Mental Health Nursing
Mental Health Nursing
Mental Health Nursing
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
36. 11 point assessment<br />
completed<br />
By Day 49<br />
37. Substance use<br />
screening assessment<br />
and initial summary<br />
report completed<br />
Integrated care pathways: the ‘acute’ context 129<br />
../../..<br />
../../..<br />
o LATE<br />
o NOT DONE<br />
o LATE<br />
o NOT DONE<br />
o N/A<br />
<strong>Mental</strong> health care pathways in the UK<br />
<strong>Health</strong> care providers in the UK are showing increasing interest in the<br />
claimed benefits of care pathways. In 1998 the National Pathways Association<br />
in the UK had 452 recorded pathways under research, pilot, implementation<br />
or evaluation. Eighteen of these pathways had a mental health<br />
focus. The current status of care pathway development is indicated by the<br />
National Electronic Library for <strong>Health</strong> care pathway database. The database<br />
shows a significant growth in the use of pathways in all specialisms,<br />
with in excess of 25 mental health care organisations registering their integrated<br />
care pathway developments.<br />
Reviewing the literature corroborates the slow but growing use of mental<br />
health care pathways in the UK (Jones, 1997, 1999). Care pathways<br />
have been used for a range of mental health-related diagnoses in the US.<br />
There are predominant accounts of the use of care pathways for patients<br />
with schizophrenia (Anders et al., 1997; Jones and Kamath, 1998). Published<br />
accounts of mental health pathway development in the UK have focused<br />
upon schizophrenia (Jones, 1999, 2000) and dementia (Hall, 2000, 2001).<br />
One multi-professional team described their perceptions of a dementia<br />
assessment care pathway pilot.<br />
• Team members corroborated many benefits of pathways expressed in<br />
the literature; i.e., increased efficiency, role clarification, evidence-based<br />
practice, professionalism, improved teamworking, enhanced communication,<br />
easier access to information.<br />
• The effectiveness of the pathway was viewed as dependent upon a<br />
number of variables – the team, the patient group and available resources.<br />
For example, when equipment or particular specialists were not available,<br />
care was no further enhanced. The pathway merely indicated the<br />
deficiency and during the period of the pilot the pathway did not effect<br />
any improvement when such problems occurred.<br />
• Recording and examining variances had proved to be stressful and frustrating<br />
for individuals. Not accustomed to making known limitations