30.06.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

248<br />

Seiberling<br />

CIP and to drain for SIP,permitting the pulsing of CIP fluids through all valves and<br />

traps fromthe beginning to the end of the CIP program. In most applications, the flow<br />

required to supply the sprays will requireapressuresufficient to permit sequencing<br />

through the media, additive, gas, and exhaust lines, and sample valve in parallel with<br />

the sprays, and still maintain aviable flow through the sprays, at, of course, reduced<br />

pressure. Figure 11 suggests atotal of nine paths including vessel sprays (1), media<br />

line (2), additive lines (3) by installation of aCIP jumper as three in parallel, gas lines<br />

(4–6), exhaust line (7), sample valve (8), and the steam line to harvest valve (9). Paths 2<br />

to 8all include automatic valves through traps to acondensate (COND)/CIPR<br />

header, and these valves would be “pulsed,” i.e., opened for only two to three<br />

seconds when flow was through the associated leg.<br />

The design objectives should be to achieve high velocity flow through each leg<br />

individually for sufficient time to replace all fluid in the leg, and “pulse” CIP fluids<br />

through the traps which would otherwise be deadlegs, recovering this solution<br />

during the chemical wash phases via the COND/CIPR header. A repetitive<br />

sequence of 60 to 90 seconds that first provides flow through each individual leg<br />

in parallel with the sprays, and then full flow through the sprays for 30 to 45<br />

seconds has provided excellent results. The number of times through the sequence<br />

during each program phase will vary with vessel and line size and line length. The<br />

author’s experience on multiple projects involving perhaps 60 vessels varying in<br />

size fromseed reactors of 100 Lcleaned at 40 gpm (150 Lpm) to production reactors<br />

of 15 kL cleaned at 100 gpm (380 Lpm) has confirmed the efficacy of this method.<br />

Leg diameters have ranged from 0.5 (12 mm) to 2in. (50 mm) and more.<br />

Though not fully illustrated in Figure 11, the media line to this bioreactor in<br />

the actual application was cleaned separately from the vessel and legs via CIPS at<br />

FIGURE 12 This photograph shows two small bioreactors depicted schematically inFigure 11<br />

connected to acommon transfer panel for harvest/CIP flow selection.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!