Effects of diabaticity on fusion of heavy nuclei in the dinuclear model ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Y Z 0,14 0,12 0,10 0,08 0,06 0,04 0,02 110Pd + 136Xe 86Kr + 160Gd 76Ge + 170Er 0,00 0 10 20 30 40 50 7-4: Charge distributions <strong>of</strong> the quasi-fission products for the reactions Figure 110 Pd+ 136 Xe =0.1, solid line), (η 86 + Kr 160 (η =0.3, dashed line) and Gd 76 + Ge 170 (η =0.4, dotted Er which lead to the same compound nucleus line) 246 The arrows denote the initial DNS. Fm. excitation energy <strong>of</strong> the initial DNS formed in these reactions is E The ∗ =20MeV. Z 103
fission process is an important factor which reduces the probability <strong>of</strong> complete fusion <strong>of</strong> heavy nuclei. Since the quasi-fission dominates in the cold and hot fusion reactions, the comparison <strong>of</strong> the theoretical and experimental data is a critical test for the existing fusion models. 104
Page 1 and 2:
Effects of
Page 3 and 4:
1 Introduction 6 1.1 The DNS-concep
Page 5 and 6:
Chapter 1 The elements existing in
Page 7 and 8:
observed the rapid fall-of<
Page 9 and 10:
Figure 1-1 illustrates the compound
Page 11 and 12:
smaller than the extra-extra push e
Page 13 and 14:
fusion and quasi-fission processes
Page 15 and 16:
In the present chapter we have pres
Page 17 and 18:
higher collective velocities to rep
Page 19 and 20:
2.1 General considerations We want
Page 21 and 22:
couplings. Diabatic basis states ψ
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 3 The synthesis of<
Page 25 and 26:
is calculated within the TCSM using
Page 27 and 28:
E adiab (MeV) n E diab (MeV) n 30 2
Page 29 and 30:
E diab (MeV) n 60 55 50 45 40 100Mo
Page 31 and 32:
3-5: Diabatic potentials for the sy
Page 33 and 34:
3-7: The same as in Fig. 3-6 for th
Page 35 and 36:
The estimated collective velocities
Page 37 and 38:
3-10: Diabatic contributions as a f
Page 39 and 40:
effects give a justification for th
Page 41 and 42:
The similarity of
Page 43 and 44:
4.1.3 Alternative microscopical met
Page 45 and 46:
to the DNS concept [18, 34], cross
Page 47 and 48:
U (MeV) 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20
Page 49 and 50:
U (MeV) 35 30 25 20 15 10 90Zr + 12
Page 51 and 52: 4-1: Fusion barriers B Table TCSM
Page 53 and 54: U (MeV) 40 30 20 10 20 10 0 a) b) 9
Page 55 and 56: experimental separation energy allo
Page 57 and 58: means a neglect of
Page 59 and 60: the case of an ind
Page 61 and 62: single particle density matrix exte
Page 63 and 64: following ratio in the limit <stron
Page 65 and 66: 5-1: Dependence of
Page 67 and 68: the microscopical mass parameter <s
Page 69 and 70: 5-3: Mass parameter Mεε as a func
Page 71 and 72: 5-4: Mass parameter Mεε as a func
Page 73 and 74: the approximate expressions (Eqs. (
Page 75 and 76: (10 3 m fm 2) M , M λλ εε 25 20
Page 77 and 78: (10 3 m fm 2) M εε M (10 λλ 4 m
Page 79 and 80: ~ f k (MeV -1) 0,20 0,15 0,10 0,05
Page 81 and 82: V (MeV) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 1
Page 83 and 84: to the dependence of</stron
Page 85 and 86: where the lifetime t 0 of</
Page 87 and 88: 6-2: a) Time-dependent dynamical po
Page 89 and 90: Table 6-1: Quasi-fission and inner
Page 91 and 92: 6-3: Time-dependent average width <
Page 93 and 94: Chapter 7 In the quasi-fission proc
Page 95 and 96: The value of t0 is
Page 97 and 98: Y Z Y A 0,10 0,08 0,06 0,04 0,02 0,
Page 99 and 100: estimated from the difference betwe
Page 101: elements from Z=104 to Z=112 in the
Page 105 and 106: the neck coordinate ε and
Page 107 and 108: • The time-dependent transition b
Page 109 and 110: Appendix A For describing nucleus-n
Page 111 and 112: where The volume is V0 = 1 2 m0ϖ 2
Page 113 and 114: ϕ nz(z) = ⎧ ⎪⎨ ⎪⎩ C−1
Page 115 and 116: Appendix B The collective response
Page 117 and 118: [1] S.G.Nilsson et al., Phys. Lett.
Page 119 and 120: [27] N.V.Antonenko et al., in 1 st
Page 121 and 122: [63] Yu.F.Smirnov and Yu.M.Tchuvil
Page 123 and 124: [97] H. Hofmann et
show all

Effects of diabaticity on fusion of heavy nuclei in the dinuclear model ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?