Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

selforganizedseminar.files.wordpress.com
from selforganizedseminar.files.wordpress.com More from this publisher
02.07.2013 Views

n o t e s 4. “An Interview with Henri Lefebvre,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space no. 5 (1987): 27–38. 5. Lefebvre, Critique of Everyday Life—Volume 2 (Verso, London, 2002), p. 3. 6. Ibid., p. 41. 7. Ibid., p. 89. 8. See David Riesman, Nathan Glazer, and Reuel Denney, The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character (Doubleday Books, New York, 1953). 9. William H. Whyte, The Organization Man (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1956). 10. Herbert Marcuse, One Dimensional Man: The Ideology of Industrial Society (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1964). Alongside Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno, Marcuse was one of the pioneers of the celebrated “Frankfurt School of Social Research,” a left-wing think tank that worked on critical theory, aesthetics, and politics. In attempting to figure out modern industrial and technological society, new state forms, and ideological manipulation, they brought Marx, Hegel, and Freud into an imaginative dialogue. In the 1930s, the School, dominated by Jews, was forced to quit Germany; Marcuse bivouacked for years in the United States and taught philosophy at the University of California, San Diego. 11. Conversation avec Henri Lefebvre, p. 70. 12. Lefebvre, The Explosion: Marxism and the French Upheaval (Monthly Review Press, New York, 1969), p. 31; emphasis in original. Marshall Berman, at the sprite age of twenty-three, voiced a similar critique of Marcuse’s “closed, fatalistic perspective” in 1964. “Marcuse has become more concrete with advancing age, more involved than ever in the sociopathology of everyday life. … [He] tries to explain advanced industrial society as a smoothly functioning system in which every aspect of life reinforces the others, an infernal machine in which all parts mesh to grind the spirit down. … He is not accustomed to [society’s] dark and twisted ways”; Marshall Berman, “Theory and Practice,” Partisan Review (Fall 1964): 619. 13. The butterfly figures as a powerful romantic metaphor in La Somme et le Reste (see, especially, Tome II, p. 428), even as a symbol of Lefebvre’s anarchist tendencies. One incident in particular is recalled, from Lefebvre’s military service in 1926. Out on an infantry exercise one early summer morning, “I glimpsed ten steps ahead of me, at the side of the lane, a lovely butterfly whose rose wings where damp; this prevented him from flying. I hastened myself, took him as delicately as possible and placed him down on the embankment.” Three seconds later, a corporal sticks a rifle butt in Lefebvre’s back. The captain on horseback shouts, “Chasseur Lefebvre! 8 days in police detention.” “This lad announces himself as a dangerous subversive element … a soft dreamer, a saviour of butterflies … an intellectual anarchist.” 14. Critique of Everyday Life—Volume II, p. 348 (emphasis in original). 175

n o t e s 15. Stéphane Mallarmé, preface to “A Roll of the Dice Will Never Abolish Chance” (1895), in Stéphane Mallarmé—Selected Poetry and Prose, ed. Mary Ann Caws (New Directions Books, New York, 1982), p. 105. Mallarmé’s poem sprawls diagonally across the page, with certain verses interspersed with others; odd words dwell alone just as others interlock and interweave. Sometimes, you don’t know whether the verses flow over the page or down the page or in both directions simultaneously. 16. Henri Bergson, Creative Evolution (Modern Library, New York, 1944), p. 337. 17. Ibid., p. 393. 18. La Somme et le Reste—Tome I, p. 234. 19. Ibid., p. 235. 20. Critique of Everyday Life—Volume 2, p. 347. 21. La Somme et le Reste—Tome II, p. 647. 22. Critique of Everyday Life—Volume 2, p. 345. 23. Ibid., p. 351. 24. For more details on Debord’s (1931–94) stormy life and complex thought, see my Guy Debord (Reaktion Books, London, 2005). On the brink of insurgency, Debord published The Society of the Spectacle (1967), his bestknown text, a work that would become the radical book of the decade, perhaps even the most radical radical book ever written. Utterly original in composition, its 221 strange, pointed aphorisms blend a youthful Marx with a left-wing Hegel, a bellicose Machiavelli with a utopian Karl Korsch, a militaristic Clausewitz with a romantic Georg Lukács. Debord reinvented Marxian political economy as elegant prose poetry, and with its stirring refrains, The Society of the Spectacle indicted an emergent world order in which unity really spelled division, essence appearance, truth falsity. 25. “Lefebvre on the Situationist International,” October (Winter 1997): 69–70. 26. Lefebvre, Le Temps des Méprises [Times of Contempt] (Éditions Stock, Paris, 1975), p. 158. 27. Ibid., p. 151. 28. “Lefebvre on the Situationist International,” p. 70. 29. Cited in Christophe Bourseiller’s Vie et mort de Guy Debord (Plon, Paris, 1999), pp. 258–59. Nicole gave birth to Lefebvre’s sixth child, daughter Armelle, in 1964. In 1978, at the age of seventy-seven, Lefebvre married Catherine Regulier, then a twenty-one-year-old communist militant. Estranged from her parents because of her relationship with Lefebvre, Catherine and Henri stayed together until the end of his life. 30. Guy Debord, “In Girum Imus Nocte et Consumimur Igni,” in Guy Debord— Oeuvres Cinématographiques Complètes, 1952–1978 (Gallimard, Paris, 1978), p. 253. Debord’s threnody to Paris, and his denunciation of the established film world, has a Latin palindrome title with an English translation: “We go round and around and are consumed by fire.” 31. “Lefebvre and the Situationist International.” 32. See Andy Merrifield, Guy Debord, especially chap. 1. 176

