Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
2 Moments A roll of the dice will never abolish chance. —Stéphane Mallarmé, Un coup de dés jamais n’abolira le hasard Henri Lefebvre started the tumultuous decade of the 1960s laughing as a new man, if not quite a total man. He celebrated his sixtieth birthday with a new job (chair of sociology at the University of Strasbourg), a couple of new books (Critique of Everyday Life—Volume 2 and Introduction to Modernity), and some new militant friends, younger friends—like Guy Debord and the Situationists—who’d ignite each other in the explosion of 1968. (By that point, Lefebvre was teaching at suburban Paris- Nanterre, where the initial spark of student discontent had been generated.) In 1961, he also inaugurated himself with a new status: 21
H e n r i L e F e b v r e “turbo-Prof,” a species of French academic who teaches in the provinces, who catches the train à grande vitesse (TGV) every Monday morning and Thursday afternoon, yet keeps a primary residence in the nation’s capital. (Lefebvre lived at rue Rambuteau in the 3rd arrondissement, first in an apartment at number 24, and later at number 30. Both buildings were close to the old Les Halles market halls, architectural jewels destined to be demolished in 1969 to make way for the RER rapid computer train line—which would ironically speed to Nanterre. In 1977, the dreaded Pompidou Centre became Lefebvre’s unwelcome, upscale neighbor. He could almost spit at it from his front window.) 1 “Around 1960,” Lefebvre reflects in Everyday Life in the Modern World (1968), “the situation became clearer.” Everyday life was “no longer the no-man’s land, the poor relation of specialized activities. In France and elsewhere, neo-capitalist leaders had become aware of the fact that colonies were more trouble than they were worth and there was a change of strategy; new vistas opened out such as investments in national territories and the organization of home trade.” 2 The net result, Lefebvre thinks, was that “all areas outside the centers of political decision making and economic concentration of capital were considered as semi-colonies and exploited as such; these included the suburbs of cities, the countryside, zones of agricultural production and all outlying districts inhabited, needless to say, by employees, technicians and manual laborers; thus the state of the proletarian became generalized, leading to a blurring of class distinctions and ideological ‘values.’ ” 3 Work life, private life, and leisure were “rationally” exploited, cut up, laid out, and put back together again, timetabled and monitored by the assorted bureaucracies, corporations, and technocracies. Massive scientific and technological revolutions became a perverse inversion of—and substitute for—the social and political revolution that never materialized. That was like waiting for Godot. (“We’ll hang ourselves tomorrow. [Pause.] Unless Godot 22
- Page 5 and 6: Published in 2006 by Routledge Tayl
- Page 7 and 8: Over the future, everybody deludes
- Page 9 and 10: 7 Globalization and the State 121 8
- Page 11 and 12: F o r e w o r d Manhattan, meanwhil
- Page 13 and 14: F o r e w o r d He dramatizes this
- Page 15 and 16: F o r e w o r d couples staggering
- Page 18: Acknowledgments I’d like to thank
- Page 21 and 22: p r e F a c e rumpled brown tweed j
- Page 23 and 24: p r e F a c e always inquisitive, h
- Page 25 and 26: p r e F a c e * * * Lefebvre may ha
- Page 27 and 28: p r e F a c e if, in fact, he was r
- Page 29 and 30: p r e F a c e culture and tradition
- Page 31 and 32: p r e F a c e collaborator Norbert
- Page 33 and 34: p r e F a c e his frank concern for
- Page 36 and 37: 1 Everyday Life One finds all one w
- Page 38 and 39: e v e r y d a y L i F e warmth, bri
- Page 40 and 41: e v e r y d a y L i F e Marxist dia
- Page 42 and 43: e v e r y d a y L i F e familiar is
- Page 44 and 45: e v e r y d a y L i F e This is the
- Page 46 and 47: e v e r y d a y L i F e idealized v
- Page 48 and 49: e v e r y d a y L i F e of mechanic
- Page 50 and 51: e v e r y d a y L i F e everyday li
- Page 52 and 53: e v e r y d a y L i F e wrote “ea
- Page 54: e v e r y d a y L i F e my green ca
- Page 59 and 60: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the poten
- Page 61 and 62: H e n r i L e F e b v r e possibili
- Page 63 and 64: H e n r i L e F e b v r e contempt,
- Page 65 and 66: H e n r i L e F e b v r e or collap
- Page 67 and 68: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the Frenc
- Page 69 and 70: H e n r i L e F e b v r e periphera
- Page 71 and 72: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Lefebvre
- Page 73 and 74: H e n r i L e F e b v r e feelings
- Page 75 and 76: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Lefebvre
- Page 77 and 78: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the Hotel
- Page 79 and 80: H e n r i L e F e b v r e found the
- Page 81 and 82: H e n r i L e F e b v r e thought i
- Page 83 and 84: H e n r i L e F e b v r e examinati
- Page 85 and 86: H e n r i L e F e b v r e with cohe
- Page 87 and 88: H e n r i L e F e b v r e in Quebec
- Page 89 and 90: H e n r i L e F e b v r e “the sc
- Page 91 and 92: H e n r i L e F e b v r e into a si
- Page 93 and 94: H e n r i L e F e b v r e common fo
- Page 95 and 96: H e n r i L e F e b v r e alienatio
- Page 97 and 98: H e n r i L e F e b v r e history,
- Page 99 and 100: H e n r i L e F e b v r e of a thou
- Page 101 and 102: H e n r i L e F e b v r e self-cons
- Page 103 and 104: H e n r i L e F e b v r e To some e
H e n r i L e F e b v r e<br />
“turbo-Prof,” a species of French academic who teaches in the<br />
provinces, who catches the train à grande vitesse (TGV) every<br />
Monday morning and Thursday afternoon, yet keeps a primary<br />
residence in the nation’s capital. (<strong>Lefebvre</strong> lived at rue Rambuteau<br />
in the 3rd arrondissement, first in an apartment at number 24, and<br />
later at number 30. Both buildings were close to the old Les Halles<br />
market halls, architectural jewels destined to be demolished in<br />
1969 to make way for the RER rapid computer train line—which<br />
would ironically speed to Nanterre. In 1977, the dreaded Pompidou<br />
Centre became <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s unwelcome, upscale neighbor. He could<br />
almost spit at it from his front window.) 1<br />
“Around 1960,” <strong>Lefebvre</strong> reflects in Everyday Life in the<br />
Modern World (1968), “the situation became clearer.” Everyday<br />
life was “no longer the no-man’s land, the poor relation of specialized<br />
activities. In France and elsewhere, neo-capitalist leaders had<br />
become aware of the fact that colonies were more trouble than they<br />
were worth and there was a change of strategy; new vistas opened<br />
out such as investments in national territories and the organization<br />
of home trade.” 2 The net result, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> thinks, was that “all areas<br />
outside the centers of political decision making and economic concentration<br />
of capital were considered as semi-colonies and exploited<br />
as such; these included the suburbs of cities, the countryside, zones<br />
of agricultural production and all outlying districts inhabited,<br />
needless to say, by employees, technicians and manual laborers;<br />
thus the state of the proletarian became generalized, leading to a<br />
blurring of class distinctions and ideological ‘values.’ ” 3 Work life,<br />
private life, and leisure were “rationally” exploited, cut up, laid<br />
out, and put back together again, timetabled and monitored by the<br />
assorted bureaucracies, corporations, and technocracies.<br />
Massive scientific and technological revolutions became a<br />
perverse inversion of—and substitute for—the social and political<br />
revolution that never materialized. That was like waiting for<br />
Godot. (“We’ll hang ourselves tomorrow. [Pause.] Unless Godot<br />
22