“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ... “MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

dataspace.princeton.edu
from dataspace.princeton.edu More from this publisher
28.06.2013 Views

The calculation for Mitre’s government was entirely different. Following their victory at Pavón, Mitre had engaged in a prolonged campaign to establish national authority over the traditionally federalist provinces in the interior. Mitre’s stance in Uruguay and later against Paraguay in many ways represented a logical extension of these domestic conflicts. In particular, they provided the porteño leader with a means to erode bases of federalist opposition throughout the Río de la Plata basin. Yet, Mitre did not directly press for war against the Paraguayans. Like Urquiza, Mitre feared the growing Brazilian influence in the basin. He sought to position Argentina to take advantage of the tensions between the Paraguayans and the Brazilians. Mitre, therefore, fashioned a strategy designed to restrict Paraguayan involvement in the Uruguayan conflict by prohibiting Paraguayan passage through Argentine territory. At the same time, however, Mitre refused Brazilian requests for support for their planned naval blockade of Paraguayan ports on the Paraná River. Through these actions, Mitre hoped to push military conflicts away from Argentine borders, while still using the Paraguayan presence to limit Brazilian activities throughout the Río de la Plata basin. 18 The Triple Alliance War and the Limits of Radical Federalism Mitre, however, miscalculated that he could contain tensions with Paraguay without provoking an open conflict. Confident that the federalists and emigrant blancos in the Argentine Littoral would rally to his side, Solano López invaded Corrientes in early 1865. Paraguayan forces advanced on two fronts. Troops moving along the western flank quickly 























































 18 Whigham, The Paraguayan War, 238-54. Whigham particularly rejects “revisionist” notions that Mitre aimed to provoke Paraguay into a conflict. He writes: “Mitre harbored great ambitions for himself and his country. Revisionists are right in supposing that he wished to forge a new hegemonic order in the Plata with Buenos Aires dominant over all the other provinces of the old viceroyalty, including Paraguay and the Banda Oriental. His plans, however, never included provoking the Paraguayans into a genuine war with Argentina.” Ibid., 252. 306
 
 


captured the city of Corrientes. To the east, Paraguayan troops entered Brazil and captured Uruguaiana and the correntino port of Restauración just across the river. 19 The invasion ensured that Mitre and the national forces under his command would now enter the conflict along with the Brazilian empire and the colorados in the Estado Oriental. Brazilian diplomats promptly opened up negotiations with the Argentine government on the terms of an alliance against Paraguay. On 12 and 13 June 1865, Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay exchanged ratifications of their Triple Alliance against the Paraguayans. The entire Río de la Plata basin was once again at war. 20 Mitre’s intervention presented Urquiza with a dilemma. Mitre requested troops from Entre Ríos to support his campaign against the Paraguayans in Corrientes. If Urquiza refused, he risked undermining his exclusive control over Entre Ríos’ still substantial armed forces and perhaps provoking an internal civil war. On the other hand, dissident federalists like López Jordán clamored for him to support the Paraguayans. López Jordán openly declared that Mitre, not Paraguay, represented the true enemy in the conflict. He wrote: “You [Urquiza] call on us to fight against Paraguay. Never, my General, for that nation is our friend. Call on us to fight the Brazilians and the porteños and we will be ready – for they are our enemies.” 21 Despite the protests from the dissident federalists, Urquiza again decided to throw his support behind Mitre. This stance likely reflected Urquiza’s sense that opposing the new national government carried with it unacceptable risks, both for himself and his vision for an Argentine nation built around a union of coequal provinces. It also reflected the central guiding principle in Urquiza’s political maneuvering in the wake of Pavón – direct opposition to the national state was no longer a real possibility. Urquiza 























































 19 Ibid., 263. 20 Ibid., 276. 21 Ibid., 330. 307
 
 


The calculation for Mitre’s government was entirely different. Following their<br />

victory at Pavón, Mitre had engaged in a prolonged campaign to establish national authority<br />

over the traditionally federalist provinces in the interior. Mitre’s stance in Uruguay and later<br />

against Paraguay in many ways represented a logical extension of these domestic conflicts.<br />

In particular, they provided the porteño leader with a means to erode bases of federalist<br />

opposition throughout the Río de la Plata basin. Yet, Mitre did not directly press for war<br />

against the Paraguayans. Like Urquiza, Mitre feared the growing Brazilian influence in the<br />

basin. He sought to position Argentina to take advantage of the tensions between the<br />

Paraguayans and the Brazilians. Mitre, therefore, fashioned a strategy designed to restrict<br />

Paraguayan involvement in the Uruguayan conflict by prohibiting Paraguayan passage<br />

through Argentine territory. At the same time, however, Mitre refused Brazilian requests for<br />

support for their planned naval blockade of Paraguayan ports on the Paraná River. Through<br />

these actions, Mitre hoped to push military conflicts away from Argentine borders, while still<br />

using the Paraguayan presence to limit Brazilian activities throughout the Río de la Plata<br />

basin. 18<br />

The Triple Alliance War and the Limits of Radical Federalism<br />

Mitre, however, miscalculated that he could contain tensions with Paraguay without<br />

provoking an open conflict. Confident that the federalists and emigrant blancos in the<br />

Argentine Littoral would rally to his side, Solano López invaded Corrientes in early 1865.<br />

Paraguayan forces advanced on two fronts. Troops moving along the western flank quickly<br />

























































<br />

18 Whigham, The Paraguayan War, 238-54. Whigham particularly rejects “revisionist”<br />

notions that Mitre aimed to provoke Paraguay into a conflict. He writes: “Mitre harbored<br />

great ambitions for himself and his country. Revisionists are right in supposing that he<br />

wished to forge a new hegemonic order in the Plata with Buenos Aires dominant over all the<br />

other provinces of the old viceroyalty, including Paraguay and the Banda Oriental. His<br />

plans, however, never included provoking the Paraguayans into a genuine war with<br />

Argentina.” Ibid., 252.<br />

306
<br />


<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!