Effects of diabaticity on fusion of heavy nuclei in the dinuclear model ...
Effects of diabaticity on fusion of heavy nuclei in the dinuclear model ...
Effects of diabaticity on fusion of heavy nuclei in the dinuclear model ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
follow<strong>in</strong>g ratio <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> limit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an irrotati<strong>on</strong>al flow was derived <strong>in</strong> [100]<br />
M irr<br />
/γ ν<br />
irr<br />
= ν<br />
where β is <strong>the</strong> coefficient <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> two-body viscosity and r0 =1.2 fm.<br />
3A2/3 1<br />
(5.24)<br />
,<br />
β 1)r0 − +1)(ν 8π(2ν<br />
5.1.3 Derivati<strong>on</strong> from <strong>the</strong> mean—field crank<strong>in</strong>g formula<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle particle spectrum ɛα and <strong>the</strong> corresp<strong>on</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g wave functi<strong>on</strong>s |α >, <strong>on</strong>e can<br />
obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mass parameter with <strong>the</strong> crank<strong>in</strong>g formula [94]<br />
M cr =¯h 2 α=β<br />
| |2 n(ɛα) n(ɛβ) −<br />
(5.25)<br />
.<br />
ɛα − ɛβ<br />
In reality <strong>the</strong> Hamilt<strong>on</strong>ian <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> system c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s a residual two-body <strong>in</strong>teracti<strong>on</strong> between <strong>the</strong><br />
nucle<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> additi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> mean field. The residual coupl<strong>in</strong>g distributes <strong>the</strong> strength <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
particle states over more complicated states. This spectral smooth<strong>in</strong>g has <strong>the</strong> effect that <strong>the</strong><br />
sum over α and β appear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> (5.25) also <strong>in</strong>cludes diag<strong>on</strong>al terms with α = β. Let us prove<br />
this statement.<br />
The Eq.(5.25) can be rewritten as<br />
M cr =¯h 2 <br />
α=β<br />
Next we use <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g replacements<br />
and <strong>the</strong> approximati<strong>on</strong><br />
<br />
dɛ1δ(ɛ1 <br />
dɛ2 − ɛα) δ(ɛ2 2 n(ɛ1) n(ɛ2) −<br />
(5.26)<br />
.<br />
ɛ1 − ɛ2<br />
Γ<br />
(ɛ − ɛk) 2 +(Γ/2) 2<br />
, (5.27)<br />
(5.28)<br />
D 2 2 k1k2 | ≈|F 2 (5.29)<br />
.<br />
Here, D =1/g is <strong>the</strong> average energy distance between s<strong>in</strong>gle particle states. We <strong>the</strong>n express<br />
64