“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ... “MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

dataspace.princeton.edu
from dataspace.princeton.edu More from this publisher
28.06.2013 Views

convicted Rodrigues of the murder and sentenced him to “life imprisonment with labor.” 73 Teixeira appealed the case, again pointing out the deficiencies in the evidence. He further filed a claim against Luis Ignacio Jacques, the delegado de policia leading the investigation, for allegedly abusing his office in gathering evidence against the two men. 74 Both the local trial and the appeal offered Alegrete’s liberal faction with a golden opportunity to justify the exclusion of their political rivals from the local government and the judiciary. They seized the moment. The local Liberals transformed the trial into an intensely public spectacle. The case involved dozens of witnesses. These “honorable vizinhos” delved into every aspect of Rodrigues’ relationship with his son and the killers. This testimony again appealed to traditional borderlands conceptions of litigation and proof. The evidence also publicly articulated the balance of political forces around Alegrete’s courthouse. The testimony aimed not only at obtaining a conviction. It also sought to push Rodrigues and his progressista allies from the sinews of local power. At the most basic level, Rodrigues had clearly violated norms of patriarchal honor. Whether he ordered the killing or not, he had failed to maintain order in his own household. The result was a violent crime that had disturbed the town. Given the fact that he had failed in the domestic sphere, Rodrigues could not be trusted in the public one either. In contrast, officials in the town could place themselves in the role of defending a defenseless victim. They also protected public decency and order. In doing so, they could proclaim their fitness to rule the town to the local population. They could also use the courts to communicate this fact to provincial officials. The appeal before the provincially appointed juiz de direito offered an opportunity 























































 73 Ibid. 74 Manoel Rodrigues da Silva e Alexandre da Cruz Santos c. Luis Ignacio Jacques, Delegado de Policia deste termo, APRGS. Alegrete. Cartório Civil e Crime. Processos Crimes, Maço 89, n. 3100 (1871) [documents in the file were not numbered]. 360
 
 


not only to affirm these local findings, but also confirm the diligence of Liberal officials in maintaining order. The juiz de direito equally played this role. He noted the thoroughness of the “subdelegado in prosecuting such an important matter.” The court then confirmed the sentence. 75 The allegations against men like Christomo and Rodrigues clearly were aimed to push important members of the Ribeiro faction, along with their legal lieutenant Mathias Teixeira de Almeida, further from Alegrete’s local government. In effect, much like the contemporaneous disputes in Salto’s courts, they provided a mechanism to signal to provincial officials that the Ribeiros could not be trusted to rule. At the same time, the cases also conveyed an important message about the Liberals that controlled the town. As provincial elites worried about maintaining order in the countryside, the cases placed Alegrete’s dominant faction clearly on the side of the law. In this way, the traditional elements of local justice provided an important means for the Liberal Party to establish its control over the province while maintaining its commitment to social order. Through these local political shifts, the Liberal Party consolidated its hold on riograndense politics throughout the 1870s. In 1872, the Liberals finally gained unquestioned control over the provincial assembly. Gaspar Silveira Martins, a rancher from Bagé, emerged as the Liberal Party’s leader during the decade. Throughout the 1870s, the Liberal Party exercised almost uncontested power over provincial life. It was only in the 1880s that a challenge to their authority emerged in the form of the new Republican Party. Rooted in positivist principles, the Republicans advocated for a dramatic centralization of political authority in both the provincial and national governments. Under the leadership of Júlio de Castilhos, the party developed a base of power around Porto Alegre and the surrounding 























































 75 Ibid. 361
 
 


convicted Rodrigues of the murder and sentenced him to “life imprisonment with labor.” 73<br />

Teixeira appealed the case, again pointing out the deficiencies in the evidence. He further<br />

filed a claim against Luis Ignacio Jacques, the delegado de policia leading the investigation, for<br />

allegedly abusing his office in gathering evidence against the two men. 74<br />

Both the local trial and the appeal offered Alegrete’s liberal faction with a golden<br />

opportunity to justify the exclusion of their political rivals from the local government and<br />

the judiciary. They seized the moment. The local Liberals transformed the trial into an<br />

intensely public spectacle. The case involved dozens of witnesses. These “honorable<br />

vizinhos” delved into every aspect of Rodrigues’ relationship with his son and the killers. This<br />

testimony again appealed to traditional borderlands conceptions of litigation and proof. The<br />

evidence also publicly articulated the balance of political forces around Alegrete’s<br />

courthouse. The testimony aimed not only at obtaining a conviction. It also sought to push<br />

Rodrigues and his progressista allies from the sinews of local power. At the most basic level,<br />

Rodrigues had clearly violated norms of patriarchal honor. Whether he ordered the killing<br />

or not, he had failed to maintain order in his own household. The result was a violent crime<br />

that had disturbed the town. Given the fact that he had failed in the domestic sphere,<br />

Rodrigues could not be trusted in the public one either. In contrast, officials in the town<br />

could place themselves in the role of defending a defenseless victim. They also protected<br />

public decency and order. In doing so, they could proclaim their fitness to rule the town to<br />

the local population. They could also use the courts to communicate this fact to provincial<br />

officials. The appeal before the provincially appointed juiz de direito offered an opportunity<br />

























































<br />

73 Ibid.<br />

74 Manoel Rodrigues da Silva e Alexandre da Cruz Santos c. Luis Ignacio Jacques, Delegado de<br />

Policia deste termo, APRGS. Alegrete. Cartório Civil e Crime. Processos Crimes, Maço 89, n.<br />

3100 (1871) [documents in the file were not numbered].<br />

360
<br />


<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!