and 57
H e n r i L e F e b v r e common foe as they’ve explored a common opportunity. Lefebvre never saw any of these battles and ransackings, but one wonders what he would have made of them. This time around the hairstyles and fashions of the protesters are different, and they speak in a different tongue and jostle a new-fangled enemy. But they remain Lefebvrian at heart: spontaneous yet smart, politically savvy as well as theoretically astute, Rabelaisian revelers reconstructed. 5
- Page 42 and 43: e v e r y d a y L i F e familiar is
- Page 44 and 45: e v e r y d a y L i F e This is the
- Page 46 and 47: e v e r y d a y L i F e idealized v
- Page 48 and 49: e v e r y d a y L i F e of mechanic
- Page 50 and 51: e v e r y d a y L i F e everyday li
- Page 52 and 53: e v e r y d a y L i F e wrote “ea
- Page 54: e v e r y d a y L i F e my green ca
- Page 57 and 58: H e n r i L e F e b v r e “turbo-
- Page 59 and 60: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the poten
- Page 61 and 62: H e n r i L e F e b v r e possibili
- Page 63 and 64: H e n r i L e F e b v r e contempt,
- Page 65 and 66: H e n r i L e F e b v r e or collap
- Page 67 and 68: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the Frenc
- Page 69 and 70: H e n r i L e F e b v r e periphera
- Page 71 and 72: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Lefebvre
- Page 73 and 74: H e n r i L e F e b v r e feelings
- Page 75 and 76: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Lefebvre
- Page 77 and 78: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the Hotel
- Page 79 and 80: H e n r i L e F e b v r e found the
- Page 81 and 82: H e n r i L e F e b v r e thought i
- Page 83 and 84: H e n r i L e F e b v r e examinati
- Page 85 and 86: H e n r i L e F e b v r e with cohe
- Page 87 and 88: H e n r i L e F e b v r e in Quebec
- Page 89 and 90: H e n r i L e F e b v r e “the sc
- Page 91: H e n r i L e F e b v r e into a si
- Page 95 and 96: H e n r i L e F e b v r e alienatio
- Page 97 and 98: H e n r i L e F e b v r e history,
- Page 99 and 100: H e n r i L e F e b v r e of a thou
- Page 101 and 102: H e n r i L e F e b v r e self-cons
- Page 103 and 104: H e n r i L e F e b v r e To some e
- Page 105 and 106: H e n r i L e F e b v r e nearby, c
- Page 107 and 108: H e n r i L e F e b v r e wherewith
- Page 109 and 110: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Estrada C
- Page 111 and 112: H e n r i L e F e b v r e twenty-th
- Page 114 and 115: 5 Urban Revolution It is in the cou
- Page 116 and 117: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n revol
- Page 118 and 119: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n real
- Page 120 and 121: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n natur
- Page 122 and 123: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n of ur
- Page 124 and 125: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n globa
- Page 126 and 127: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n the d
- Page 128 and 129: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n the s
- Page 130 and 131: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n exces
- Page 132: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n deep
- Page 135 and 136: H e n r i L e F e b v r e illustrio
- Page 137 and 138: H e n r i L e F e b v r e intellect
- Page 139 and 140: H e n r i L e F e b v r e denigrate
- Page 141 and 142: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Here we h
s p o n t a n e i t y<br />
London. For several years, Twyford Down was a war zone and a<br />
radical cause célèbre. Ironically, antiroad mobilizations and RTS<br />
activism grew in the face of Tory legislation explicitly engineered<br />
to stamp it out: the 1994 Criminal Justice Act (CJA), which tried to<br />
outlaw any public gathering or street “disorder” involving twenty<br />
or more people. In simple terms, anything that didn’t figure on<br />
then prime minister John Major’s “democratic” agenda, like genuine<br />
free speech and collective protest, could henceforth be rendered<br />
illegal. (The CJA still persists in Blair’s Britain.) After its<br />
inception, the CJA duly fanned the flames of its “other,” being<br />
increasingly imposed on increasing numbers of public gatherings<br />
condemning the CJA.<br />
RTS/London emerged within this adversarial atmosphere,<br />
staging its first “street party” at busy Camden High Street in north<br />
London in 1997. The following year, just down the street, it sealed<br />
off an even busier artery adjacent to King’s Cross Station: dancers<br />
motioned to drumbeats, and hoards of different sorts of people<br />
hung out and reclaimed for pedestrians a big stretch of Britain’s<br />
capital. By that time, the RTS concept had a distinctive West Coast<br />
drawl, touching down in Berkeley, where RTS/Bay Area liberated<br />
Telegraph Avenue for a while. Then, responding to Giuliani street<br />
cleanup vendettas, RTS/New York came of age in the Big Apple,<br />
begetting “great feasts of public space.” Suddenly, protest became<br />
imaginative and fun again, veritable be-ins and “carnivals of<br />
freaks,” contesting zero tolerance policing, privatization, and sanitization<br />
of city life and appealing instead for real human rights,<br />
for real public space. Central to RTS’s modus operandi is play and<br />
festival, as it is for a lot of the antiglobalization movement.<br />
Such prankster politics enacts lampoon, pulls tongues and<br />
raises the finger, and voices satire at a rather sober and stern enemy.<br />
Turning people on has often meant turning them off party-political<br />
smokescreens. They know the revolution will never be televised.<br />
Meanwhile, protagonists have recognized a common fate and<br />
57