30.06.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Commissioning and Qualification 345<br />

occurred throughout the functional testing, reagent times were simply tweaked. At<br />

one point late in the functional testing, make-up failures started to occur in some<br />

circuits. With little or no accumulated data, the problems were difficult<br />

to troubleshoot.<br />

Arequest was made for help to troubleshoot the problem. Historian data was<br />

first accumulated in aspreadsheet for all previous functional testing (and reagent<br />

pump testing) runs for both alkaline and acid. Average fill volumes were calculated<br />

for circuits based on the alkaline concentrations achieved and the alkaline addition<br />

times. Calculations were then done to determine what the acid reagent addition<br />

times should be. Inconsistencies were found. It was possible to correlate and<br />

attribute the inconsistencies to adjustments made in the acid pumps. It was also<br />

possible to determine the acid conductivity probe for one of the CIP skids<br />

was failing.<br />

Fix Hardware Mistakes<br />

It is very tempting during functional testing to compensate for hardware deficiencies<br />

by developing software workarounds. Trying to outsmart the hardware can<br />

even be very satisfying. This may not cause great difficulties for very simple<br />

systems. However, for complex systems, especially where multiple workarounds<br />

are performed, these patches make the software far more complex and may<br />

ultimately prevent you from having the system operate the way you want.<br />

Early in Project A, aproblem was discovered with the type of flowmeter used<br />

on the CIP skid. If the flow was ever blocked while the pump was running, the<br />

flowmeter did not read “zero.” Instead it actually spiked up to avalue close to its<br />

upper calibrated range value. The flowmeter could have been replaced with amore<br />

suitable flowmeter; however, workarounds were implemented instead. These<br />

workarounds got very complex during Project A. It has not been quite as<br />

complicated for Project B, but the following problems remain:<br />

1. Sequences have to be designed without ever blocking flow, otherwise total<br />

volumes will be way off.<br />

2. The control valve output was limited to a15% minimum to avoid problems<br />

with the flow control loop.<br />

3. Low flow alarms are not useful for detecting closed manual valves or other<br />

setup problem.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Complex CIP systems can be the most challenging commissioning task in you<br />

project. Planning the commissioning can be made easier by understanding the<br />

design and design basis, identifying all necessary activities and planning them in<br />

the appropriate order. Using sound scientific principles in your execution will pay<br />

great dividends in reduced commissioning time and robustness of CIP operations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!