“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...
“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ... “MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...
The calculation for Mitre’s government was entirely different. Following their victory at Pavón, Mitre had engaged in a prolonged campaign to establish national authority over the traditionally federalist provinces in the interior. Mitre’s stance in Uruguay and later against Paraguay in many ways represented a logical extension of these domestic conflicts. In particular, they provided the porteño leader with a means to erode bases of federalist opposition throughout the Río de la Plata basin. Yet, Mitre did not directly press for war against the Paraguayans. Like Urquiza, Mitre feared the growing Brazilian influence in the basin. He sought to position Argentina to take advantage of the tensions between the Paraguayans and the Brazilians. Mitre, therefore, fashioned a strategy designed to restrict Paraguayan involvement in the Uruguayan conflict by prohibiting Paraguayan passage through Argentine territory. At the same time, however, Mitre refused Brazilian requests for support for their planned naval blockade of Paraguayan ports on the Paraná River. Through these actions, Mitre hoped to push military conflicts away from Argentine borders, while still using the Paraguayan presence to limit Brazilian activities throughout the Río de la Plata basin. 18 The Triple Alliance War and the Limits of Radical Federalism Mitre, however, miscalculated that he could contain tensions with Paraguay without provoking an open conflict. Confident that the federalists and emigrant blancos in the Argentine Littoral would rally to his side, Solano López invaded Corrientes in early 1865. Paraguayan forces advanced on two fronts. Troops moving along the western flank quickly 18 Whigham, The Paraguayan War, 238-54. Whigham particularly rejects “revisionist” notions that Mitre aimed to provoke Paraguay into a conflict. He writes: “Mitre harbored great ambitions for himself and his country. Revisionists are right in supposing that he wished to forge a new hegemonic order in the Plata with Buenos Aires dominant over all the other provinces of the old viceroyalty, including Paraguay and the Banda Oriental. His plans, however, never included provoking the Paraguayans into a genuine war with Argentina.” Ibid., 252. 306
captured the city of Corrientes. To the east, Paraguayan troops entered Brazil and captured Uruguaiana and the correntino port of Restauración just across the river. 19 The invasion ensured that Mitre and the national forces under his command would now enter the conflict along with the Brazilian empire and the colorados in the Estado Oriental. Brazilian diplomats promptly opened up negotiations with the Argentine government on the terms of an alliance against Paraguay. On 12 and 13 June 1865, Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay exchanged ratifications of their Triple Alliance against the Paraguayans. The entire Río de la Plata basin was once again at war. 20 Mitre’s intervention presented Urquiza with a dilemma. Mitre requested troops from Entre Ríos to support his campaign against the Paraguayans in Corrientes. If Urquiza refused, he risked undermining his exclusive control over Entre Ríos’ still substantial armed forces and perhaps provoking an internal civil war. On the other hand, dissident federalists like López Jordán clamored for him to support the Paraguayans. López Jordán openly declared that Mitre, not Paraguay, represented the true enemy in the conflict. He wrote: “You [Urquiza] call on us to fight against Paraguay. Never, my General, for that nation is our friend. Call on us to fight the Brazilians and the porteños and we will be ready – for they are our enemies.” 21 Despite the protests from the dissident federalists, Urquiza again decided to throw his support behind Mitre. This stance likely reflected Urquiza’s sense that opposing the new national government carried with it unacceptable risks, both for himself and his vision for an Argentine nation built around a union of coequal provinces. It also reflected the central guiding principle in Urquiza’s political maneuvering in the wake of Pavón – direct opposition to the national state was no longer a real possibility. Urquiza 19 Ibid., 263. 20 Ibid., 276. 21 Ibid., 330. 307
- Page 265 and 266: positioned the Ribeiro faction to g
- Page 267 and 268: Borderlands inhabitants in the earl
- Page 269 and 270: neatly encapsulated the ongoing con
- Page 271 and 272: for Brazilian ranchers. In the best
- Page 273 and 274: anchers operating throughout the bo
- Page 275 and 276: Brazilian slave laws followed them
- Page 277 and 278: familial connections on the Brazili
