Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Afterword: The End of History or the “Total Man”? Bitterness and relief at the end. We would be able to continue for a lot longer still. We have so much more to say. We sometimes seemed to let slip something essential. Why have we consecrated the last discussion to utopia? Is it by our unanimous taste for paradox and challenge? No, it’s rather because each one of us knows that all projects, theoretical or otherwise, slumber into boredom if they don’t comprise a utopian dimension. It was, in the final analysis, a marvellous autumn. —Henri Lefebvre, La révolution n’est plus ce qu’elle était The “total man” was nothing less than the realization of Henri Lefebvre’s metaphilosophy: a Dionysian who’s free and smart, versatile and sensual, who’s peeled back the multiple layers of capitalist mystification and commodity reification, and who 161
H e n r i L e F e b v r e knows not only his real self but also his real relations with fellow human beings. Imagine the limit to infinity, Lefebvre urges us, a blurry figure on a distant horizon, beyond our present purview, perhaps beyond anything we’ve yet imagined. Here is a man and a woman separating who we are from what we might be. The total man represents a goal, an ideal, a possibility, not a historical fact; it may never become an actual fact. It comes, if it comes, without guarantees, giving “direction to our view of the future, to our activities and our consciousness.” 1 It symbolizes a route open to active human practice, to thought and struggle, to striving and praxis “subjectively” overcoming “objective” conditions in the world. Nothing is assured or definitive, predestined or certain; the totality of the total man is an “open totality.” The total man shouldn’t be confused with the happy, smiling “new man” depicted in Socialist-Realist art, toiling for the state, somebody who’s suddenly burst forth into history, complete and ready-made like a TV dinner, “in possession of all hitherto incompatible qualities of vitality and lucidity, of humble determination in labor and limitless enthusiasm in creation.” 2 The total person is “all Nature,” says Lefebvre; everything lies within the grasp of this supercharacter, within this superman and superwoman who contain “all energies of matter and of life,” as well as the whole past and future of the world. They’re the conscience of a world gone haywire, intent on destroying itself, cannibalizing itself. Science has split the atom, propelled us to the moon, pioneered genetic engineering—and yet, we insist on truncating ourselves, impoverishing ourselves, exploiting one and another, warring and wasting vital powers, a life force hell-bent on death and annihilation. The total man approaches us from ahead, as our nemesis, looking back over his shoulder, justifiably wary and even a little incredulous. Can we raise our heads and look him in the eye? Do we have the courage to commune with him across the abyss? Lefebvre hopes we can. “Even today, at a time when our 162
- Page 145 and 146: H e n r i L e F e b v r e rather th
- Page 147 and 148: H e n r i L e F e b v r e over and
- Page 149 and 150: H e n r i L e F e b v r e space, ex
- Page 151 and 152: H e n r i L e F e b v r e latter’
- Page 153 and 154: H e n r i L e F e b v r e In a 1985
- Page 155 and 156: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Guts, as
- Page 157 and 158: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Henri Lef
- Page 159 and 160: H e n r i L e F e b v r e work is p
- Page 161 and 162: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the blank
- Page 163 and 164: H e n r i L e F e b v r e better,
- Page 165 and 166: H e n r i L e F e b v r e against a
- Page 167 and 168: H e n r i L e F e b v r e a crucial
- Page 169 and 170: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Davos, Sw
- Page 171 and 172: H e n r i L e F e b v r e exploitat
- Page 173 and 174: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the mold
- Page 175 and 176: H e n r i L e F e b v r e followed
- Page 177 and 178: H e n r i L e F e b v r e excited b
- Page 179 and 180: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Coming ho
- Page 181 and 182: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the age o
- Page 183 and 184: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the Unhap
- Page 185 and 186: H e n r i L e F e b v r e people’
- Page 187 and 188: H e n r i L e F e b v r e conscious
- Page 189 and 190: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Modern ma
- Page 191 and 192: H e n r i L e F e b v r e idea. The
- Page 193 and 194: H e n r i L e F e b v r e and Nietz
- Page 195: H e n r i L e F e b v r e overcome
- Page 199 and 200: H e n r i L e F e b v r e bad rap w
- Page 201 and 202: H e n r i L e F e b v r e claimed t
- Page 203 and 204: H e n r i L e F e b v r e The shift
- Page 205 and 206: H e n r i L e F e b v r e and revel
- Page 207 and 208: n o t e s 6. Manuel Castells, “Ci
- Page 209 and 210: n o t e s 20. Critique of Everyday
- Page 211 and 212: n o t e s 15. Stéphane Mallarmé,
- Page 213 and 214: n o t e s entrepreneurial, often su
- Page 215 and 216: n o t e s borrow their themes from
- Page 217 and 218: n o t e s Capitalism,” Geografisk
- Page 219 and 220: n o t e s 6. Manuel Castells, The U
- Page 221 and 222: n o t e s 17. Lefebvre, Autogestion
- Page 223 and 224: n o t e s place to place and make i
- Page 226 and 227: A Adorno, Theodor, 175n10 Allen, Wo
- Page 228 and 229: L Lassalle, Ferdinand, 128 Lautréa
- Page 230 and 231: Monopoly capitalism, 9-10, 11, 22,
- Page 232 and 233: “The Head of Don Quixote”: Henr
- Page 234 and 235: Brueghel, Pieter the Elder, Fight B
- Page 236 and 237: The Pompidou Center: from Lefebvre
- Page 238: Lefebvre to Guterman, October 18, 1
H e n r i L e F e b v r e<br />
knows not only his real self but also his real relations with fellow<br />
human beings. Imagine the limit to infinity, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> urges<br />
us, a blurry figure on a distant horizon, beyond our present purview,<br />
perhaps beyond anything we’ve yet imagined. Here is a man<br />
and a woman separating who we are from what we might be. The<br />
total man represents a goal, an ideal, a possibility, not a historical<br />
fact; it may never become an actual fact. It comes, if it comes,<br />
without guarantees, giving “direction to our view of the future,<br />
to our activities and our consciousness.” 1 It symbolizes a route<br />
open to active human practice, to thought and struggle, to striving<br />
and praxis “subjectively” overcoming “objective” conditions<br />
in the world. Nothing is assured or definitive, predestined or certain;<br />
the totality of the total man is an “open totality.” The total<br />
man shouldn’t be confused with the happy, smiling “new man”<br />
depicted in Socialist-Realist art, toiling for the state, somebody<br />
who’s suddenly burst forth into history, complete and ready-made<br />
like a TV dinner, “in possession of all hitherto incompatible qualities<br />
of vitality and lucidity, of humble determination in labor and<br />
limitless enthusiasm in creation.” 2<br />
The total person is “all Nature,” says <strong>Lefebvre</strong>; everything<br />
lies within the grasp of this supercharacter, within this superman<br />
and superwoman who contain “all energies of matter and of<br />
life,” as well as the whole past and future of the world. They’re the<br />
conscience of a world gone haywire, intent on destroying itself,<br />
cannibalizing itself. Science has split the atom, propelled us to<br />
the moon, pioneered genetic engineering—and yet, we insist on<br />
truncating ourselves, impoverishing ourselves, exploiting one and<br />
another, warring and wasting vital powers, a life force hell-bent on<br />
death and annihilation. The total man approaches us from ahead,<br />
as our nemesis, looking back over his shoulder, justifiably wary<br />
and even a little incredulous. Can we raise our heads and look him<br />
in the eye? Do we have the courage to commune with him across<br />
the abyss? <strong>Lefebvre</strong> hopes we can. “Even today, at a time when our<br />
162