“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ... “MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

dataspace.princeton.edu
from dataspace.princeton.edu More from this publisher
28.06.2013 Views

figures ensured that state cores played an important, but never exclusive role in these local negotiations. State legal norms would continue to clash with traditional hierarchies rooted in concepts like vecindad and reciprocity. In a way, the story of the Río de la Plata borderlands in the 19 th century is also a mirror image of the region’s history in the 20 th . The export economies of the 20 th century’s first decades enhanced the power of the state, but also fueled the creation of massive popular sectors in coastal capitals throughout the Río de la Plata. Eventually, the collapse of outward-looking economic models in the Great Depression created a renewed crisis of legitimacy. Populist leaders like Juan Perón and Getúlio Vargas worked to broaden the authority of the state even further. These leaders ushered in an era of increasing state control over the economy. They equally utilized new tools of mass culture and communication in an effort to overcome regional heterogeneity and fashion unifying national ideologies. Throughout the region, however, efforts to mobilize mass societies in the service of the nation equally polarized them. Eventually, one state after another in the Río de la Plata slipped back into the vortex of revolutionary violence. The national governments of Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay would all eventually turn to oppressive military regimes to secure order in the face of popular opposition. The power of the state over its citizens and territory had never appeared so extensive. Yet the Río de la Plata eventually reemerged from the darkness of dictatorships. New forms of solidarity that again transcended national boundaries played an important role in the painful transition to democracy. The “new social movements” that stressed human rights, gender equality and ethnic identities reached across borders in an effort to reshape national processes and identities on a regional and even global scale. Governments throughout the region also embraced liberal reforms that dramatically opened up their 368
 
 


economies to the forces of global capitalism. These processes reached their zenith with the creation of Mercosur, a customs union that sought to recreate the integration of the old cross-border commercial relationships that defined the Río de la Plata borderlands throughout much of the 19 th century. The forces of globalization, however, do not imply a uniform flattening of identities. Rather, it has given rise to alternative solidarities that are often unbound by geographic constraints. As Arjun Appadurai observed, globalization can also paradoxically serve as a powerful “localizing process.” 5 Appadurai argues that global processes can create room for distinct local appropriations of “the materials of modernity.” Local traditions, imaginations and understandings continually refashion products and images targeted to a global audience. Moreover, the world’s increasing interconnectedness paradoxically breeds “local” communities that stretch across space. The local itself becomes redefined around self- forming communities of shared identities and beliefs. Caught in the middle, the nation-state seems under almost constant assault from above and below. Appadurai concludes that the “[n]ation-state, as units in a complex interactive system, are not very likely to be the long- term arbiters of the relationship between globality and modernity.” 6 Evidence of the growing weakness of the nation-state and national identities seems everywhere. In the Mexican borderlands, drug cartels have erected an illicit economy and a violent form of governance. In the Paraguayan city of Ciudad del Este, outlet malls attract Brazilian shoppers and, according to the United States government at least, international terrorist organizations have found refuge. International corporations have grown increasingly powerful and correspondingly more difficult for national governments to 























































 5 Arjun Appadurai, Modernity at Large: The Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 1996), 17. 6 Ibid., 19. 369
 
 


figures ensured that state cores played an important, but never exclusive role in these local<br />

negotiations. State legal norms would continue to clash with traditional hierarchies rooted in<br />

concepts like vecindad and reciprocity.<br />

In a way, the story of the Río de la Plata borderlands in the 19 th century is also a<br />

mirror image of the region’s history in the 20 th . The export economies of the 20 th century’s<br />

first decades enhanced the power of the state, but also fueled the creation of massive<br />

popular sectors in coastal capitals throughout the Río de la Plata. Eventually, the collapse of<br />

outward-looking economic models in the Great Depression created a renewed crisis of<br />

legitimacy. Populist leaders like Juan Perón and Getúlio Vargas worked to broaden the<br />

authority of the state even further. These leaders ushered in an era of increasing state<br />

control over the economy. They equally utilized new tools of mass culture and<br />

communication in an effort to overcome regional heterogeneity and fashion unifying<br />

national ideologies. Throughout the region, however, efforts to mobilize mass societies in<br />

the service of the nation equally polarized them. Eventually, one state after another in the<br />

Río de la Plata slipped back into the vortex of revolutionary violence. The national<br />

governments of Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay would all eventually turn to oppressive<br />

military regimes to secure order in the face of popular opposition. The power of the state<br />

over its citizens and territory had never appeared so extensive.<br />

Yet the Río de la Plata eventually reemerged from the darkness of dictatorships.<br />

New forms of solidarity that again transcended national boundaries played an important role<br />

in the painful transition to democracy. The “new social movements” that stressed human<br />

rights, gender equality and ethnic identities reached across borders in an effort to reshape<br />

national processes and identities on a regional and even global scale. Governments<br />

throughout the region also embraced liberal reforms that dramatically opened up their<br />

368
<br />


<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!