28.06.2013 Views

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

following the order designated by the Laws that govern us.” 20 If Mendoza acceded to the<br />

intervention of outside authorities, therefore, he “would demonstrate . . . bias against the<br />

Laws and dignity and impartiality that he observes in all of his acts.” 21 In penning this letter<br />

to the JEA and national officials, Mendoza framed the neutral application of the law as a<br />

firm limit on the ability of the central government to interfere in the local dispute. Like<br />

Guimaraens, Mendoza did not directly challenge national officials or rule out a contradictory<br />

verdict in the event of an appeal. Rather, he used local fealty to national laws to articulate<br />

the boundaries between local and national power. Local officials had the bulk of the say in<br />

the current matter. In this sense, the law and control of courtrooms permitted Guimaraens<br />

and his allies to proclaim simultaneously their loyalty to the nation, but also their autonomy<br />

from it when it came to important issues of local justice. This was precisely the balance<br />

Urquiza had fatally labored to construct a decade earlier across the river.<br />

In response, officials in Montevideo accepted Mendoza’s arguments about their<br />

respective spheres of authority. The fiscal in Montevideo concluded that “the denounced<br />

irregularities did not in [his] judgment demand any remedy.” 22 He continued that the sole<br />

actions by national officials should be to “order Salto’s [JEA] that from here forward it<br />

strictly comply with current regulations.” Regarding any prior violations, the fiscal opined<br />

that any of these could be litigated “before those Tribunals to which those actions properly<br />

correspond.” That is to say, before the local courts. In case there was any doubt in the<br />

matter, the fiscal concluded:<br />

























































<br />

20 B. Mendoza al Sor. Presidente de la Junta E. Administrativa del Departamento Francisco<br />

Guimaraens, AGN. Sección Administrativa. Salto: Junta Económico-Administrativa (August<br />

31, 1874), 1.<br />

21 Ibid.<br />

22 Fiscal al Ministero de Gobierno, AGN. Sección Administrativa. Salto: Junta Económico-<br />

Administrativa (October 1, 1874), 1.<br />

341
<br />


<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!