30.06.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

236<br />

Flexible Tubing, Transfer Panels, or Automated Valves<br />

Flexible tubing provides the maximum flexibility for making process and CIP<br />

connections but lacks ameans of organizing and verifying connections. Flexible<br />

tubing is also less capable of meeting the CIP requirement for drainability.Flex-lines<br />

should be limited to use for temporary connections for liquid ingredient additions,<br />

or final transfer to aportable tank.<br />

U-Bend transfer panels and/or automatically controlled valves are the<br />

preferred components to be used in aCIPable process design for either product<br />

development work or full-scale production.<br />

HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT<br />

Seiberling<br />

Chapter 1 provided historical references to CIP as applied in dairy, brewing,<br />

beverages, and food processing by the mid-1970s. These processes shared a<br />

unique operating requirement in that many large tanks contained product for<br />

extended periods of time, and required connections to piping and process systems<br />

that generally ran less than 14 to 16 hours. Atraditional practice was to clean all<br />

piping after each period of use, and clean vessels whenever they were emptied<br />

(with restriction on maximum period of use). This operating requirement led to the<br />

development of extensive CIP supply/return (CIPS/R) piping systems to facilitate<br />

connections to establish alarge number of CIP circuits.<br />

Chapter 1also defined the typical pharmaceutical/biopharmaceutical process<br />

as being comprised of atrain of vessels, and as the product moved from vessel to<br />

vessel the soiled equipment generally consisted of the empty vessel and aportion of<br />

transfer piping and associated components. Seiberling therefore suggested in 1986<br />

(1) and 1987 (2) the consideration of “Integrated piping system design for product<br />

and CIP solution use.” This concept was further reviewed by Seiberling in 1992 (3)<br />

and Seiberling and Ratz in 1995 (4). The concepts first described in those<br />

publications are the basis of the generic concepts to be described in the remainder<br />

of this chapter. Marks further explained other aspects of the “integrated approach”<br />

in 2001 (5). Chrzanowski, Crissman, and Odum published atreatise on valve<br />

assembly use in 2001 (6) that further explains the means of achieving the functional<br />

capability suggested in some figures of this chapter. The use of CIP transfer panels<br />

as described by Shnayder and Khanina (7) is more typical of the dairy,brewery,and<br />

beverage facility applications from 1960 onwards, but applicable to some product<br />

development facilities that may favor flexibility over automation.<br />

TYPICAL PROCESS APPLICATIONS<br />

AGeneric Process Train with U-Bend Transfer Panels<br />

Figure 1illustrates abasic concept applicable to almost all multi-tank process trains.<br />

The vessels could be variable in volumes, and as many as are required for a<br />

complete process can be organized in this manner. The indicated valves must be<br />

automated to achieve validatable CIP.<br />

Mixproof valves are shown for CIPS only. U-Bend transfer panels are the<br />

suggested method of configuring flow paths for all other process and CIP/SIP<br />

requirements. Whereas the generic process train discussed in Chapter 1used a<br />

single panel at the bottom of the tank, this concept shows high-level and low-level<br />

panels. Apreferred approach for multiple vessels serving acommon function,<br />

i.e., media prep, fermentation, or buffer prep, would combine all upper level

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!