30.06.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Project Planning for CIPable Facility 25<br />

cycle consists of aprerinse, an alkaline wash, apost-rinse, and acid wash (or rinse),<br />

another post-rinse, and afinal rinse to minimum required resistivity of the water<br />

going to waste at the end of the circuit. The circuit will normally be evacuated and<br />

refilled at least four times, following the alkaline wash, the acid wash or rinse, the<br />

last post-rinse, and on completion of the final rinse. The water required to“fill” the<br />

CIP S/R piping, and create aminimum puddle in the vessel being cleaned becomes<br />

greater as the distance between the CIP skid and the vessel increases. The first cost<br />

for asecond CIP skid may be recovered quickly by reduced water cost for daily<br />

operation when the S/R piping contains significantly more water than the piping<br />

actually being cleaned.<br />

Scheduling<br />

Scheduling criteria must address not only the number of circuits, but also the<br />

frequency of cleaning. Consider, for example,<br />

& How many lots are made on adaily basis?<br />

& How many batch operations and transfers will be made daily?<br />

& How many product changeovers occur in agiven period of operation?<br />

& How available are cleaning utilities, especially water?<br />

A major consideration involves the philosophy of CIP to be applied.<br />

Alternatives include:<br />

& Maximum flexibility, and the ability to clean any vessel, or any transfer line or<br />

other equipment item, individually, following each period of use<br />

& Recognition that each vessel isused for abatch process associated with a<br />

subsequent transfer operation. Creative engineering design can makeitpossible<br />

to clean the vessel and all associated piping and downstream equipment involved<br />

in the transfer in asingle circuit, thus reducing the number of circuits by a<br />

factor of as much as three, comparedtothe moreconservative, flexible approach.<br />

The writer recommends consideration of computer simulation of the chosen<br />

method as the means of reaching afinal decision. Computer simulation can provide<br />

design data on which to base the decisions about the number of CIP systems<br />

required,the total time each will operate during a24-hour day,the amount of water<br />

required, and waste to be generated, and the estimated chemical utilization.<br />

Consider also that CIP skids and associated CIP S/R piping used at areasonable<br />

level of activity are less subject to developing contamination during long periods of<br />

nonuse. It is also not advisable to design for aCIP system usage of above 70% to 80%<br />

on average (Fig. 2).<br />

Redundancy<br />

Astate-of-the-art CIP skid is acomplex assembly of equally complex components<br />

which will occasionally fail, and require maintenance and the subsequent testing and<br />

documentation. Downtime considerations are essential, especially if multiple<br />

process areas are dependent on asingle CIP skid. Redundancy can be achieved<br />

by two CIP skids, by routing CIP S/R lines through mix-proof valve arrays or<br />

transfer panels.<br />

Careful consideration of segregation, scheduling, and redundancy needs,<br />

during the conceptual design phase, will enable the design team to define the<br />

system needs. Recognition of the value of the CIP system as a“start-up tool” is also

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!