Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
U r b a n i t y “I would’ve liked to have taught in Moscow,” he admitted in 1988. But each time he tried, “they always denied it me.”) 13 He journeyed to Italy, adored Venice and Florence; he traveled throughout North America and South America, went to New York (with Norbert Guterman) and Los Angeles, to Montreal and Toronto; he lectured in Mexico City and Santiago; in San Paulo, Rio, and Brasilia; in Caracas and Buenos Aires. In Africa, he knew Algiers and Tunis, Casablanca and Dakar. He toured around Iran and China, discovered Tehran and Shanghai and Beijing; went to Japan and Tokyo and onward on to Australia and Sydney. In 1983 to 1984, at the invitation of literary critic Fredric Jameson, Lefebvre spent a semester in the History of Consciousness Program at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and deepened his fascination—and disgust—with West Coast–style urbanization. “It’s extremely difficult to give an answer to the question of which city one likes and dislikes,” he once owned up, “for detestable cities are intriguing. Take Los Angeles. For a European it’s appalling and unlivable. You can’t get around without a car and you pay exorbitant sums to park it. … What fascinates and disgusts me are the streets of luxury shops with superb windows but which you can’t enter into. … These streets are empty. And not far from there, you have a street, a neighborhood, where 200,000 Salvadorian immigrants are exploited to death in cellars and lofts.” Yet there is “singing and dancing,” he says, “something stupendous and fascinating. You are and yet you’re not in a city, stretching for 150 kilometers, with twelve million inhabitants. Such wealth! Such poverty!” At the same time, “you feel that the Hispanics have a counterculture, and they make the society, the music, painting (the murals they’ve created are beautiful).” 14 Lefebvre took numerous trips to Los Angeles. One time, he and Jameson (who was then working on his Bonaventure Hotel/Postmodernism article), together with UCLA geographer–planner Ed Soja, did a downtown tour. “He was fascinated,” recalled Soja, “particularly by the 73
H e n r i L e F e b v r e Estrada Courts public housing project, where nearly all the walls are covered with murals, the most notable being a stark picture of Che with the admonition ‘We are not a Minority!’ ” 15 Cities attaining the heady status of œuvres nonetheless remained dearest to Lefebvre’s heart. Venice is adored, a city reshaped by time and literally receding into the sea, yet living on as a great work of art, as an architectural and monumental unity, with its misty, haunting melancholy, sound tracked by Mahler’s 5th Symphony; it’s a city, says Lefebvre, at once “unique, original and primordial,” despite the tourists, despite its “spectacularization.” 16 Every bit of Venice “is part of a great hymn to diversity in pleasure and inventiveness in celebration, revelry and sumptuous ritual.” 17 Is Venice “not a theatrical city, not to say a theater-city— where actors and the audience are the same in the multiplicity of their roles and relations? Accordingly, one can imagine the Venice of Casanova, and Visconti’s Senso [and Death in Venice], as the Venice of today.” 18 Lefebvre’s favorite city, however, is Florence, beside the Arno, a “symbolic flower,” immortalized in Lorenzaccio (1834) by one of his heroes, Alfred de Musset. (“The banks of the Arno are full of so many goodbyes,” said Musset.) “Florence has ceased recently to be a mummified city, a museum city,” Lefebvre said in 1980, “and has found again an activity, thanks to small industries on its periphery.” 19 “So what I like is Los Angeles for the fascination, Florence for the pleasure and Paris to live in.” 20 Even as an octogenarian, Lefebvre continued to probe the city, reached out into seemingly uncharted theoretical territory. His urban fascination never relented, even though he’d seen it all, perhaps many times over. He marveled at the everyday rhythms that ripple and syncopate urban life and, as such, coined a new theoretical practice: rhythmanalysis, the eponymous title of his final book, written with wife Catherine Regulier. All of which heralded, in his own words, “nothing less than a new science, 74
- Page 57 and 58: H e n r i L e F e b v r e “turbo-
- Page 59 and 60: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the poten
- Page 61 and 62: H e n r i L e F e b v r e possibili
- Page 63 and 64: H e n r i L e F e b v r e contempt,
- Page 65 and 66: H e n r i L e F e b v r e or collap
- Page 67 and 68: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the Frenc
- Page 69 and 70: H e n r i L e F e b v r e periphera
- Page 71 and 72: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Lefebvre
- Page 73 and 74: H e n r i L e F e b v r e feelings
