30.06.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Waste Treatment for the CIP System 325<br />

From this tank, they are metered in with the plant effluent so that large surges<br />

of concentrated BOD waste streams are not sent to the receiving POTW at<br />

one time.<br />

SEGREGATING AND TREATING THE VIABLE ORGANISMS<br />

When a CIP system is used to clean equipment and piping that has been<br />

exposed to living cells, the effluent may need to be inactivated using a<br />

specialized waste treatment system before it is sent to waste neutralization for<br />

pH treatment. These biowaste systems are sometimes referred to as “kill<br />

systems.” They use heat or chemicals to kill the active cell cultures in either<br />

batch mode or continuous mode.<br />

Steam heat is the preferred method of inactivating any viable organisms in the<br />

waste stream. The goal of 6-log reduction in the number of microorganisms is easily<br />

obtainable using steam directly injected into the waste stream or using aheat<br />

exchanger. Most designers use direct steam because of its heating efficiency as well<br />

as it being less likely to foul from the waste stream getting “baked on.” The steam<br />

injector is well suited for both the batch systems as well as the continuous flow<br />

systems (Fig. 7).<br />

Acontinuous biowaste inactivation system will include, but not be limited to,<br />

the following components:<br />

& Steam eductor(s) for direct steam heating<br />

& Receiver tanks for both biowaste and high BOD waste streams<br />

& Heat recovery exchanger on discharge line<br />

& Additional cooler for reducing discharge temperature<br />

How does biowaste inactivation affect the CIP system designer? First, the<br />

designer needs to be aware of the need to treat the CIP waste streams that<br />

potentially contain viable organisms from the process. Then system drains at the skid<br />

and each low point will need to be grouped so that they can be sent in the<br />

dedicated biowaste drain system to the inactivation system. In large CIP<br />

systems, it may be beneficial to install a divert valve on the common drain<br />

of the CIP skid that sends the pre-rinse and caustic wash, which will carry the<br />

biological material to the biowaste system and then diverts the remaining cycles<br />

directly to the pH neutralization system. The divert valve is an inexpensive way<br />

to save money on the energy required to heat alarge quantity of biowaste. If a<br />

batch system is used for inactivation, a divert valve can save a significant<br />

amount of the capital cost for larger equipment.<br />

CONCLUSION: IN THE FUTURE, HOW MIGHT CIP SYSTEMS BE<br />

IMPROVED WITH RESPECT TO WASTE TREATMENT?<br />

The design features that improve aCIP system’s ability to efficiently clean acircuit<br />

with less water and chemicals will also reduce the waste effluent load from each CIP<br />

circuit. Minimizing the amount of water used is the first step in reducing the waste<br />

volume that afacility sends to the POTW. The reduced volume of water directly<br />

corresponds to areduced chemical and heat load from each circuit. As phosphate<br />

discharge becomes morerestricted in the United States and aroundthe world, other<br />

cleaners with little or no phosphates should be chosen early in the process cleaning

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!