journal of linguistic studies

More documents

Recommendations

Info

a) majority of computers run operating systems written in English; b) in most of the cases the only working language of places which actively participate in computer “race” is English; c) situation in IT sector is rapidly changing, that Montenegrin cannot keep up to the pace; d) words from the register are quickly appearing and disappearing which makes it harder to enforce processes of primary or secondary adaptation. As a result, it is much more linguistically “economical” to use model words, i.e. direct Anglicisms. We think Montenegrin has a potential to meet linguistic demands of the 21 st century. These demands will become increasingly prominent as Montenegrin fully opens its gates on its way to EU accession. We have to use this potential and keep the particularities of our language also, our language has to change – evolve, and it is up to us to direct these changes into positive and acceptable direction. But, whatever happens, one thing is for certain. There will always be two sides related to this linguistic issue. On one side, numerous linguists consider changes and external influences as an inevitable process. On the other side, some linguists will try to conserve situation and implement purism whenever possible, due to the fact, as they hold, linguistic changes are bad since they “dilute” language. We will place ourselves into the first category since we believe that in order to stop linguistic changes; we would have to stop all other social and cultural changes, which is not the goal of societies which strive to develop. REFERENCES Аfanasieva, О., Аntrushina, G. B. & Моrozova, N. N. (1999). English Lexicology. Моscow: Publishing House “Дрофа”. Ajduković, J. (2004). Uvod u leksičku kontaktologiju – teorija adaptacije rusizama. [Introduction to Lexical Contactology – Theory of Russian loanwords adaptation]. Beograd: Foto Futura. Bugarski, R. (2003). Žargon. [Jargon]. Beograd: Čigoja štampa. Bugarski, R. (1975). Lingvistika o čoveku. [Linguistics on a man]. Beograd: Čigoja štampa. Bugarski, R. (1996). Jezik i lingvistika. [Language and Linguistics], Beograd: Čigoja štampa. Dragićević, R. (2007). Leksikologija srpskog jezika. [Lexicology of the Serbian Language]. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva. Filipović, R. (1986). Teorija jezika u kontaktu. Uvod u lingvistiku jezičnih dodira. [Theory of languages in contact. Introduction into Linguistics of language contacts]. Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, Zagreb: Školska knjiga. Filipović, R. (1990). Anglicizmi u hrvatskom ili srpskom jeziku: Porijeklo - Razvoj – Značenje. [Anglicisms in the Croatian or the Serbian Language: Origin – Devlopment - Meaning]. Zagreb, Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti: Školska knjiga. 336-340. Grčević, M. (2002). O hrvatskim jezičnim promjenama devedesetih godina. [On Croatian linguistics changes during the 1990s]. Forum 41: 514-552. Grickat, I. (1983). Naš standardni jezik kao pratilac opštih oblika kulture. [Our standard language as a mirror of general culture forms]. Zbornik za filologiju i lingvistiku, XXVI, 2: 8-11. 22
Hajmz, D. (1980). Etnografija komunikacije. [Ethnography of communication]. Beograd: Beogradski izdavačko-grafički zavod. Hansen, B. (1982). Englische Lexikologie. [English Lexicology]. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie. Ivić, M. (1978). Pravci u lingvistici. [Directions in Linguistics]. Ljubljana: Državna založba Slovenije. Jutronić-Tihomirović, D. (1980). Sociolingvistika. [Sociolinguistics]. Argumenti VIII . 4. Kasirer, E. (1985). Jezik, Filozofija simboličkih oblika. [Language, Philosophy of symbolic shapes]. Novi Sad: Dnevnik. Katić, M. (2003). Anglicizmi u jeziku tehnike. [Anglicisms in within the language of technique]. XLVII Konferencija ETRAN, Herceg Novi, CD-ROM i knjiga. 241-244. Katić, M. (2001). O tehnikama prevođenja nekih engleskih termina energetske elektronike. [On translation techniques of some of the terms from Energetic Electronics]. 11 th International Symposium on Power Electronics, Novi Sad. 154-157. Klajn, I. (1967). Strana reč – šta je to? [Foreign word – what is that?]