01.07.2013 Views

application of alternative food-preservation - Bentham Science

application of alternative food-preservation - Bentham Science

application of alternative food-preservation - Bentham Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Application <strong>of</strong> Alternative Food-Preservation Technologies to Enhance Food Safety & Stability, 2010, 161-187 161<br />

Antonio Bevilacqua, Maria Rosaria Corbo and Milena Sinigaglia (Eds)<br />

All rights reserved - © 2010 <strong>Bentham</strong> <strong>Science</strong> Publishers Ltd.<br />

CHAPTER 10<br />

Food Shelf Life and Safety: Challenge Tests, Prediction and Mathematical<br />

Tools<br />

Antonio Bevilacqua* and Milena Sinigaglia<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Food <strong>Science</strong>, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>Science</strong>, University <strong>of</strong> Foggia, Italy<br />

Abstract: Predictive microbiology (PM) is an interesting tool to predict the survival/growth <strong>of</strong> pathogens and<br />

spoiling microorganisms in <strong>food</strong>s, as well as a powerful mean for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the shelf life and the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> some hurdles in <strong>food</strong> industry. This chapter <strong>of</strong>fers an overview <strong>of</strong> the most important primary<br />

models to fit growth (Baranyi, Gompertz and lag-exponential equations) or survival kinetics (the function <strong>of</strong><br />

Bigelow, along with the equations included in the Add-in-Excel component GInaFiT).<br />

Then, the chapter describes some secondary models used in <strong>food</strong> microbiology (square root, cardinal,<br />

Arrhenius and polynomial equations), as well as a brief synopsis <strong>of</strong> a new approach, the S/P model, based on<br />

the simultaneous evaluation <strong>of</strong> the micr<strong>of</strong>lora growth and the production <strong>of</strong> an end-product or the<br />

consumption <strong>of</strong> a substrate.<br />

Another interesting tool proposed by the chapter is a summary <strong>of</strong> the approaches used for the evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

the lag phase <strong>of</strong> a microbial population, along with an appendix reporting some key-concepts <strong>of</strong> the Design <strong>of</strong><br />

Experiments and a description <strong>of</strong> the indices for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the goodness <strong>of</strong> fitting <strong>of</strong> a function.<br />

Key-concepts: Challenge tests, Primary model (Gompertz, Baranyi and lag-exponential equations), Inactivation<br />

curves, Secondary models, Growth/no growth model, Design <strong>of</strong> experiments.<br />

PREDICTIVE MICROBIOLOGY: AN INTRODUCTION<br />

Many authors cite the papers <strong>of</strong> Bigelow [1, 2] as the date <strong>of</strong> birth <strong>of</strong> predictive microbiology (PM) and the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> this kind <strong>of</strong> approach to predict pathogen growth and/or survival in <strong>food</strong> industry, especially<br />

in canning industry [3, 4]. For the next 30-40 years PM remained quiescent, due to the lack <strong>of</strong> tools to use<br />

practically the concepts <strong>of</strong> microbial modeling in <strong>food</strong> industry; this impasse was overcome in 1970s-1980s and<br />

a renaissance <strong>of</strong> PM started, due to the development and diffusion <strong>of</strong> electronic technologies, which enabled<br />

continual monitoring <strong>of</strong> time and temperature throughout <strong>food</strong> chain and made easier to solve mathematical<br />

equations quickly [4].<br />

In 1983 Roberts and Jarvis published the first review in the field <strong>of</strong> PM and coined the term “predictive<br />

microbiology”, as an interesting tool to predict pathogen survival and growth in <strong>food</strong>.<br />

Since the 1980s PM has been dominated by the dichotomy between the use <strong>of</strong> kinetic equations and probability<br />

models to predict the probability <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> Clostridium botulinum and other toxinogenic microorganisms in<br />

<strong>food</strong>; this dichotomy has resulted in the definition by Bridson and Gould [5] <strong>of</strong> two branches: the classical<br />

microbiology, opposed to the quantal microbiology, where uncertainty dominates [3].<br />

Devlieghere et al. [6] reported a brief synopsis <strong>of</strong> the basic concepts <strong>of</strong> PM and elucidated some parameters to<br />

classify models for microbial growth:<br />

1. the approach (empirical versus mechanistic).<br />

2. the level (primary, secondary or tertiary models)<br />

3. kind <strong>of</strong> inactivation (thermal and non-thermal inactivation).<br />

Regarding the kind <strong>of</strong> approach, empirical models are not based on theoretical assumptions; they are built on<br />

the basis <strong>of</strong> the data <strong>of</strong> a challenge test and cannot be extended to other situations. Examples <strong>of</strong> empirical models<br />

are the Arrhenius and the polynomial equations.<br />

*Address correspondence to this author Antonio Bevilacqua at: Department <strong>of</strong> Food <strong>Science</strong>, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Agricultural <strong>Science</strong>, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Foggia, Italy; E-mail: a.bevilacqua@unifg.it

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!