28.06.2013 Views

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

een well-founded now that Falcon had brought suit against Raffo. 17 The letter then struck<br />

a conciliatory tone. Guimaraens welcomed a national intervention if it “would clarify what is<br />

or is not the law, providing for us a legal precedent going forward so as to avoid an infinite<br />

number of questions that can arise.” Despite stressing to national officials his desire to<br />

cooperate in any investigation, Guimaraens concluded by lamenting that the matter could<br />

not have been handled locally. He wrote:<br />

[W]e [the JEA] regret that our colleague D. Agustín Guarch did not, before directing<br />

himself to Your Excellency, make a motion before this Corporation along the same<br />

lines, since we like him have no interest in mind other than the welfare, progress and<br />

improvement of this department, seeking within the Law that means to realize<br />

them. 18<br />

Implicit in Guimaraens’ letter was the idea that this was a local matter “between vecinos.”<br />

The national government should intercede only to preserve order and promote clarity.<br />

Guimaraens accepted that the national government had a legitimate role to play. However,<br />

he also emphasized careful discretion in exercising it. In this sense, he echoed the growing<br />

consensus of local elites throughout the borderlands concerning the terms of their<br />

relationship with central authorities. National officials could not simply be ignored or<br />

rejected out of hand, but neither should they be given free reign to intercede in important<br />

local questions of property rights and personal prestige. 19<br />

In a separate letter, Bernabé Mendoza, the alcalde ordinario presiding over the Falcon<br />

case, made Guimaraens’ implicit limits on the authority of the central government to<br />

intervene directly in local legal questions explicit. Mendoza argued that he could “not<br />

authorize the intervention [proposed by Guarch and the JEA] because these proceedings are<br />

























































<br />

17 Francisco Guimaraens, Juan Castro y Emilio E. Thevenet al Sor. Ministro de Gobierno Dr. D.<br />

Saturnino Alvarez, AGN. Sección Administrativa. Salto: Junta Económico-Administrativa<br />

(September 24, 1874), 1.<br />

18 Ibid.<br />

19 Ibid.<br />

340
<br />


<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!