30.06.2013 Views

Mental Health Nursing

Mental Health Nursing

Mental Health Nursing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

36. 11 point assessment<br />

completed<br />

By Day 49<br />

37. Substance use<br />

screening assessment<br />

and initial summary<br />

report completed<br />

Integrated care pathways: the ‘acute’ context 129<br />

../../..<br />

../../..<br />

o LATE<br />

o NOT DONE<br />

o LATE<br />

o NOT DONE<br />

o N/A<br />

<strong>Mental</strong> health care pathways in the UK<br />

<strong>Health</strong> care providers in the UK are showing increasing interest in the<br />

claimed benefits of care pathways. In 1998 the National Pathways Association<br />

in the UK had 452 recorded pathways under research, pilot, implementation<br />

or evaluation. Eighteen of these pathways had a mental health<br />

focus. The current status of care pathway development is indicated by the<br />

National Electronic Library for <strong>Health</strong> care pathway database. The database<br />

shows a significant growth in the use of pathways in all specialisms,<br />

with in excess of 25 mental health care organisations registering their integrated<br />

care pathway developments.<br />

Reviewing the literature corroborates the slow but growing use of mental<br />

health care pathways in the UK (Jones, 1997, 1999). Care pathways<br />

have been used for a range of mental health-related diagnoses in the US.<br />

There are predominant accounts of the use of care pathways for patients<br />

with schizophrenia (Anders et al., 1997; Jones and Kamath, 1998). Published<br />

accounts of mental health pathway development in the UK have focused<br />

upon schizophrenia (Jones, 1999, 2000) and dementia (Hall, 2000, 2001).<br />

One multi-professional team described their perceptions of a dementia<br />

assessment care pathway pilot.<br />

• Team members corroborated many benefits of pathways expressed in<br />

the literature; i.e., increased efficiency, role clarification, evidence-based<br />

practice, professionalism, improved teamworking, enhanced communication,<br />

easier access to information.<br />

• The effectiveness of the pathway was viewed as dependent upon a<br />

number of variables – the team, the patient group and available resources.<br />

For example, when equipment or particular specialists were not available,<br />

care was no further enhanced. The pathway merely indicated the<br />

deficiency and during the period of the pilot the pathway did not effect<br />

any improvement when such problems occurred.<br />

• Recording and examining variances had proved to be stressful and frustrating<br />

for individuals. Not accustomed to making known limitations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!