- Page 75 and 76: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Lefebvre
- Page 77 and 78: H e n r i L e F e b v r e the Hotel
- Page 79 and 80: H e n r i L e F e b v r e found the
- Page 81 and 82: H e n r i L e F e b v r e thought i
- Page 83 and 84: H e n r i L e F e b v r e examinati
- Page 85 and 86: H e n r i L e F e b v r e with cohe
- Page 87 and 88: H e n r i L e F e b v r e in Quebec
- Page 89 and 90: H e n r i L e F e b v r e “the sc
- Page 91 and 92: H e n r i L e F e b v r e into a si
- Page 93 and 94: H e n r i L e F e b v r e common fo
- Page 95 and 96: H e n r i L e F e b v r e alienatio
- Page 97 and 98: H e n r i L e F e b v r e history,
- Page 99 and 100: H e n r i L e F e b v r e of a thou
- Page 101 and 102: H e n r i L e F e b v r e self-cons
- Page 103 and 104: H e n r i L e F e b v r e To some e
- Page 105 and 106: H e n r i L e F e b v r e nearby, c
- Page 107: H e n r i L e F e b v r e wherewith
- Page 111 and 112: H e n r i L e F e b v r e twenty-th
- Page 114 and 115: 5 Urban Revolution It is in the cou
- Page 116 and 117: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n revol
- Page 118 and 119: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n real
- Page 120 and 121: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n natur
- Page 122 and 123: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n of ur
- Page 124 and 125: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n globa
- Page 126 and 127: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n the d
- Page 128 and 129: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n the s
- Page 130 and 131: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n exces
- Page 132: U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n deep
- Page 135 and 136: H e n r i L e F e b v r e illustrio
- Page 137 and 138: H e n r i L e F e b v r e intellect
- Page 139 and 140: H e n r i L e F e b v r e denigrate
- Page 141 and 142: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Here we h
- Page 143 and 144: H e n r i L e F e b v r e emergent
- Page 145 and 146: H e n r i L e F e b v r e rather th
- Page 147 and 148: H e n r i L e F e b v r e over and
- Page 149 and 150: H e n r i L e F e b v r e space, ex
- Page 151 and 152: H e n r i L e F e b v r e latter’
- Page 153 and 154: H e n r i L e F e b v r e In a 1985
- Page 155 and 156: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Guts, as
- Page 157 and 158: H e n r i L e F e b v r e Henri Lef
U r b a n i t y<br />
“I would’ve liked to have taught in Moscow,” he admitted in 1988.<br />
But each time he tried, “they always denied it me.”) 13 He journeyed<br />
to Italy, adored Venice and Florence; he traveled throughout North<br />
America and South America, went to New York (with Norbert<br />
Guterman) and Los Angeles, to Montreal and Toronto; he lectured<br />
in Mexico City and Santiago; in San Paulo, Rio, and Brasilia; in<br />
Caracas and Buenos Aires. In Africa, he knew Algiers and Tunis,<br />
Casablanca and Dakar. He toured around Iran and China, discovered<br />
Tehran and Shanghai and Beijing; went to Japan and Tokyo<br />
and onward on to Australia and Sydney.<br />
In 1983 to 1984, at the invitation of literary critic Fredric<br />
Jameson, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> spent a semester in the History of Consciousness<br />
Program at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and deepened<br />
his fascination—and disgust—with West Coast–style urbanization.<br />
“It’s extremely difficult to give an answer to the question of<br />
which city one likes and dislikes,” he once owned up, “for detestable<br />
cities are intriguing. Take Los Angeles. For a European it’s<br />
appalling and unlivable. You can’t get around without a car and<br />
you pay exorbitant sums to park it. … What fascinates and disgusts<br />
me are the streets of luxury shops with superb windows but<br />
which you can’t enter into. … These streets are empty. And not<br />
far from there, you have a street, a neighborhood, where 200,000<br />
Salvadorian immigrants are exploited to death in cellars and lofts.”<br />
Yet there is “singing and dancing,” he says, “something stupendous<br />
and fascinating. You are and yet you’re not in a city, stretching<br />
for 150 kilometers, with twelve million inhabitants. Such wealth!<br />
Such poverty!” At the same time, “you feel that the Hispanics have<br />
a counterculture, and they make the society, the music, painting<br />
(the murals they’ve created are beautiful).” 14 <strong>Lefebvre</strong> took numerous<br />
trips to Los Angeles. One time, he and Jameson (who was<br />
then working on his Bonaventure Hotel/Postmodernism article),<br />
together with UCLA geographer–planner Ed Soja, did a downtown<br />
tour. “He was fascinated,” recalled Soja, “particularly by the<br />
73