. Zbornik za filologiju i lingvistiku X: 7–24. Lalić, G., Panić, O. & Prćić, T. (2005). Generički nazivi elektronskih uređaja u nekim evropskim jezicima: uporedna analiza adaptacije engleskih uzora. [Generic names of electronic devices in some European languages: contrastive analysis of English model words adaptation]. Philologia 3: 19-25. Melvinger, J. (1984). Leksikologija. [Lexicology]. Osijek: Pedagoški fakultet sveučilišta u Osijeku. Menac, A. (1997). Morfološka adaptacija anglicizama u hrvatskom i ruskom jeziku. [Morphological adaptation of anglicisms in the Croatian and Russian Language]. Prvi hrvatski slavistički kongres. Zbornik radova 1: 303–312. Menac, A., R. Filipović. (1997). Adaptacija ortografije anglicizama u hrvatskom i ruskom jeziku: teorija i primjena. [Orthogrphic adaptation of anglicisms in the Croatian and Russian Language: theory and application]. Suvremena lingvistika. year 23. issue 1–2 (number 43–44). 61–71. Mihaljević, M. (2002). Funkcionalni stilovi hrvatskoga (standardnog) jezika s posebnim obzirom na znanstveno-popularni i personalni podstil. [Functional styles of the Croatian (standardised) langauge with special regard to scientific-popular and personal substyle]. Rasprave Instituta za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje 28. 325-343. Milić, M. (2004). Termini igara loptom u engleskom jeziku i njihovi prevodni ekvivalentiu srpskom. [Terms related to ball games in the English language and their translation equivalents in Serbian]. Unpublished master’s thesis. Novi Sad. Filozofski fakultet. Muhvić-Dimanovski, V. (1992). Prevedenice – jedan oblik neologizama. [Translated words – a form of neologisms]. Rad HAZU 446. 205. Muhvić-Dimanovski, V. (2000). Neologizmi na razmeđi jezične otvorenosti i jezičnoga purizma. [Neologisms between language openness and language purism]. Filologija 4. 495 – 499. Muhvić-Dimanovski, V. (2002). New Concepts and New Words; How Do Languages Cope with the Problem of Neology. Collegium Antropologicum, vol. 28. 139 –146. Panić-Kavgić, O. (2006). Koliko razumemo nove anglicizme. [How much do we understand new Anglicisms]. Novi Sad: Zmaj. Pešikan, M. (1970). Leksičko blago našeg jezika i normativni odnos prema njemu. [Lexical wealth of our language and normative relation towards it]. Naš jezik XVIII: 80-92. 23
Page 1: JOURNAL OF LINGUISTIC STUDIES 1
Page 4 and 5: EDITORIAL BOARD EDITOR Assist. Prof
Page 7: FOREWORD The sixth issue of the Jou
Page 10 and 11: 3. RESULTATS Les verbes introducteu
Page 12 and 13: « J'ai soif, oh! j'ai soif! grogna
Page 14 and 15: « Je l’ai cru, admet Morpion [
Page 16 and 17: REFERENCES Actualités en Afrique.
Page 18 and 19: …it is a little disappointing to
Page 20 and 21: 29.28% 5.82% 20 64.89% Figure 1. Di
Page 24 and 25: Pešikan, M. (1970). Naš književn
Page 26 and 27: apply in the case of text as in the
Page 28 and 29: 9. DISCUSSION In the previous secti
Page 30 and 31: factors. Stoichiţoiu (2001) claims
Page 32 and 33: - bodyguard / badigard (DOOM 2005):
Page 34 and 35: CONCLUSION The insufficient degree
Page 36 and 37: especially treated as errors to cor
Page 38 and 39: introduce the target language cultu
Page 40 and 41: REFERENCES Birdsong, D. (2006). Age
Page 42 and 43: Studiums zu verschwinden. Diese Ten
Page 44 and 45: Wenn von Internalisierung der Facht
Page 46 and 47: Crnić-Grotić: Besonderheiten des
Page 48 and 49: dreidimensional» genannt, weil die
Page 50 and 51: Kommunikativen Ansatzes zur Vermitt
Page 52 and 53: judges. English for lawyers was stu
Page 54 and 55: merely an opportunity to discuss an
Page 56 and 57: Hall, D. & Hewings, A. (2000). Inno
Page 58 and 59: sociolinguistic character, they lar
Page 60 and 61: which actually have nothing in comm
Page 62 and 63: …We have also boosted the growth
Page 64 and 65: 4. Kuna, Branko: Nove pojave u jezi
Page 66 and 67: horizons. The student should be enc
Page 68 and 69: consuming. As stated above, the tea
Page 70 and 71: 2. MATERIAL AND METHODS The analysi
Page 72 and 73:
interview (except while closing the
Page 74 and 75:
(CBS, 60 Minutes, IR: Scott Pelley,
Page 76 and 77:
context is precisely defined at the
Page 78 and 79:
whereas its realisation in the Amer
Page 80 and 81:
egularities in the organisation of
Page 82 and 83:
(2) While historical sociology (HS)
Page 84 and 85:
expressed in the forms of first per
Page 86 and 87:
(22) This article is the first in-d
Page 88 and 89:
Further research could be carried o
Page 90 and 91:
THE WORDLISTS PROJECT: AN EXAMPLE O
Page 93 and 94:
CONTRIBUTORS’ BIO DATA Azamat AKB
Page 95:
Jasna VUJCIĆ has an MA in Linguist
show all

journal of linguistic studies

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?