30.06.2013 Views

Mental Health Nursing

Mental Health Nursing

Mental Health Nursing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

38 Acute <strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong><br />

A glossary provides information on each of the items and examples of<br />

current ‘health’ status for each of the points on the severity scale.<br />

The 12 HoNOS items<br />

1. Overactive, aggressive, disruptive or agitated behaviour.<br />

2. Non-accidental self-injury.<br />

3. Problem drinking or drug-taking.<br />

4. Cognitive problems.<br />

5. Physical illness or disability problems.<br />

6. Problems associated with hallucinations and delusions.<br />

7. Problems with depressed mood.<br />

8. Other mental and behavioural problems.<br />

9. Problems with relationships.<br />

10. Problems with activities of daily living.<br />

11. Problems with living conditions.<br />

12. Problems with occupation and activities.<br />

Since HoNOS contains 12 items which are each scored from 0 to 4 on the<br />

severity scale, the range of total scores is 0 to 48. As well as the individual<br />

item and total scores, the scale provides four sub-scales.<br />

Section A – Behavioural problems (3 items).<br />

Section B – Impairment problems (2 items).<br />

Section C – Symptomatic problems (4 items).<br />

Section D – Social problems (4 items).<br />

Because the sub-scales are made up of different numbers of item scores,<br />

the sub-scale ranges are not all the same.<br />

Uses of HoNOS in an in-patient setting<br />

HoNOS provides a simple and easy-to-use tool for the measurement of<br />

outcome within an acute in-patient setting. It is usual for HoNOS ratings<br />

to be carried out shortly after admission and again just prior to discharge.<br />

On each of these occasions, the rating is based on the problems experienced<br />

by that individual during the previous two weeks, the difference<br />

between the two ratings at admission and discharge thus forming the measure<br />

of outcome.<br />

This model of using the tool does work on the presumption that the<br />

individuals’ period of in-patient treatment is reasonably short. Where<br />

individuals remain in-patients for significant periods of time it would be<br />

beneficial to undertake intermediate ratings during the stay to assess the<br />

ongoing outcome and provide a measurement of trends for that individual

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!