Rapid Assessment of Squatting Report (NOTE: LARGE FILE)
Rapid Assessment of Squatting Report (NOTE: LARGE FILE)
Rapid Assessment of Squatting Report (NOTE: LARGE FILE)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PREVIOUS RESEARCH ON SQUATTING IN JAMAICA<br />
<strong>Squatting</strong> is a dynamic phenomenon and no one (1) study done in a particular time can satisfy all<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> reliability after a year or two (2) <strong>of</strong> the study being carried out. This means that the<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> squatting should be an ongoing exercise and the responsibility <strong>of</strong> a particular<br />
body. Lee, McHardy and K’nIfe (2007) identified a list <strong>of</strong> studies conducted on squatting in<br />
Jamaica since 1990. This list is represented in Appendix II, however only two (2) <strong>of</strong> the more<br />
recent studies will be highlighted in this section: Towards a policy and plan for managing<br />
squatting in Jamaica; and the 2004 National Squatter Survey.<br />
Towards a Policy and Plan for Managing <strong>Squatting</strong> in Jamaica (2007)<br />
A ‘Stock-taking’ Study was undertaken in 2007 by a combined team <strong>of</strong> local and international<br />
consultants contracted by the World Bank/Cities Alliance in joint support <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong><br />
Jamaica’s effort to develop a National Policy on <strong>Squatting</strong>. The ‘Stock Taking’ Study entitled<br />
‘Towards a Policy and Plan for Managing <strong>Squatting</strong> in Jamaica’ was undertaken in response to<br />
the perceived absence <strong>of</strong> firm knowledge about squatters and how squatting may be managed<br />
and countered. It was undertaken as the first part <strong>of</strong> a proposed four-stage process (see<br />
Appendix III) for policy and programme development and implementation.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the conclusions arrived at in the ‘Stock Taking’ Study is that there is little concrete<br />
information about the extent or nature <strong>of</strong> squatting in Jamaica. The study went on to state that<br />
without knowledge <strong>of</strong> the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the phenomenon, its growth and the potential for<br />
upgrading the settlements, it would not be possible to develop a policy to manage the existing<br />
settlements in a sustainable manner. One (1) <strong>of</strong> the specific recommendations coming out <strong>of</strong> this<br />
study was for a series <strong>of</strong> analytical studies that must precede the drafting <strong>of</strong> a policy. These high<br />
priority studies comprise an assessment <strong>of</strong> squatting, legal and physical options for managing<br />
squatter settlements, an analysis <strong>of</strong> land markets in Greater Kingston, Montego Bay and two<br />
smaller urban centres, an analysis <strong>of</strong> the needs for new housing by different income groups and<br />
collection <strong>of</strong> the baseline data for this, and studies on housing finance directed to determining<br />
alternative methods <strong>of</strong> providing financing to lower income households.<br />
19