29.06.2013 Views

Review of the Food-borne Zoonoses Research ... - ARCHIVE: Defra

Review of the Food-borne Zoonoses Research ... - ARCHIVE: Defra

Review of the Food-borne Zoonoses Research ... - ARCHIVE: Defra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. O<strong>the</strong>r zoonotic pathogens <strong>of</strong> interest review summary<br />

4.1 Success <strong>of</strong> research in providing value to <strong>Defra</strong><br />

<strong>Defra</strong> has funded research projects on Cryptosporidium, Yersinia and Neospora. Each<br />

project was thought to have improved understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> zoonotic risk from <strong>the</strong>se<br />

pathogens and <strong>the</strong>refore funding in this area has been <strong>of</strong> value to <strong>Defra</strong>.<br />

Studies <strong>of</strong> Cryptosporidium infection confirmed that pets are rarely a source <strong>of</strong> infection<br />

for humans but that some human infections could be attributed to farm animals.<br />

Challenge experiments demonstrated for <strong>the</strong> first time that C. hominis could infect a wide<br />

range <strong>of</strong> farm species, including calves, lambs piglets and poultry. The research on<br />

Neospora did not provide evidence that <strong>the</strong>re is a zoonotic risk from cattle. Yersinia<br />

enterocolitica strains present in livestock were shown to be a potential threat to human<br />

health.<br />

4.2 Issues and areas <strong>of</strong> concern relating to this research<br />

There were no generic issues <strong>of</strong> concern in this research area. The Yersinia research<br />

had generated valuable publications, but it was considered disappointing that more had<br />

not been published from <strong>the</strong> Cryptosporidium work.<br />

4.3 Gaps in research<br />

Although additional work could always be carried out, no significant gaps were identified<br />

in <strong>the</strong> research.<br />

It was felt that <strong>the</strong> research agenda in this area should largely be driven by policy needs.<br />

There was potential for more work on Cryptosporidium sp. and Yersinia sp. There was<br />

not a strong case for <strong>Defra</strong> to fund fur<strong>the</strong>r studies on Neospora sp. but a case could be<br />

made for working in partnership with industry on Neospora as an endemic disease.<br />

Surveillance or prevalence studies would be useful to determine <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong><br />

diseases such as Q fever, toxoplasmosis or Lyme disease in UK livestock. <strong>Research</strong> to<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!