Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
n o t e s 33. Debord, “Réponse à une Enquête du Groupe Surréaliste Belge,” in Guy Debord Présente “Potlatch” (1954–1957) (Gallimard, Paris, 1996), p. 42. 34. Debord, Guy Debord Correspondance, Volume 1: juin 1957–août 1960 (Librairie Arthème Fayard, Paris, 1999), p. 313. 35. Ibid., p. 318. 36. Ibid., p. 318. Emphasis in original. 37. Stendhal, Racine and Shakespeare, cited in Henri Lefebvre, Introduction to Modernity (Verso, London, 1995), p. 239. Stendhal (1783–1842) was the penname of Henri Beyle, whose romantic novels, especially Scarlet and Black (1830) and The Charterhouse of Parma (1839), brought him fame and a following. Stendhal dedicated his works to “the happy few” and coined the term Beylism as his philosophical credo for the pursuit of happiness. His dedication may have been an allusion to Shakespeare’s Henry V: “We few, we happy few, we band of brothers.” Interestingly, and unbeknownst to the Lefebvre of Introduction to Modernity, Shakespeare’s phrase would feature in Guy Debord’s film version of The Society of the Spectacle (1973). Following the caption of “we happy few,” the frame flashes to wall graffiti at an occupied Sorbonne, circa late 1960s: “Run quickly, comrade, the old world is behind you!” 38. Lefebvre, Introduction to Modernity, p. 239. 39. Ibid., p. 346. Emphasis in original. 40. Ibid., p. 359. For his own part, Debord responded graciously to Lefebvre in a letter dated May 5, 1960. “I am counting on the perspectives of the Situationists,” the Situ leader told Lefebvre, “(which, as you know, don’t fear going far out) for at least reconciling romanticism with our revolutionary side; and better, for eventually overcoming all romanticism.” See Guy Debord Correspondance, Volume 1, p. 332. 41. Introduction to Modernity, p. 258. 42. Ibid., p. 302. Chapter 3 1. Interview with author, March 15, 2005. Today, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, the ex- ’68 student leader, is copresident of Greens/Free European Alliance in the European Parliament. He’s also a frequent (and outspoken) political commentator on French TV with left-democratic, pro-European integrationist ideals. 2. Introduction to Modernity, p. 343. 3. Lefebvre, The Explosion: Marxism and the French Upheaval (Monthly Review Press, New York, 1969), p. 7. All page citations to follow refer to this edition. 4. Lefebvre himself began to document changes (and contradictions) between “politics” and “the economy” from the mid-1970s onward in a series of volumes on the state. The title alone of one of them captured the nub of the shift away from a managerialist style of national government to a 177
n o t e s entrepreneurial, often supranational, one: Le mode de production étatique (1977)—the statist mode of production. 5. Vladimir Lenin, One Step Forward, Two Steps Back (The Crisis in Our Party) (Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1978). 6. Rosa Luxemburg, The Russian Revolution, and Lenin or Marxism? (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1961). 7. One of the great countercultural texts of Lefebvre’s generation, urging the same exuberance to Rabelaisian audiences across the ocean, was Norman O. Brown’s Life against Death (Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, Connecticut, 1959): “It was Blake who said that the road to excess leads to the palace of wisdom; Hegel was able to see the dialectic of reality as ‘the bacchanalian revel, in which no member is not drunk.’ … The only alternative to the witches’ brew is psychoanalytical consciousness, which is not the Apollonian scholasticism, but consciousness embracing and affirming instinctual reality—Dionysian consciousness” (p. 176). 8. The Survival of Capitalism, p. 100. “There must be an objective,” Lefebvre says, “a strategy: nothing can replace political thought, or a cultivated spontaneity.” Curiously, when Lefebvre published La survie du capitalisme in 1973, he included several essays that had already figured in The Explosion [L’irruption de Nanterre au sommet], including “Contestation, Spontaneity, Violence.” Alas, the English version removed these repetitions, denying Anglophone scholars the chance to muse on why the doubling up. The subtitle of Survival offers clues: “reproduction of relations of production.” Five years on from ’68, the capitalist system had not only withstood “subjective” bombardment but also “objectively” began to grow. The essential condition of this growth is that relations of production can be reproduced. How are they reproduced? In a wink to Althusser, Lefebvre’s text is less exuberant in its revolutionary hopes and enters into the world of institutional analyses; yet it’s obvious he can’t quite resist toying with the idea of spontaneity and contestation throwing a spanner in the apparatus of societal reproduction. See, for more details, Remi Hess’s enlightening “Postface” to the third edition of La survie du capitalisme (Anthropos, Paris, 2002), pp. 197–214. 9. See Anthony Giddens, The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy (Polity, London, 1998). Chapter 4 1. In Pyrénées, Lefebvre calls Mourenx a “semi-colony,” built between 1957 and 1960 for gas workers at the plant in nearby Lacq. Of Lacq, Lefebvre notes (p. 116), “The ‘complex,’ according to the pompous and imprecise vocabulary of the technocrats, encrusts itself in the landscape like a foreign body.” “Who had profited?” from this alien intrusion. “Before all Paris, before all private enterprise, who receive from here energy and natural resources, and who’ve participated in the trappings of mobilizing the gigantic means of state capitalism” (p. 117). 17
