Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

selforganizedseminar.files.wordpress.com
from selforganizedseminar.files.wordpress.com More from this publisher
02.07.2013 Views

Afterword: The End of History or the “Total Man”? Bitterness and relief at the end. We would be able to continue for a lot longer still. We have so much more to say. We sometimes seemed to let slip something essential. Why have we consecrated the last discussion to utopia? Is it by our unanimous taste for paradox and challenge? No, it’s rather because each one of us knows that all projects, theoretical or otherwise, slumber into boredom if they don’t comprise a utopian dimension. It was, in the final analysis, a marvellous autumn. —Henri Lefebvre, La révolution n’est plus ce qu’elle était The “total man” was nothing less than the realization of Henri Lefebvre’s metaphilosophy: a Dionysian who’s free and smart, versatile and sensual, who’s peeled back the multiple layers of capitalist mystification and commodity reification, and who 161

H e n r i L e F e b v r e knows not only his real self but also his real relations with fellow human beings. Imagine the limit to infinity, Lefebvre urges us, a blurry figure on a distant horizon, beyond our present purview, perhaps beyond anything we’ve yet imagined. Here is a man and a woman separating who we are from what we might be. The total man represents a goal, an ideal, a possibility, not a historical fact; it may never become an actual fact. It comes, if it comes, without guarantees, giving “direction to our view of the future, to our activities and our consciousness.” 1 It symbolizes a route open to active human practice, to thought and struggle, to striving and praxis “subjectively” overcoming “objective” conditions in the world. Nothing is assured or definitive, predestined or certain; the totality of the total man is an “open totality.” The total man shouldn’t be confused with the happy, smiling “new man” depicted in Socialist-Realist art, toiling for the state, somebody who’s suddenly burst forth into history, complete and ready-made like a TV dinner, “in possession of all hitherto incompatible qualities of vitality and lucidity, of humble determination in labor and limitless enthusiasm in creation.” 2 The total person is “all Nature,” says Lefebvre; everything lies within the grasp of this supercharacter, within this superman and superwoman who contain “all energies of matter and of life,” as well as the whole past and future of the world. They’re the conscience of a world gone haywire, intent on destroying itself, cannibalizing itself. Science has split the atom, propelled us to the moon, pioneered genetic engineering—and yet, we insist on truncating ourselves, impoverishing ourselves, exploiting one and another, warring and wasting vital powers, a life force hell-bent on death and annihilation. The total man approaches us from ahead, as our nemesis, looking back over his shoulder, justifiably wary and even a little incredulous. Can we raise our heads and look him in the eye? Do we have the courage to commune with him across the abyss? Lefebvre hopes we can. “Even today, at a time when our 162

H e n r i L e F e b v r e<br />

knows not only his real self but also his real relations with fellow<br />

human beings. Imagine the limit to infinity, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> urges<br />

us, a blurry figure on a distant horizon, beyond our present purview,<br />

perhaps beyond anything we’ve yet imagined. Here is a man<br />

and a woman separating who we are from what we might be. The<br />

total man represents a goal, an ideal, a possibility, not a historical<br />

fact; it may never become an actual fact. It comes, if it comes,<br />

without guarantees, giving “direction to our view of the future,<br />

to our activities and our consciousness.” 1 It symbolizes a route<br />

open to active human practice, to thought and struggle, to striving<br />

and praxis “subjectively” overcoming “objective” conditions<br />

in the world. Nothing is assured or definitive, predestined or certain;<br />

the totality of the total man is an “open totality.” The total<br />

man shouldn’t be confused with the happy, smiling “new man”<br />

depicted in Socialist-Realist art, toiling for the state, somebody<br />

who’s suddenly burst forth into history, complete and ready-made<br />

like a TV dinner, “in possession of all hitherto incompatible qualities<br />

of vitality and lucidity, of humble determination in labor and<br />

limitless enthusiasm in creation.” 2<br />

The total person is “all Nature,” says <strong>Lefebvre</strong>; everything<br />

lies within the grasp of this supercharacter, within this superman<br />

and superwoman who contain “all energies of matter and of<br />

life,” as well as the whole past and future of the world. They’re the<br />

conscience of a world gone haywire, intent on destroying itself,<br />

cannibalizing itself. Science has split the atom, propelled us to<br />

the moon, pioneered genetic engineering—and yet, we insist on<br />

truncating ourselves, impoverishing ourselves, exploiting one and<br />

another, warring and wasting vital powers, a life force hell-bent on<br />

death and annihilation. The total man approaches us from ahead,<br />

as our nemesis, looking back over his shoulder, justifiably wary<br />

and even a little incredulous. Can we raise our heads and look him<br />

in the eye? Do we have the courage to commune with him across<br />

the abyss? <strong>Lefebvre</strong> hopes we can. “Even today, at a time when our<br />

162

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!