28.06.2013 Views

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

conflict over Fermin’s continued presence in Uruguay loomed. The 1851 Brazilian invasion<br />

provided Fermin’s Brazilian owners with an opportunity to test his carefully constructed<br />

relationships. Manuel Ferreira’s death immediately prior to the Brazilian campaign further<br />

ensured that Fermin would once again be swept up in these factional and international<br />

conflicts. A dispute quickly erupted between two of Manuel Ferreira’s sons, Joaquim and<br />

José Ferreira, over Fermin. José aligned himself with his brother Lucio and his mother,<br />

Bernadina. They claimed that Fermin properly belonged to Bernadina as a slave and should<br />

be returned to Rio Pardo in Brazil. José probably had good reason to do this: he owed<br />

Joaquim and other creditors money. 37 José further faced accusations in the Brazilian courts<br />

that he had defrauded several prominent officials in Alegrete. He had ultimately been<br />

arrested in 1852. 38 By retaining Fermin for his mother, José likely could obtain access to a<br />

valuable asset. This could better his economic prospects and his ability to pay his debts. In<br />

the process, he could perhaps restore his damaged personal reputation.<br />

José acted quickly to secure his alleged property by entering into a contract with<br />

David Canabarro. The contract purported to rent Fermin to the Brazilian general in order to<br />

serve his forces in the 1851 campaign. 39 José’s contract with Canabarro for Fermin’s services<br />

again needs to be understood in light of the factional conflict between Canabarro and the<br />

Ribeiros for control over Alegrete’s comarca. Recall that the Ribeiro faction held sway over<br />

Alegrete’s courts throughout the 1850s. José faced criminal charges there. Moreover, José’s<br />

brother, Joaquim, possessed growing commercial connections to the Ribeiros and their allies<br />

























































<br />

37 D. Agustín Sañudo c. D. José da Asunción Ferreira, cobrando especialmente 751 patacones,<br />

AGN-SJ. Salto. Letrados Civiles, No. 24 (1856).<br />

38 José Pinto de Oliveira c. José d’Assumpção Ferreira, APRGS. Alegrete. Cartório Civil e<br />

Crime. Processos Crimes, Maço 78, No. 2736 (1852).<br />

39 José da Asumpção Pereyra, subdito Brasilero y apoderado general de su madre Dn. Bernadina<br />

Maria Pereyra.<br />

276
<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!