29.06.2013 Views

History of the Johnstones, 1191-1909, with ... - Electric Scotland

History of the Johnstones, 1191-1909, with ... - Electric Scotland

History of the Johnstones, 1191-1909, with ... - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EDGBASTON HALL 275<br />

<strong>the</strong> vendor might ei<strong>the</strong>r insist on <strong>the</strong> completion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> purchase by <strong>the</strong> last<br />

bidder <strong>with</strong> this penalty, or he might treat <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous bidder, obliging<br />

Galabank to pay for <strong>the</strong> extra expense and loss ; or he might consider <strong>the</strong> lands<br />

unsold, put <strong>the</strong>m up again for sale, and only amerce Galabank for his failure to<br />

complete <strong>the</strong> purchase by <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first auction. The vendor preferred<br />

<strong>the</strong> third course, and, after receiving payment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first auction expenses,<br />

claimed <strong>the</strong> costs and penalties which would have been his due if <strong>the</strong> lands had<br />

been <strong>of</strong>fered again to <strong>the</strong> previous bidder, and also <strong>the</strong> fine for which Galabank<br />

would have been liable if he had completed <strong>the</strong> purchase. The vendor put<br />

<strong>the</strong>m up again at <strong>the</strong> previous price, and, finding it too high, petitioned <strong>the</strong><br />

Lords in Council and Session in Nov. 18 15 to be allowed to lower <strong>the</strong> upset<br />

price and <strong>the</strong>n ;<br />

sold Relief and Burnswark at a reduced price, holding back <strong>the</strong><br />

rest. He brought an action against Galabank and his agent for £3 129, 6s. 2d.<br />

as penalty for not originally completing <strong>the</strong> purchase, and also for £5000 for<br />

damage sustained by <strong>the</strong> Westerhall estate from selling <strong>the</strong> lands at a smaller<br />

price (to a friend), and for any loss that might be sustained in <strong>the</strong> future sale <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> remainder.<br />

The defendant showed that <strong>the</strong> petitioners had deliberately preferred<br />

<strong>the</strong> alternative <strong>of</strong> declaring <strong>the</strong> sale void, and making <strong>the</strong> most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lands by<br />

separating <strong>the</strong>m, but Lord Reston adjudged, Jan. 20, 1818, that <strong>the</strong> defendant,<br />

Dr John Johnstone, domiciled in England, was liable for <strong>the</strong> sum claimed, and<br />

also for any difference between his original <strong>of</strong>fer and <strong>the</strong> price for which<br />

<strong>the</strong> remaining lands may be sold. He again appealed, pointing out that this<br />

decision enabled <strong>the</strong> Westerhall trustees "to carry on a speculation upon<br />

<strong>the</strong>se lands on <strong>the</strong> extraordinary footing that <strong>the</strong>y were to draw <strong>the</strong> benefit<br />

while he had all <strong>the</strong> loss" (June 3, 1818). But <strong>the</strong> Lords, undoubtedly annoyed<br />

at <strong>the</strong> Curtis trustees thinking land in <strong>Scotland</strong> an unsafe investment, upheld <strong>the</strong><br />

previous decision, and John had to pay <strong>the</strong> costs, which, in <strong>the</strong> end, mounted up<br />

to over £1 8,000. The affair was so mortifying that his wife induced him, for <strong>the</strong><br />

recovery <strong>of</strong> his spirits, to take a few months' holiday in London, on <strong>the</strong> pretext<br />

<strong>of</strong> education for <strong>the</strong>ir two daughters, who received music lessons from <strong>the</strong> Abbe<br />

Liszt and drawing lessons from <strong>the</strong> artist, Mulready.<br />

The Curtis trustees were very short-sighted. They preferred an estate in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Vale <strong>of</strong> Evesham, <strong>with</strong> a house, mentioned in Shakespeare as " Haunted<br />

Hilboro'." This was sold by one <strong>of</strong> John's representatives for under £4000<br />

a few years ago (it was valued at ^16,000 in 1868) ; and land in Annandale now<br />

commands a fancy price.<br />

Edward invested his second marriage settlement in <strong>the</strong> estate <strong>of</strong> Dunsley<br />

Manor, near Kinver, and in a farm at Upton Snodsbury, lying in both East and<br />

West Worcestershire. For some years he put a bailiff into Dunsley, and kept<br />

<strong>the</strong> farm <strong>of</strong> several hundred acres in his own hands. Edgbaston Hall 1 was<br />

1 Edgbaston Hall, says Dr Wi<strong>the</strong>ring's biographer, was a spacious and commodious<br />

mansion, surrounded by a park, affording an interesting combination <strong>of</strong> wood, water, and<br />

undulating lawns. "There, launching upon <strong>the</strong> unruffled surface <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lake, he devoted<br />

a summer's evening to angling, whilst <strong>the</strong> swan '<strong>with</strong> arched neck proudly rowed <strong>with</strong> oary<br />

feet,' or, attended by Newfoundland dogs, he would inspect his beautiful herd <strong>of</strong> French

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!