- Page 279 and 280: defined their respective places in
- Page 281 and 282: supply his troops. 26 By the time o
- Page 283 and 284: Brazilian masters that resulted in
- Page 285 and 286: pursue further rights. They would p
- Page 287 and 288: in the Estado Oriental. At the hear
- Page 289 and 290: was also a personal enemy of Canaba
- Page 291 and 292: part of a broader narrative of conf
- Page 293 and 294: anything, Orientales.” 56 Gomez
- Page 295 and 296: anchers, like that of local Uruguay
- Page 297 and 298: “complete proof of oriental natio
- Page 299 and 300: Uruguayan notaries. These included
- Page 301 and 302: Republic over issues of rivertine t
- Page 303 and 304: his cattle in 1858. 79 Recall also
- Page 305 and 306: of warfare in the borderlands furth
- Page 307 and 308: In effect, he hoped to exchange loy
- Page 309 and 310: guarantee their commercial relation
- Page 311 and 312: governments in Montevideo and Brazi
- Page 313 and 314: nineteen in the provincial militia
- Page 315: authority to contain the more radic
- Page 319 and 320: Urquiza struggled to reorganize his
- Page 321 and 322: attle in March of 1870. 29 By the e
- Page 323 and 324: The national government sent an “
- Page 325 and 326: the reciprocal trading relationship
- Page 327 and 328: splintered into “traditional” a
- Page 329 and 330: country’s ranching elites. In res
- Page 331 and 332: these absurd and unwarranted charge
- Page 333 and 334: protect “the development of those
- Page 335 and 336: police forces to better protect cat
- Page 337 and 338: conspiracies, the steady stream of
- Page 339 and 340: matter was overblown and that repor
- Page 341 and 342: CHAPTER 8 NEGOTIATING NATIONS ALTHO
- Page 343 and 344: Local Legal Practices and National
- Page 345 and 346: pointed link between the “honor
- Page 347 and 348: personal interests, Guarch’s fact
- Page 349 and 350: Guarch first sought to tip the scal
- Page 351 and 352: following the order designated by t
- Page 353 and 354: history in 1877. 24 Salto’s first
- Page 355 and 356: twenty-five peso fine. 29 Leal prom
- Page 357 and 358: serves?” 36 He continued: “Does
- Page 359 and 360: abuses “no doubt flowed from the
- Page 361 and 362: political allegiances. Within the f
- Page 363 and 364: Operating within this relationship,
- Page 365 and 366: By the dawn of the 1880s, national
The calculation for Mitre’s government was entirely different. Following their<br />
victory at Pavón, Mitre had engaged in a prolonged campaign to establish national authority<br />
over the traditionally federalist provinces in the interior. Mitre’s stance in Uruguay and later<br />
against Paraguay in many ways represented a logical extension of these domestic conflicts.<br />
In particular, they provided the porteño leader with a means to erode bases of federalist<br />
opposition throughout the Río de la Plata basin. Yet, Mitre did not directly press for war<br />
against the Paraguayans. Like Urquiza, Mitre feared the growing Brazilian influence in the<br />
basin. He sought to position Argentina to take advantage of the tensions between the<br />
Paraguayans and the Brazilians. Mitre, therefore, fashioned a strategy designed to restrict<br />
Paraguayan involvement in the Uruguayan conflict by prohibiting Paraguayan passage<br />
through Argentine territory. At the same time, however, Mitre refused Brazilian requests for<br />
support for their planned naval blockade of Paraguayan ports on the Paraná River. Through<br />
these actions, Mitre hoped to push military conflicts away from Argentine borders, while still<br />
using the Paraguayan presence to limit Brazilian activities throughout the Río de la Plata<br />
basin. 18<br />
The Triple Alliance War and the Limits of Radical Federalism<br />
Mitre, however, miscalculated that he could contain tensions with Paraguay without<br />
provoking an open conflict. Confident that the federalists and emigrant blancos in the<br />
Argentine Littoral would rally to his side, Solano López invaded Corrientes in early 1865.<br />
Paraguayan forces advanced on two fronts. Troops moving along the western flank quickly<br />
<br />
18 Whigham, The Paraguayan War, 238-54. Whigham particularly rejects “revisionist”<br />
notions that Mitre aimed to provoke Paraguay into a conflict. He writes: “Mitre harbored<br />
great ambitions for himself and his country. Revisionists are right in supposing that he<br />
wished to forge a new hegemonic order in the Plata with Buenos Aires dominant over all the<br />
other provinces of the old viceroyalty, including Paraguay and the Banda Oriental. His<br />
plans, however, never included provoking the Paraguayans into a genuine war with<br />
Argentina.” Ibid., 252.<br />
306 <br />
<br />