02.07.2013 Views

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

p r e F a c e<br />

always inquisitive, he continued to travel far and wide, making<br />

prescient analyses on the changing nature of the state and the role<br />

of space in the “survival of capitalism.” As an oeuvre, <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s<br />

fascinating breadth and imaginative reach are perhaps unmatched.<br />

Manuel Castells, a former assistant of <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s at Nanterre in the<br />

late 1960s, once remarked that <strong>Lefebvre</strong> “doesn’t know anything<br />

about how the economy works, how technology works … but he<br />

had a genius for intuiting what really was happening. Almost like<br />

an artist … he was probably the greatest philosopher on cities we<br />

have had.” 6<br />

<strong>Lefebvre</strong> blasted out his books “jerkily, hastily, nervously.” 7<br />

This modus operandi is the story of his whole literary life; it was<br />

a habit he’d never relinquish, whether in war or peace. He wrote<br />

every book as if it was his last: feverously, rapidly—perhaps, on<br />

occasion, too rapidly. Many, in fact, were dictated, the spoken<br />

word transcribed on the page by faithful secretaries, current girlfriends,<br />

or a latest wife. Arguably, he undertook too much during<br />

his long career, conceiving brilliant, original projects yet rarely<br />

completing any of them, leaving them instead gaping, incomplete,<br />

suggestive, as he flitted on to something else. “I loved too much,”<br />

he admitted in his autobiography La Somme et le Reste (Tome I,<br />

p. 48), “the bubbling and the fermenting of an idea that burst out<br />

new and fresh.” On the other hand, this is what made his work so<br />

experimental, so approachable; you can enter it and write your own<br />

chapter within it. <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s method followed Jean-Paul Sartre’s<br />

ideal method: “It is the nature of an intellectual quest,” Sartre said<br />

in Search for a Method, “to be undefined. To name it and to define<br />

it is to wrap it up and tie the knot.” 8<br />

La Somme et le Reste is one of the most original works of<br />

Marxist philosophy ever and, to my mind, <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s greatest<br />

book. Written between 1957 and 1958 while <strong>Lefebvre</strong> worked in<br />

Paris at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS),<br />

the two-volume, eight-hundred-leave tome was manically drafted<br />

xxii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!