Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
e v e r y d a y L i F e my green candle, let’s go to war, since you’re so keen on it!”) But on festival day, all masks were dropped, all ideology exposed, all pretence pilloried. On festival day, another more immediate truth was heard, in frank and simple terms, amidst the laughter and the foolishness—because of the impropriety and parody. People literally drank and laughed away their fears. Laughter opened up people’s eyes, posited the world anew in its most naive and soberest aspects. In 1955, Lefebvre warned how we’d lost Rabelais’s laughter. And in losing it, he said, we’ve lost a big part of our cultural heritage, even lost a weapon in our revolutionary arsenal. Lefebvre’s study of Rabelais, by embracing festival, laughter, and the medieval sage as educator, evokes another instance of his “regressive–progressive” method: going backward, he suggests, helps us go forward and onward. For Lefebvre, the laugh of Rabelais bawled the song of innocence, not a song of deception, “a naïve life that sets its own laws upon solid principles, without struggling against itself nor without having to repress. … It’s thus that the living humanism of Rabelais can serve the socialist humanist cause: by laughing.” 37 19
- Page 5 and 6: Published in 2006 by Routledge Tayl
- Page 7 and 8: Over the future, everybody deludes
- Page 9 and 10: 7 Globalization and the State 121 8
- Page 11 and 12: F o r e w o r d Manhattan, meanwhil
- Page 13 and 14: F o r e w o r d He dramatizes this
- Page 15 and 16: F o r e w o r d couples staggering
- Page 18: Acknowledgments I’d like to thank
- Page 21 and 22: p r e F a c e rumpled brown tweed j
- Page 23 and 24: p r e F a c e always inquisitive, h
- Page 25 and 26: p r e F a c e * * * Lefebvre may ha
- Page 27 and 28: p r e F a c e if, in fact, he was r
- Page 29 and 30: p r e F a c e culture and tradition
- Page 31 and 32: p r e F a c e collaborator Norbert
- Page 33 and 34: p r e F a c e his frank concern for
- Page 36 and 37: 1 Everyday Life One finds all one w
- Page 38 and 39: e v e r y d a y L i F e warmth, bri
- Page 40 and 41: e v e r y d a y L i F e Marxist dia
- Page 42 and 43: e v e r y d a y L i F e familiar is
- Page 44 and 45: e v e r y d a y L i F e This is the
- Page 46 and 47: e v e r y d a y L i F e idealized v
- Page 48 and 49: e v e r y d a y L i F e of mechanic
- Page 50 and 51: e v e r y d a y L i F e everyday li
- Page 52 and 53: e v e r y d a y L i F e wrote “ea
- Page 56 and 57: 2 Moments A roll of the dice will n
- Page 58 and 59: M o M e n t s comes. / And if he co
- Page 60 and 61: M o M e n t s who now slavishly fol
- Page 62 and 63: M o M e n t s Somme et le Reste.
- Page 64 and 65: M o M e n t s emphasis), “appeare
- Page 66 and 67: M o M e n t s sought to abolish phi
- Page 68 and 69: M o M e n t s During Lefebvre and D
- Page 70 and 71: M o M e n t s A week on (February 2
- Page 72 and 73: M o M e n t s thesis follows a deli
- Page 74 and 75: 3 Spontaneity Bestir yourself!—Ah
- Page 76 and 77: s p o n t a n e i t y Molotov cockt
- Page 78 and 79: s p o n t a n e i t y various free
- Page 80 and 81: s p o n t a n e i t y itself ‘pur
- Page 82 and 83: s p o n t a n e i t y Marx never re
- Page 84 and 85: s p o n t a n e i t y from the outs
- Page 86 and 87: s p o n t a n e i t y bounds. To at
- Page 88 and 89: s p o n t a n e i t y in senseless
- Page 90 and 91: s p o n t a n e i t y “Spectacula
- Page 92 and 93: s p o n t a n e i t y London. For s
- Page 94 and 95: 4 Urbanity The antagonism between t
- Page 96 and 97: U r b a n i t y Still, every time h
- Page 98 and 99: U r b a n i t y whole town seems
- Page 100 and 101: U r b a n i t y “the expiring sea
- Page 102 and 103: U r b a n i t y Is the city a techn
e v e r y d a y L i F e<br />
my green candle, let’s go to war, since you’re so keen on it!”) But<br />
on festival day, all masks were dropped, all ideology exposed, all<br />
pretence pilloried. On festival day, another more immediate truth<br />
was heard, in frank and simple terms, amidst the laughter and<br />
the foolishness—because of the impropriety and parody. People<br />
literally drank and laughed away their fears. Laughter opened up<br />
people’s eyes, posited the world anew in its most naive and soberest<br />
aspects.<br />
In 1955, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> warned how we’d lost Rabelais’s laughter.<br />
And in losing it, he said, we’ve lost a big part of our cultural heritage,<br />
even lost a weapon in our revolutionary arsenal. <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s<br />
study of Rabelais, by embracing festival, laughter, and the medieval<br />
sage as educator, evokes another instance of his “regressive–progressive”<br />
method: going backward, he suggests, helps us go forward<br />
and onward. For <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, the laugh of Rabelais bawled the<br />
song of innocence, not a song of deception, “a naïve life that sets<br />
its own laws upon solid principles, without struggling against itself<br />
nor without having to repress. … It’s thus that the living humanism<br />
of Rabelais can serve the socialist humanist cause: by laughing.” 37<br />
19