Rapid Assessment of Squatting Report (NOTE: LARGE FILE)
Rapid Assessment of Squatting Report (NOTE: LARGE FILE)
Rapid Assessment of Squatting Report (NOTE: LARGE FILE)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Data Collection<br />
Primary Data Collection<br />
Field data was collected with a survey instrument (see Appendix1) designed to gather<br />
information pertinent to the specific objectives <strong>of</strong> the study. The questionnaire consisted <strong>of</strong><br />
twenty-five (25) (mostly closed-ended) items. One (1) questionnaire was intended for each<br />
squatter settlement surveyed and more than half <strong>of</strong> the items could be answered through<br />
observation.<br />
The administration <strong>of</strong> the questionnaire was undertaken by the field <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> the various land<br />
related Agencies who had good knowledge <strong>of</strong> the location and dynamics <strong>of</strong> the squatter sites.<br />
Where students were employed to assist, they were accompanied by a field <strong>of</strong>ficer who operated<br />
as a guide and resource person (see list <strong>of</strong> contributing Government entities in Appendix 9).<br />
Given the project schedule, the period for fieldwork was limited to three (3) months. At the end<br />
<strong>of</strong> the period, three hundred and twenty (320) questionnaires were distributed and completed.<br />
The data was entered into the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
programme (Version 16.0). Various frequencies and cross tabulations were performed on the<br />
data.<br />
Secondary Data<br />
The National Squatter Survey <strong>of</strong> Jamaica (2004) was used as baseline information and a<br />
reference point for various aspects <strong>of</strong> this study. Since its establishment in 2006, the Squatter<br />
Management Unit (SMU) with the support <strong>of</strong> the Social Development Commission (SDC) and<br />
the Parish Councils embarked on an exercise to verify and update the list <strong>of</strong> six hundred and<br />
thirty-five (635) squatter settlements recorded in the survey. This list along with any additional<br />
settlements identified during the primary data collection phase represents the updated listing <strong>of</strong><br />
squatter settlements in this report.<br />
Other relevant information on squatting gathered from collaborating government agencies by the<br />
Unit was also utilized. Even though GIS analysis was dealt with as a separate method, it must be<br />
appreciated that the datasets utilized in the various applications can be considered secondary<br />
data.<br />
16