Effects of diabaticity on fusion of heavy nuclei in the dinuclear model ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3-2: Diabatic contribution ∆Vdiab as a function <strong>of</strong> elongation λ for the system Figure 100Mo+ Mo (solid line). The neutron and proton diabatic contributions are shown by dotted and 100 dashed lines, respectively. The nuclei are considered spherical with ε =0.74. phenomenological double folding potential [65]. A discrepancy with the adiabatic potential is seen for small elongations where the phenomenological potential is more repulsive than the diabatic one. The discrepancy becomes smaller if we take into account a decrease <strong>of</strong> ε with decreasing elongation. This is demonstrated for the system 110 Pd+ 110 Pd in Fig. 3-6, where the diabatic potential is shown as a function <strong>of</strong> ε for constant values <strong>of</strong> λ. The minimum <strong>of</strong> the diabatic potential moves to smaller values <strong>of</strong> ε with decreasing values <strong>of</strong> λ (or R). Fig. 3-6 shows diabatic potentials for the systems 96 Zr+ 96 Zr and 90 Zr+ 90 Zr as a function <strong>of</strong> ε for λ =1.54 near to the minimum <strong>of</strong> the pocket in λ. The diabatic contribution is smaller as a function <strong>of</strong> ε for the 96 Zr+ 96 Zr system than for the 90 Zr+ 90 Zr system (lower part <strong>of</strong> Fig. 3-7). The reason for this can be seen through an analysis <strong>of</strong> the single particle spectra (Fig. 3-8). In the case <strong>of</strong> 90 Zr+ 90 Zr, more diabatic levels with larger slopes cross the Fermi-level at larger values <strong>of</strong> ε. From Figs. 3-3 and 3-8 it follows that the diabatic contributions are larger with respect to the relative coordinate than with respect to the neck coordinate. This is explained by the number <strong>of</strong> crossings <strong>of</strong> diabatic states in the variation <strong>of</strong> both coordinates. In most systems 29
E diab (MeV) n 60 55 50 45 40 100Mo + 100Mo 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 3-3: Diagram <strong>of</strong> diabatic neutron levels with jz =1/2 near the Fermi level (squares) for Figure Mo + 100 Mo as a function <strong>of</strong> λ. The nuclei are considered as spherical with ε =0.74. The 100 levels are calculated with the diabatic Hamiltonian (3.4) using the maximum symmetry diabatic method. 30 λ
Page 1 and 2: Effects of
Page 3 and 4: 1 Introduction 6 1.1 The DNS-concep
Page 5 and 6: Chapter 1 The elements existing in
Page 7 and 8: observed the rapid fall-of<
Page 9 and 10: Figure 1-1 illustrates the compound
Page 11 and 12: smaller than the extra-extra push e
Page 13 and 14: fusion and quasi-fission processes
Page 15 and 16: In the present chapter we have pres
Page 17 and 18: higher collective velocities to rep
Page 19 and 20: 2.1 General considerations We want
Page 21 and 22: couplings. Diabatic basis states ψ
Page 23 and 24: Chapter 3 The synthesis of<
Page 25 and 26: is calculated within the TCSM using
Page 27: E adiab (MeV) n E diab (MeV) n 30 2
Page 31 and 32: 3-5: Diabatic potentials for the sy
Page 33 and 34: 3-7: The same as in Fig. 3-6 for th
Page 35 and 36: The estimated collective velocities
Page 37 and 38: 3-10: Diabatic contributions as a f
Page 39 and 40: effects give a justification for th
Page 41 and 42: The similarity of
Page 43 and 44: 4.1.3 Alternative microscopical met
Page 45 and 46: to the DNS concept [18, 34], cross
Page 47 and 48: U (MeV) 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20
Page 49 and 50: U (MeV) 35 30 25 20 15 10 90Zr + 12
Page 51 and 52: 4-1: Fusion barriers B Table TCSM
Page 53 and 54: U (MeV) 40 30 20 10 20 10 0 a) b) 9
Page 55 and 56: experimental separation energy allo
Page 57 and 58: means a neglect of
Page 59 and 60: the case of an ind
Page 61 and 62: single particle density matrix exte
Page 63 and 64: following ratio in the limit <stron
Page 65 and 66: 5-1: Dependence of
Page 67 and 68: the microscopical mass parameter <s
Page 69 and 70: 5-3: Mass parameter Mεε as a func
Page 71 and 72: 5-4: Mass parameter Mεε as a func
Page 73 and 74: the approximate expressions (Eqs. (
Page 75 and 76: (10 3 m fm 2) M , M λλ εε 25 20
Page 77 and 78: (10 3 m fm 2) M εε M (10 λλ 4 m
Page 79 and 80:
~ f k (MeV -1) 0,20 0,15 0,10 0,05
Page 81 and 82:
V (MeV) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 1
Page 83 and 84:
to the dependence of</stron
Page 85 and 86:
where the lifetime t 0 of</
Page 87 and 88:
6-2: a) Time-dependent dynamical po
Page 89 and 90:
Table 6-1: Quasi-fission and inner
Page 91 and 92:
6-3: Time-dependent average width <
Page 93 and 94:
Chapter 7 In the quasi-fission proc
Page 95 and 96:
The value of t0 is
Page 97 and 98:
Y Z Y A 0,10 0,08 0,06 0,04 0,02 0,
Page 99 and 100:
estimated from the difference betwe
Page 101 and 102:
elements from Z=104 to Z=112 in the
Page 103 and 104:
fission process is an important fac
Page 105 and 106:
the neck coordinate ε and
Page 107 and 108:
• The time-dependent transition b
Page 109 and 110:
Appendix A For describing nucleus-n
Page 111 and 112:
where The volume is V0 = 1 2 m0ϖ 2
Page 113 and 114:
ϕ nz(z) = ⎧ ⎪⎨ ⎪⎩ C−1
Page 115 and 116:
Appendix B The collective response
Page 117 and 118:
[1] S.G.Nilsson et al., Phys. Lett.
Page 119 and 120:
[27] N.V.Antonenko et al., in 1 st
Page 121 and 122:
[63] Yu.F.Smirnov and Yu.M.Tchuvil
Page 123 and 124:
[97] H. Hofmann et
show all

Effects of diabaticity on fusion of heavy nuclei in the dinuclear model ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?