01.07.2013 Views

Effects of diabaticity on fusion of heavy nuclei in the dinuclear model ...

Effects of diabaticity on fusion of heavy nuclei in the dinuclear model ...

Effects of diabaticity on fusion of heavy nuclei in the dinuclear model ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B Here, j<br />

i<br />

<strong>the</strong> height <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> fusi<strong>on</strong> barriers Bλ<br />

fus (t) andBη fus , and quasi-fissi<strong>on</strong> barrier<br />

denotes<br />

B λ . The values <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Bη<br />

fus qf<br />

Bλ<br />

qf and<br />

are practically <strong>in</strong>dependent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> time. The <strong>in</strong>itial DNS <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>the</strong> reacti<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>sidered here are <strong>in</strong> or near <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imum <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> total potential energy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong><br />

system as a functi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> λ and η. Moreover, <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmodynamic equilibrium because<br />

<strong>the</strong> diabatic and adiabatic potentials practically co<strong>in</strong>cide. The temperature T (λ t) is calculated<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> expressi<strong>on</strong> T (λ t)= E ∗ (λ t)/a where λ t is <strong>the</strong> el<strong>on</strong>gati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> touch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>nuclei</strong>, i.e.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial DNS. In <strong>the</strong> calculati<strong>on</strong>s we assume that <strong>the</strong> excitati<strong>on</strong> energy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial DNS<br />

is E ∗ (λ t)=30 MeV <strong>in</strong> all reacti<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>sidered. In (6.9), ω B j<br />

i is <strong>the</strong> frequency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>verted<br />

harm<strong>on</strong>ic oscillator approximat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> variable j <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> top <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> fusi<strong>on</strong> or<br />

barriers B quasifissi<strong>on</strong> j<br />

i ,andω is <strong>the</strong> frequency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> harm<strong>on</strong>ic oscillator approximat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

j<br />

j<br />

<strong>the</strong> variable j for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial DNS. The frequencies ωB i and ωj are calculated us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> potential<br />

<strong>the</strong> absolute values <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d derivative <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> potential with respect to <strong>the</strong> variable j (<strong>on</strong><br />

top <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> barrier B <strong>the</strong> j<br />

i<br />

j<br />

Mjj (e.g, ωB i = mass parameter |∂2V/∂j2 i B |<br />

and for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial DNS, respectively) as well as <strong>the</strong> corresp<strong>on</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

j<br />

/Mjj ). The method <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> calculati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> mass<br />

parameters Mηη and M λλ is presented <strong>in</strong> chapter 5 [43]. The microscopical values <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Mηη and<br />

Mλλ are close to <strong>the</strong> corresp<strong>on</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g hydrodynamical values [84] at <strong>the</strong> touch<strong>in</strong>g c<strong>on</strong>figurati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>nuclei</strong> (see chapter 5). In our calculati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> fusi<strong>on</strong> probabilities, <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g values<br />

B λ<br />

η<br />

qf ≈ B<br />

0.8—1.0 MeV, ¯hω fus ≈ 1.5—2.0 MeV, ¯hωλ ≈ 1.5—2.0 MeV and ¯hωη ≈ 0.8—1.0<br />

¯hω used are<br />

B<br />

λ<br />

reacti<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>sidered. The value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ¯hω fus at <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner fusi<strong>on</strong> barrier <strong>in</strong> λ is about<br />

<strong>the</strong> for MeV<br />

0.5—0.6 MeV and agrees with <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>e obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> calculati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fissi<strong>on</strong> [116] at <strong>the</strong> saddle<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t. The fricti<strong>on</strong> coefficients ((5.9) and (5.23)) <strong>in</strong> λ and <strong>in</strong> η obta<strong>in</strong>ed with Γ=2 MeV at<br />

<strong>the</strong> touch<strong>in</strong>g c<strong>on</strong>figurati<strong>on</strong> λt have <strong>the</strong> same order <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> magnitude as <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>es calculated with<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>e-body dissipati<strong>on</strong> <strong>model</strong>s [34]. The values obta<strong>in</strong>ed for P λ(η)<br />

fus<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r weakly <strong>on</strong><br />

depend<br />

Γ <strong>in</strong> (6.9)[34]. The possibility to apply <strong>the</strong> Kramers expressi<strong>on</strong> to relatively small barriers<br />

(B j<br />

/T > 0.5) was dem<strong>on</strong>strated <strong>in</strong> [117].<br />

i<br />

6.1 Results and discussi<strong>on</strong><br />

The time-dependent diabatic potentials for <strong>the</strong> reacti<strong>on</strong>s 110 Pd+ 110 Pd and 124 Sn+ 124 Sn are<br />

<strong>in</strong> Figs. 6-2a and 6-2b. The time-dependent <strong>in</strong>ner fusi<strong>on</strong> barrier B presented λ<br />

fus<br />

87<br />

<strong>in</strong> λ appears

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!