n o t e s<br />

4. “An Interview with <strong>Henri</strong> <strong>Lefebvre</strong>,” Environment and Planning D: Society<br />

and Space no. 5 (1987): 27–38.<br />

5. <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, Critique of Everyday Life—Volume 2 (Verso, London, 2002),<br />

p. 3.<br />

6. Ibid., p. 41.<br />

7. Ibid., p. 89.<br />

8. See David Riesman, Nathan Glazer, and Reuel Denney, The Lonely Crowd:<br />

A Study of the Changing American Character (Doubleday Books, New<br />

York, 1953).<br />

9. William H. Whyte, The Organization Man (Simon and Schuster, New<br />

York, 1956).<br />

10. Herbert Marcuse, One Dimensional Man: The Ideology of Industrial<br />

Society (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1964). Alongside Max<br />

Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno, Marcuse was one of the pioneers of the<br />

celebrated “Frankfurt School of Social Research,” a left-wing think tank<br />

that worked on critical theory, aesthetics, and politics. In attempting to<br />

figure out modern industrial and technological society, new state forms,<br />

and ideological manipulation, they brought Marx, Hegel, and Freud into<br />

an imaginative dialogue. In the 1930s, the School, dominated by Jews, was<br />

forced to quit Germany; Marcuse bivouacked for years in the United States<br />

and taught philosophy at the University of California, San Diego.<br />

11. Conversation avec <strong>Henri</strong> <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, p. 70.<br />

12. <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, The Explosion: Marxism and the French Upheaval (Monthly<br />

Review Press, New York, 1969), p. 31; emphasis in original. Marshall<br />

Berman, at the sprite age of twenty-three, voiced a similar critique of<br />

Marcuse’s “closed, fatalistic perspective” in 1964. “Marcuse has become<br />

more concrete with advancing age, more involved than ever in the sociopathology<br />

of everyday life. … [He] tries to explain advanced industrial<br />

society as a smoothly functioning system in which every aspect of life reinforces<br />

the others, an infernal machine in which all parts mesh to grind the<br />

spirit down. … He is not accustomed to [society’s] dark and twisted ways”;<br />

Marshall Berman, “Theory and Practice,” Partisan Review (Fall 1964):<br />

619.<br />

13. The butterfly figures as a powerful romantic metaphor in La Somme et<br />

le Reste (see, especially, Tome II, p. 428), even as a symbol of <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s<br />

anarchist tendencies. One incident in particular is recalled, from <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s<br />

military service in 1926. Out on an infantry exercise one early summer<br />

morning, “I glimpsed ten steps ahead of me, at the side of the lane, a lovely<br />

butterfly whose rose wings where damp; this prevented him from flying. I<br />

hastened myself, took him as delicately as possible and placed him down<br />

on the embankment.” Three seconds later, a corporal sticks a rifle butt in<br />

<strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s back. The captain on horseback shouts, “Chasseur <strong>Lefebvre</strong>! 8<br />

days in police detention.” “This lad announces himself as a dangerous subversive<br />

element … a soft dreamer, a saviour of butterflies … an intellectual<br />

anarchist.”<br />

14. Critique of Everyday Life—Volume II, p. 348 (emphasis in original).<br />

175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!