Review of the Food-borne Zoonoses Research ... - ARCHIVE: Defra

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Review of Defra’s FBZ Research Programme, 26 th – 27 th November 2007 ASSESSMENT FORM – EXTERNAL REFEREES PROJECT CODE(S): APPRAISED BY: DATE: The scores and comments you provide will be used for a range of purposes, including (1) to inform Defra personnel (2) for feed back to the project leader(s) and (3) for possible inclusion in the review output document (which will be published on the Defra website). Please note that while a list of the review panel members will be publicly available, with reference to points 2 and 3, the scores and comments provided by each referee will not be directly attributed to them, but rather referee 1, referee 2 etc. However, you should be aware that Departmental correspondence, including peer review processes, fall within the remit of regulations that permit greater access to information, including Freedom of Information, Environmental Information Regulations and the code of practise on access to government information. In the event that peer review information (such as the names of peer reviewers and the comments they made) should become the subject of such a request, the Department will seek to protect the interests of peer reviewers in the light of legal requirements. Instructions: Please assign a score and provide written comments where necessary. Scores should be based on a 1-5 scale, where: 1 = Not at all 2 = Partial 3 = Satisfactory 4 = Good 5 = Very Good 1. Relevance and appropriateness for R&D funding by Defra 2. Soundness and appropriateness of the scientific approaches and methods 3. Appropriateness of the contractors, sub-contractors and collaborators (e.g. personnel and facilities) 4. Rate of progress to date in achieving the aims and objectives of the research 5. Probability of success (if the research is ongoing) 6. Conclusions based on sound evidence 7. Dissemination of findings 8. Quality of science 9. Value for money 10. Overall rating (it is important to provide a score here) 110
11. Overall opinions on the research area (including your overall views, as well as any comments you have on questions 1-10)* 12. Has the research raised further questions that need addressing with Defra R&D funding? YES/NO If yes, please provide details* 13. Are the areas within the current research addressing topics of highest priority? YES/NO If not, which topics would you identify as high?* 14. Please state any questions you wish to be forwarded to the contractor for comment – *Please expand boxes as required 111
Page 2 and 3:
Contents Section A - Introduction..
Page 4 and 5:
Review of the Food-borne Zoonoses (
Page 6 and 7:
Plans for taking forward these prio
Page 8 and 9:
Policy Objectives The key policy ob
Page 10 and 11:
Figure 2. Laboratory reports of Sal
Page 12 and 13:
Figure 4. Laboratory reports of Cam
Page 14 and 15:
6. Aims of the FBZ research review
Page 16 and 17:
Section B - Review Summaries 16
Page 18 and 19:
epidemiology of Salmonella and anti
Page 20 and 21:
There is a need to objectively asse
Page 22 and 23:
2. Campylobacter review summary 2.1
Page 24 and 25:
for this organism. Research within
Page 26 and 27:
3. E. coli review summary 3.1 Succe
Page 28 and 29:
4. Other zoonotic pathogens of inte
Page 30 and 31:
Annex 1 - Projects Reviewed 30
Page 32 and 33:
OZ0311 Conventional versus capillar
Page 34 and 35:
OZ0402 OZ0404 OZ0405 OZ0407 OZ0604
Page 36 and 37:
OZ0704 OZ0705 OZ0706 OZ0707 Quantif
Page 38 and 39:
Annex 2 - Project Abstracts and Pro
Page 40 and 41:
To test the suitability of the AFLP
Page 42 and 43:
Project code: OZ0324 Project title:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Review Summary The knowledge that t
Page 48 and 49:
Review Summary The project was felt
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
It is clear that the EC legislative
Page 54 and 55:
if the vaccines currently available
Page 56 and 57:
Four published papers have come out
Page 58 and 59:
Review Summary This epidemiological
Page 60 and 61: Project code: OZO316 Project title:
Page 62 and 63: Project code: OZ0318 Project title:
Page 64 and 65: agricultural industry/public health
Page 66 and 67: testing laboratories. In addition,
Page 68 and 69: animal pathogen but is a human path
Page 70 and 71: esearch has also substantially impr
Page 72 and 73: to elucidate the antigenic repertoi
Page 74 and 75: and have contributed to our underst
Page 76 and 77: Fundamental issues concerning the f
Page 78 and 79: Review summary Project OZ0606 focus
Page 80 and 81: Abstract of research OZ0608 The ado
Page 82 and 83: thinning process for molecular trac
Page 84 and 85: Project code: LK0665 Project title:
Page 86 and 87: Review summary While poultry meat i
Page 88 and 89: Review summary A key aim of this pr
Page 90 and 91: Review summary This project aimed t
Page 96 and 97: Project code: OZ0138C Project title
Page 102 and 103: Abstract of research Projects OZ070
Page 104 and 105: produced were both relevant and imp
Page 106 and 107: List of External Reviewers. Mr. Pau
Page 108 and 109: Review of Defra’s FBZ Research Pr
Page 112 and 113: Annex 5 - Review Timetable 112
Page 114 and 115: 11.45 - 12.00 Bovine and Porcine Fo
Page 116: Campylobacter Other 11.50 - 12.05 P
show all

Review of the Food-borne Zoonoses Research ... - ARCHIVE: Defra

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?