Settlement Agreement - Attorney General - State of California
Settlement Agreement - Attorney General - State of California
Settlement Agreement - Attorney General - State of California
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
e. Where tests (such as certain panels) that are ordered by a<br />
single Test Order Code are billed to Medi-Cal under more than one CPT code, the Reporting<br />
Business Unit will also report an allocation <strong>of</strong> the total applicable Test Bill Code price to each<br />
included CPT code in proportion to Medi-Cal’s then applicable maximum reimbursement rates,<br />
resulting in multiple “Allocated CPT Code Prices” for that Test Bill Code price. Provided that<br />
all <strong>of</strong> the requirements in this Section III.C.5.e are met, and subject to the exceptions in Section<br />
III.K <strong>of</strong> this <strong>Settlement</strong> <strong>Agreement</strong>, <strong>California</strong> will not make any claim against or seek<br />
withholding from a Quest Releasee under Section 51501(a), or seek any discretionary suspension<br />
or exclusion <strong>of</strong> a Quest Releasee under Section 51501(a), on the ground that an Allocated CPT<br />
Code Price that was charged before November 1, 2013 for a test performed on or before that date<br />
was lower than a price that was charged to Medi-Cal, unless the price charged to Medi-Cal was<br />
for a test ordered under the same Test Order Code. The requirements are that:<br />
(i) The same Test Order Codes are <strong>of</strong>fered to the<br />
ordering provider regardless <strong>of</strong> whether or not payment is sought from Medi-Cal, and no attempt<br />
is made to influence the ordering <strong>of</strong> a test in order to avoid comparing charges to Medi-Cal with<br />
charges to other purchasers; and<br />
(ii) the Reporting Business Units have otherwise<br />
complied with the reporting requirements set forth in this <strong>Settlement</strong> <strong>Agreement</strong>.<br />
f. The name, address, telephone number, and e-mail address<br />
<strong>of</strong> a contact at Quest with knowledge <strong>of</strong> the circumstances <strong>of</strong> the relevant laboratory tests.<br />
g. To the extent Quest believes the identity <strong>of</strong> the purchaser<br />
does not reveal them, the facts, if any, upon which Quest contends that it was not required to<br />
charge Medi-Cal at least as low a price as the Lower Price Purchaser (“Justifications”).<br />
<strong>California</strong> agrees that if Quest fails to include a particular Justification, Quest does not waive its<br />
right to assert that Justification at a later point.<br />
6. For insurance companies and other similar commercial third-party<br />
payors whose reimbursement rates are determined in accordance with a contract with Quest<br />
(“Commercial Third Party Payors”), each Reporting Business Unit shall list, in each Exception<br />
Report, the top ten (10) such Commercial Third Party Payors (determined by revenue to the<br />
Reporting Business Unit during the Reporting Period) that have reimbursed on a Fee-for-Service<br />
basis for Potentially Reportable Tests. For each such Commercial Third Party Payor, the<br />
Reporting Business Unit shall provide, in each Exception Report, the contracted rates in effect<br />
for the Reporting Period by CPT code which the Reporting Business Unit has in its possession or<br />
can obtain from the Commercial Third Party Payor after a good faith effort.<br />
7. Each Exception Report shall also include, in a separate section, a<br />
listing by customer <strong>of</strong> all capitated contracts between the Reporting Business Unit filing the<br />
Exception Report and any entity with which it has such a capitated contract, together with a<br />
description <strong>of</strong> the essential pricing terms <strong>of</strong> the contract.<br />
7