30.06.2013 Views

ดาวน์โหลด All Proceeding - AS Nida

ดาวน์โหลด All Proceeding - AS Nida

ดาวน์โหลด All Proceeding - AS Nida

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

formulate a model of the expected value of a dependent process<br />

variables or responses y in term of the value of an influential process<br />

variable of x’s. In multiple linear regression, the model<br />

∑<br />

=<br />

k<br />

0<br />

i 1<br />

i i<br />

y= β + β x + ε<br />

(1)<br />

is performed, where ε is an unobserved random with mean<br />

zero conditioned on a scalar influential process variables of x’s model.<br />

In this model, for each unit increase in the value of x, the conditional<br />

expectation of y increases by βi units of x i . Conveniently, these<br />

models are all linear from the point of view of estimation, since the<br />

regression model is linear in terms of the unknown parameters βi .<br />

Therefore, for least squares analysis, the computational and inferential<br />

problems of multiple regressions can be completely addressed using the<br />

multiple regression techniques. This is done by treating x, x 2 , ... as<br />

being distinct independent process variables in a multiple regression<br />

model.<br />

In this research, there are five process variables and the<br />

objective is to focus on the only one response of y but there are some<br />

qualitative process variables that need to be in form of integer whereas<br />

the remaining process variables are qualitative. The mixed integer linear<br />

constrained response surface optimization model (MI-LCRSOM) is<br />

then applied to this problem of interest. The detail of sequential<br />

procedure for setting up the optimum value via a relationship of<br />

significant process variables and responses are expressed. Firstly, the 2 k<br />

factorial design was applied to preliminarily study the effects of those<br />

process variables. The multiple regression models of those responses<br />

were then developed from only significant process variables affecting<br />

the response. Finally, the regression model in forms of the path of<br />

steepest descent was placed as the objective function of the linear<br />

constrained response surface optimizations model to meet the<br />

meandering target subject to the limitation from feasible ranges of<br />

significant process variables including the specific integer values for<br />

some process variables.<br />

47<br />

4. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND ANALYSES<br />

In the preliminary study, a two level experimental design<br />

was performed to determine the statistically significant from five<br />

process variables which consist of the scanning height (A), scanning<br />

power # 1 (B), scanning power # 2 (C), beam shape (D) and scanning<br />

speed (E). The feasible ranges, the current operating condition and type<br />

of process variables are provided in Table 2.<br />

Table 2. Process Variables, Feasible Ranges and the Current Operating<br />

Condition.<br />

Process Variable<br />

Feasible Range<br />

Lower Upper<br />

Current Type<br />

A 1 7 4 Qualitative<br />

B 0.12 0.48 0.24 Quantitative<br />

C 0.18 0.72 0.36 Quantitative<br />

D 1 3 1 Qualitative<br />

E 100 300 300 Quantitative<br />

At this step, the objective of using a factorial experimental<br />

design is to analyze both main and interaction effects of all process<br />

variables. The 2 5 experimental designs with two replicates provide 64<br />

treatments. The two level of low and high were selected cover values of<br />

feasible ranges from the actual operating conditions in production line<br />

and the responses were measured from the meandering data average of<br />

each cutting line. By using a general linear model from the analysis of<br />

variance (ANOVA), sources of variation focusing on the main and<br />

interaction effects and their P-values are shown in Table 3. The<br />

significant factor of main effect consist of A, B, C and D as the P-value<br />

is less than or equal to 0.05 and the interaction effect of AB, AC, BC,<br />

BD, CD are also statistically significant at 95% confidence interval.<br />

Table 3. Sources of Variation Focusing on Main and Interaction Effects<br />

and their P-values.<br />

Source of Variation P-value<br />

A 0.000<br />

B 0.000<br />

C 0.000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!