28.06.2013 Views

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

political allegiances. Within the framework of the borderlands legal order, the testimony of<br />

“honorable vecinos,” whether informal or not, also offered one of the best forms of judicial<br />

proof possible. Arteagada, however, refused to recognize it. He wrote that the court had to<br />

“judge the matter on the facts, not allegations.” 50 He then dismissed the case. In contrast to<br />

his decision in favor of Guimaraens and his allies on the JEA, Arteagada this time directly<br />

challenged a powerful local figure. He also publicly repudiated the network of local allies<br />

Saldaña had called forth in support of his property rights. As we have seen on a number of<br />

occasions, Arteagada’s decision directly confronted Saldaña’s place in the community.<br />

Saldaña had to respond forcefully or risk losing his status within his local legal world.<br />

To protect his personal reputation, Saldaña returned to the courts. He also used<br />

Salto’s tribunals to articulate the limits on the power of national judicial figures like<br />

Arteagada to reject local legal norms. The specific incident involved a fight between Julio<br />

Delgado, Arteagada’s bailiff, and Alberto Maldonado, the departmental fiscal. 51 According to<br />

witnesses, Maldonado and Delgado had an altercation as they were leaving the residence of<br />

Juan Cruz y Costa, the jefe político. Delgado had accused Maldonado of corruption for<br />

receiving “considerations” from Mauricio Castro, Salto’s notary public. The allegations<br />

connected to Castro’s involvement with Emilio Thevenet and others in their ongoing<br />

disputes over the activities of the JEA. Reports then differed as to whether Delgado or<br />

Maldonado fired a pistol at the other. Not taking any chances, Arteagada ordered both men<br />

imprisoned until the facts regarding the disturbance could be resolved.<br />

Saldaña and his allies seized the incident to discredit Arteagada. The men drafted<br />

several letters highlighting Arteagada’s connections to Castro. Recall that Castro had been<br />

























































<br />

50 Sumaria información seguida á Teodoro Lafitte, 71bis.<br />

51 Sumario de Julio Delgado y Alberto Maldonado por pelea, AGN-SJ. Salto. Penales, n. 1<br />

(1879). The incident purportedly occurred in 1878.<br />

351
<br />


<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!