Review of the Food-borne Zoonoses Research ... - ARCHIVE: Defra
Review of the Food-borne Zoonoses Research ... - ARCHIVE: Defra
Review of the Food-borne Zoonoses Research ... - ARCHIVE: Defra
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4. O<strong>the</strong>r zoonotic pathogens <strong>of</strong> interest review summary<br />
4.1 Success <strong>of</strong> research in providing value to <strong>Defra</strong><br />
<strong>Defra</strong> has funded research projects on Cryptosporidium, Yersinia and Neospora. Each<br />
project was thought to have improved understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> zoonotic risk from <strong>the</strong>se<br />
pathogens and <strong>the</strong>refore funding in this area has been <strong>of</strong> value to <strong>Defra</strong>.<br />
Studies <strong>of</strong> Cryptosporidium infection confirmed that pets are rarely a source <strong>of</strong> infection<br />
for humans but that some human infections could be attributed to farm animals.<br />
Challenge experiments demonstrated for <strong>the</strong> first time that C. hominis could infect a wide<br />
range <strong>of</strong> farm species, including calves, lambs piglets and poultry. The research on<br />
Neospora did not provide evidence that <strong>the</strong>re is a zoonotic risk from cattle. Yersinia<br />
enterocolitica strains present in livestock were shown to be a potential threat to human<br />
health.<br />
4.2 Issues and areas <strong>of</strong> concern relating to this research<br />
There were no generic issues <strong>of</strong> concern in this research area. The Yersinia research<br />
had generated valuable publications, but it was considered disappointing that more had<br />
not been published from <strong>the</strong> Cryptosporidium work.<br />
4.3 Gaps in research<br />
Although additional work could always be carried out, no significant gaps were identified<br />
in <strong>the</strong> research.<br />
It was felt that <strong>the</strong> research agenda in this area should largely be driven by policy needs.<br />
There was potential for more work on Cryptosporidium sp. and Yersinia sp. There was<br />
not a strong case for <strong>Defra</strong> to fund fur<strong>the</strong>r studies on Neospora sp. but a case could be<br />
made for working in partnership with industry on Neospora as an endemic disease.<br />
Surveillance or prevalence studies would be useful to determine <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong><br />
diseases such as Q fever, toxoplasmosis or Lyme disease in UK livestock. <strong>Research</strong> to<br />
28