28.06.2013 Views

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In response, Sañudo returned to the courts. He appeared before Judge José Chirif<br />

on behalf of Joaquim’s widow, Felizberta Benita da Mota, in order to challenge the seizure. 48<br />

Chirif was Sañudo’s political ally, supporting the colorados locally in Salto. 49 To that end,<br />

Chirif had resigned his position on Salto’s junta económica-administrativa in 1856 in protest over<br />

political disputes between the two factions in connection with that year’s national elections. 50<br />

By 1858, however, he was back in a judicial post and ready to help Sañudo defend his<br />

partnership’s assets from José.<br />

In connection with the new litigation, Sañudo returned to the language of citizenship<br />

to defend his property rights against violent, factional incursions. Benita, probably speaking<br />

through Sañudo, wrote a letter detailing the events following her husband’s death. In it, she<br />

emphasized her status as both a women and a foreigner in warranting protection from the<br />

court: “Weak and defenseless by the nature of my sex, I seek [busco] the protection of the<br />

laws of this country under which I am living as a foreigner, along with the security that the<br />

Constitution accords my person and my interests.” 51 Not surprisingly, the national divisions<br />

she invoked were much more hazy than her letter implied. Benita (and Sañudo) drew upon<br />

her foreign status to protect her estate from the violent conduct of her Brazilian brother-in-<br />

law and his local allies. She further did so in order to protect Sañudo’s commercial assets.<br />

Everyone involved in the litigation no doubt understood these ambiguities. Yet, by framing<br />

her position in terms of citizenship, Benita effectively nationalized her family’s cross-border<br />

dispute. In making this move, Benita and Sañudo once again situated their own conflict as<br />

























































<br />

48 Felizberta Benita de Mota por la Casa de Joaquin Gonzaga Ferreira.<br />

49 Chirif also possessed connections to Venancio Flores. Flores wrote to Chirif in<br />

1865, referred to him as his “esteemed friend” and thanking him for his help with the war<br />

effort. Venancio Flores al Señor Don J. Cherif, AGN. Salto. Jefatura (September 7, 1865).<br />

50 AGN. Particulares. Archivo de General Lucas Piriz, Caja 9, Carpeta 5, Carta<br />

Confidencial de Lucas Piriz al Exmo. Sor. D. Gabriel Antonio Pereyra, No. 30 (August 8, 1856).<br />

51 Felizberta Benita da Mota por la casa de Joaquim Gonzaga Ferreira, 5bis.<br />

280
<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!