- Page 161 and 162: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the blank
- Page 163 and 164: H e n r i L e F e b v r e better,
- Page 165 and 166: H e n r i L e F e b v r e against a
- Page 167 and 168: H e n r i L e F e b v r e a crucial
- Page 169 and 170: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Davos, Sw
- Page 171 and 172: H e n r i L e F e b v r e exploitat
- Page 173 and 174: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the mold
- Page 175 and 176: H e n r i L e F e b v r e followed
- Page 177 and 178: H e n r i L e F e b v r e excited b
- Page 179 and 180: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Coming ho
- Page 181 and 182: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the age o
- Page 183 and 184: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the Unhap
- Page 185 and 186: H e n r i L e F e b v r e people’
- Page 187 and 188: H e n r i L e F e b v r e conscious
- Page 189 and 190: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Modern ma
- Page 191 and 192: H e n r i L e F e b v r e idea. The
- Page 193 and 194: H e n r i L e F e b v r e and Nietz
- Page 195 and 196: H e n r i L e F e b v r e overcome
- Page 197 and 198: H e n r i L e F e b v r e knows not
- Page 199 and 200: H e n r i L e F e b v r e bad rap w
- Page 201 and 202: H e n r i L e F e b v r e claimed t
- Page 203 and 204: H e n r i L e F e b v r e The shift
- Page 205 and 206: H e n r i L e F e b v r e and revel
- Page 207 and 208: n o t e s 6. Manuel Castells, “Ci
- Page 209 and 210: n o t e s 20. Critique of Everyday
- Page 211: n o t e s 15. Stéphane Mallarmé,
- Page 215 and 216: n o t e s borrow their themes from
- Page 217 and 218: n o t e s Capitalism,” Geografisk
- Page 219 and 220: n o t e s 6. Manuel Castells, The U
- Page 221 and 222: n o t e s 17. Lefebvre, Autogestion
- Page 223 and 224: n o t e s place to place and make i
- Page 226 and 227: A Adorno, Theodor, 175n10 Allen, Wo
- Page 228 and 229: L Lassalle, Ferdinand, 128 Lautréa
- Page 230 and 231: Monopoly capitalism, 9-10, 11, 22,
- Page 232 and 233: “The Head of Don Quixote”: Henr
- Page 234 and 235: Brueghel, Pieter the Elder, Fight B
- Page 236 and 237: The Pompidou Center: from Lefebvre
- Page 238: Lefebvre to Guterman, October 18, 1
n o t e s<br />
33. Debord, “Réponse à une Enquête du Groupe Surréaliste Belge,” in Guy<br />
Debord Présente “Potlatch” (1954–1957) (Gallimard, Paris, 1996), p. 42.<br />
34. Debord, Guy Debord Correspondance, Volume 1: juin 1957–août 1960<br />
(Librairie Arthème Fayard, Paris, 1999), p. 313.<br />
35. Ibid., p. 318.<br />
36. Ibid., p. 318. Emphasis in original.<br />
37. Stendhal, Racine and Shakespeare, cited in <strong>Henri</strong> <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, <strong>Introduction</strong><br />
to Modernity (Verso, London, 1995), p. 239. Stendhal (1783–1842) was the<br />
penname of <strong>Henri</strong> Beyle, whose romantic novels, especially Scarlet and<br />
Black (1830) and The Charterhouse of Parma (1839), brought him fame and<br />
a following. Stendhal dedicated his works to “the happy few” and coined<br />
the term Beylism as his philosophical credo for the pursuit of happiness.<br />
His dedication may have been an allusion to Shakespeare’s Henry V: “We<br />
few, we happy few, we band of brothers.” Interestingly, and unbeknownst<br />
to the <strong>Lefebvre</strong> of <strong>Introduction</strong> to Modernity, Shakespeare’s phrase would<br />
feature in Guy Debord’s film version of The Society of the Spectacle (1973).<br />
Following the caption of “we happy few,” the frame flashes to wall graffiti<br />
at an occupied Sorbonne, circa late 1960s: “Run quickly, comrade, the old<br />
world is behind you!”<br />
38. <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, <strong>Introduction</strong> to Modernity, p. 239.<br />
39. Ibid., p. 346. Emphasis in original.<br />
40. Ibid., p. 359. For his own part, Debord responded graciously to <strong>Lefebvre</strong><br />
in a letter dated May 5, 1960. “I am counting on the perspectives of the<br />
Situationists,” the Situ leader told <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, “(which, as you know, don’t<br />
fear going far out) for at least reconciling romanticism with our revolutionary<br />
side; and better, for eventually overcoming all romanticism.” See Guy<br />
Debord Correspondance, Volume 1, p. 332.<br />
41. <strong>Introduction</strong> to Modernity, p. 258.<br />
42. Ibid., p. 302.<br />
Chapter 3<br />
1. Interview with author, March 15, 2005. Today, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, the ex-<br />
’68 student leader, is copresident of Greens/Free European Alliance in the<br />
European Parliament. He’s also a frequent (and outspoken) political commentator<br />
on French TV with left-democratic, pro-European integrationist<br />
ideals.<br />
2. <strong>Introduction</strong> to Modernity, p. 343.<br />
3. <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, The Explosion: Marxism and the French Upheaval (Monthly<br />
Review Press, New York, 1969), p. 7. All page citations to follow refer to<br />
this edition.<br />
4. <strong>Lefebvre</strong> himself began to document changes (and contradictions) between<br />
“politics” and “the economy” from the mid-1970s onward in a series of<br />
volumes on the state. The title alone of one of them captured the nub of<br />
the shift away from a managerialist style of national government to a<br />
177